This paper utilizes critical theory to interrogate and problematize the practice of anonymising research sites as an ethical imperative. The contributing authors conduct research in and with various communities in southern Africa, position themselves and work from and within diverse areas and specialities of the social sciences. This article is developed from their rich and wide spectrum of field experience with a great diversity of communities, but mainly the poorer, under-resourced, socially and economically marginalized. The authors strongly identify with these communities whose anonymity in published research is seen as marginalizing. Such research sites are places and communities where these researchers grew up and live in, and thus not just as peripheral or ‘out there’ entities. Therefore, the naming of research sites in this context is deemed as being ethical, out of respect for participants, for a contextually embedded understanding, and for well-targeted interventions and policy influence.
AndersonK.CidroJ. (2019). Decades of doing: indigenous women academics reflect on the practices of community-based health research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(3), 222‐233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619835707
2.
AndersonM.KleinertS. (2013). Montreal statement on research integrity in crossboundary research collaborations [Paper presentation]. Third world conference on research integrity, Montreal, Canada.
3.
ASSAf, CHE, DHET, DST, NRF, & USAf. (2019). Statement on ethical research and scholarly publishing practices. South African Journal of Science, 115(11/12). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/a0316
4.
BainL. E.EbuenyiI. D.EkukweN. C.AwahP. K. (2018). Rethinking research ethics committees in low- and medium-income countries. Research Ethics, 14(1), 1‐7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117692026
5.
BeckerH. (2007). De-provincialising South African anthropology: On relevance, public culture & the citizen anthropologist. Anthropology Southern Africa, 30(3–4), 85‐96. https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2007.11499951
6.
BrayR. (2014). Layers of watching and protection in research with children. In PoselD.RossF. (Eds.), Ethical quandaries in social research (pp. 27‐40). HSRC Press.
7.
BunchA. J. (2015). Epistemic violence in the process of othering: Real-world applications and moving forward. Scholarly Undergraduate Research Journal at Clark, 1(1), 2. https://commons.clarku.edu/surj/vol1/iss1/2
8.
ByrneC. C. (2009). Proactive versus defensive ethics: Re-humanizing psychology. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 15(2), 215‐225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10781910902849722
9.
CastellanoM. B. (2004). Ethics of Aboriginal research. Journal of Aboriginal Health, 1(1), 98‐114.
10.
ChilisaB. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. Sage.
11.
ChilisaB.MajorT. E.Khudu-PetersenK. (2017). Community engagement with a postcolonial, African-based relational paradigm. Qualitative Research, 17(3), 326‐339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117696176
12.
ChilisaB.MertensD. M. (2021). Indigenous made in Africa evaluation frameworks: Addressing epistemic violence and contributing to social transformation. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(2), 241‐253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020948601
CluverL., the Young Carers team, BustamamM. B.CasaleA.HendersonM.KKuoK.LaneT.LatiefS.LatiefN.MauchlineK.MeinckF.MoshabelaM.OrkinM.RosenfeldJ.SelloL. (2014). The cost of action: Large-scale, longitudinal quantitative research with AIDS-affected children in South Africa. In PoselD.RossF. (Eds.), Ethical quandaries in social research (pp. 41‐56). HSRC Press.
CornellJ.RateleK.KessiS. (2016). Race, gender and sexuality in student experiences of violence and resistances on a university campus. Perspectives in Education, 34(2), 97‐119. http://dx.https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v34i2.8
17.
EbrahimH. B. (2010). Situated ethics: possibilities for young children as research participants in the South African context. Early Child Development and Care, 180(3), 289‐298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430701822958
18.
FanaT. E.MayekisoT.GwandureC. (2013). An assessment of community members’ knowledge of drug resistant Tuberculosis and HIV and AIDS in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Africa Insight, 43, 59‐73. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ai/issue/view/11127
19.
FisherC. B.RagsdaleK. (2006). Goodness-of-fit ethics for multicultural research. In TrimbleJ. E.FisherC. B. (Eds.), Handbook of ethical research with ethnocultural populations and communities (pp. 3‐26). Sage.
20.
FreimuthV. S.QuinnS. C.ThomasS. B.ColeG.ZookE.DuncanT. (2001). African Americans’ views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Social Science & Medicine, 52(5), 797‐808. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00178-7
21.
