Deliberative democratic engagement is used around the globe to gather informed public input on contentious collective questions. Yet, rarely has it been used to convene individuals exclusively from Indigenous communities. The relative novelty of using this approach to engage tribal communities and concerns about diversity and inequities raise important methodological questions. We describe the design and quality outcomes for a 2.5-day deliberation that elicited views of American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) leaders about the potential value and ethical conduct of precision medicine research (PMR), an emerging approach to research that investigates the health effects of individual genetic variation in tandem with variation in health-relevant practices, social determinants, and environmental exposures. The event met key goals, such as relationship and rapport formation, cross-site learning, equality of opportunity to participate, and respect among participants in the context of disagreement.
AbdullahC.KarpowitzC. F.RaphaelC. (2016). Equality and equity in deliberation: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Public Deliberation, 12(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.253
2.
AbelsonJ.BlacksherE. A.LiK. K.BoesveldS. E.GooldS. D. (2013). Public deliberation in health policy and bioethics: Mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(1). Article 5. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.157
3.
AdekoyaN.TrumanB.LandenM. (2015). Incidence of notifiable diseases among American Indians/Alaska Natives—United States, 2007–2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 64(1), 16. PMID: 25590681 PMCID: PMC4584794.
4.
BeansJ. A.HiratsukaV. Y.ApokC. R.CaindecK.DillardD. A.RobinsonR. F. (2018). Community dissemination in a Tribal health setting: A pharmacogenetics case study. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 25(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.5820/aian.2501.2018.80
5.
BearU. R.ThayerZ. M.CroyC. D.KaufmanC. E.MansonS. M.TeamA.-S. (2019). The impact of individual and parental American Indian boarding school attendance on chronic physical health of Northern Plains Tribes. Family & Community Health, 42(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000205
6.
BlacksherE. (2013). Participatory and deliberative practices in health: Meanings, distinctions, and implications for health equity. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.158
7.
BlacksherE.DiebelA.ForestP. G.GooldS. D.AbelsonJ. (2012). What is public deliberation?Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.26
8.
BlacksherE.HiratsukaV.BlanchardJ. W.LundJ.ReedyJ.BeansJ. A.SaunkeahB.PeercyM.ByarsC.YrachetaJ.TsosieK. S.O’LearyM.DucheneauxG.SpicerP. G. (2021). Deliberations with American Indian and Alaska Native People about the ethics of genomics: Three Tribal deliberations in the United States. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 12