Gobodo-MadikizelaP. (2009). Exploring the ethical principle of social responsibility and other ethical issues in the context of the mental health professionals’ response to xenophobic violence in Cape Town. Psycho-analytic Psychotherapy in South Africa, 17(2), 79‐101.
22.
Gobodo-MadikizelaP. (2016). Breaking intergenerational cycles of repetition: A global dialogue on historical trauma and memory. In Gobodo-MadikizelaP. (Ed.), Breaking intergenerational cycles of repetition: A global dialogue on historical trauma and memory (pp. 1‐11). Budrich Academic Press.
23.
GrinyerA. (2002). The anonymity of research participants: Assumptions, ethics and practicalities. Social research update, 36(1), 1‐4.
24.
GuentherK. M. (2009). The politics of names: Rethinking the methodological and ethical significance of naming people, organizations, and places. Qualitative Research, 9(4), 411‐421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109337872
Human Resource Development Council (HRDC) Secretariat (2016). 2016 Report on the status of human resource development in South Africa. Submerge Publishers cc.
27.
International Union of Psychological Science (IUP) (2008). Universal declaration of ethical principles for psychologists. Berlin.
28.
KheswaJ. G. (2016). Exploring the impact of discrimination on the psychological well-being of lesbian students at South African university campus. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v8n2.17
KhumaloI. P.De KlerkW. (2018). Ethical psychological research and community engagement in a South African context. In KramerS. L. S.FynnA.Janse van VuurenH. H. (Eds.), Online Readings in Research Methods (ORIM). Psychological Society of South Africa.
31.
JasperK. (2019). The need for improved ethics guidelines in a changing research landscape. South African Journal of Science, 115(11/12). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/6349
32.
KunhiyopS. W. (2008). African Christian ethics. Hippo Books.
33.
KynochG. (1999). From the ninevites to the hard livings gang: township gangsters and urban violence in twentieth-century South Africa. African Studies, 58(1), 55‐85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00020189908707905
34.
MakushaT.RichterL. (2016). Non-resident black fathers in South Africa. International Journal of Psychology, 51, 581.
35.
MatlakalaF. K.MakhubeleJ. C.SekgaleI. L.MafaP. (2019). Perspectives of single mothers on the socio-emotional and economic influence of ‘absent fathers’ in child’s life: A case study of rural community in South Africa. e-Bangi: Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 16, 4.
36.
MayiselaS. (2016). Research ethics and ethical dilemmas in the South African context. In FrickL.MotshoaneP.McMasterC.MurphyC. (Eds.), Postgraduate study in South Africa: surviving and succeeding (pp. 39‐49). Sun Media.
37.
MertensD. M. (2016). Advancing social change in South Africa through transformative research. South African Review of Sociology, 47(1), 5‐17. https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2015.1131622
38.
MertensD. M.GinsbergP. E. (2008). Deep in ethical waters: transformative perspectives for qualitative social work research. Qualitative Social Work, 7(4), 484‐503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325008097142
39.
MfecaneS. (2014). Friends in the field. In PoselD.RossF. C. (Eds.), Ethical quandaries in social research (pp. 125‐130). HSRC Press.
40.
MoherD.BouterL.KleinertS.GlasziouP.ShamM. H.BarbourV.CoriatA-MFoegerNDirnaglU. (2020). The Hong Kong principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity. PLoS Biology, 18(7), e3000737. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000737
41.
NdunaM.SikweyiyaY.KhunouG.PamboV.MdletsheT. (2016a). Ethical reflections in qualitative research on father’s absence: A South African township case study. In NakrayK.AlstonM.WhittenburyK. (Eds.), Social science research ethics for a globalizing world: interdisciplinary and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 223-239). Routledge.
42.
NdunaM.SikweyiyaY.KhunouG.PamboV.MdletsheT. (2016b). Vicarious and secondary trauma in interviews on father identity and connections. In NakrayK.AlstonM.WhittenburyK. (Eds.), Social science research ethics for a globalizing world: Interdisciplinary and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 290‐303). Routledge.
43.
NdunaM.TabaneC.KhumaloI. P.KheswaJ. (2020). Research ethics in contexts of historical trauma in southern Africa (M. Nduna, C. Tabane, I. P. Khumalo, & J. Kheswa, Trans.). YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJY4Y5P06Mo&t=48s.
Phaswana-MafuyaN.TabaneC.DavidsA. (2016). Community member perceptions of influences on teenage pregnancies. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 26(5), 419‐427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2016.1185916
46.
PillayA. (2015). Psychology, ethics, human rights, and national security. South African Journal of Psychology, 45(4), 424‐429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246315611045
47.
PillayD. (Gansen)QhobelaM. (2019). Research ethics and integrity challenges require innovative approaches. South African Journal of Science, 115(11/12). https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/7485
48.
PoselD.RossF. C. (2014). Opening up the quandaries of research ethics: Beyond the formalities of institutional ethical review. In PoselD.RossF. C. (Eds.), Ethical quandaries of social research (pp. 1‐26). HSRC Press.
49.
RaffaelliM.LazarevicV.KollerS. H.NsamenangA. B.SharmaD. (2013). Introduction: Special issue on adolescents in the majority world. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(1), 1‐8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12000
50.
RavhuhaliF.MashauT. S.LavhelaniP. N.MudzielwanaN. P.MulovhedziS. (2019). Demystifying foundation phase teaching: male student teachers’ motivation to enroll for B.ED. Degree in foundation phase at a rural university. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(6), 283‐299. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-6-3138
SaidD. G. (2016). Transforming the lens of vulnerability: Human agency as an ethical consideration in research with refugees. In NakrayK.AlstonM.WhittenburyK. (Eds.), Social sciences research ethics for a globalizing world: interdisciplinary and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 208‐222). Routledge.
53.
ShusterE. (1997). Fifty years later: The significance of the Nuremberg Code. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(20), 1436‐1440. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199711133372006
54.
SilaigwanaB.WassenaarD. (2019). Views of South African biomedical research ethics committee members on their own ethics review outcomes. South African Journal Of Bioethics And Law, 12(1), 8‐13. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2019.v12i1.654
55.
SitholeS. (2015). Challenges faced by gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (glbt) students at a South African university. TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 11(4), 193‐219. https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v11i4.54
56.
SkinnerD.MfecaneS. (2004). Stigma, discrimination and the implications for people living with HIV/AIDS in South Africa. Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS, 1(3), 157‐164. https://doi.org/10.1080/17290376.2004.9724838
57.
South African Department of Health (DOH). (2014, September 19). National Health Act (Act No. 61 of 2003) Regulations relating to research with human participants (Government Gazette No. R. 719). Pretoria: Government Printing Works.
South African Government Information (1996). Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. (Act No. 108 of 1996). Cape Town, Parliament.
60.
ThabetheS.SlackC.LindeggerG.WilkinsonA.WassenaarD.KerrP.BekkerL.-G.MngadiK.NewmanP. (2018). “Why Don’t You Go Into Suburbs? Why Are You targeting Us?”: Trust and mistrust in HIV vaccine trials in South Africa. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(5), 525‐536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618804740
61.
TheronL. C. (2013). Community-researcher liaisons: The pathways to resilience project advisory panel. South African Journal of Education, 33(4), 1‐19. https://doi.org/10.15700/201412171324
62.
TilleyL.WoodthorpeK. (2011). Is it the end for anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher. Qualitative Research, 11(2), 197‐212. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110394073
63.
Tsoka-GwegweniJ. M.WassenaarD. R. (2014). Using the Emanuel, Et al. Framework to assess ethical issues raised by a biomedical research ethics committee in South Africa. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(5), 36‐45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614553172
64.
UysL. R. (2008). Should researchers protect the good name and reputation of institutions in which research is done?South African Journal of Higher Education, 22(2), 457‐465. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ848604
65.
WardC.MakushaT.BrayR. (2015). Parenting, poverty and young people in South Africa: What are the connections? In De LannoyA.SwartzS.LakeL.SmithC. (Eds.), South African child gauge (pp. 69‐74). Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town.
66.
WassenaarD.MamotteN. (2012). Ethical issues and ethics reviews in social science research. In FerreroA.KorkutY.LeachM.LindsayG.StevensM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics (pp. 268‐282). Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199739165.001.0001
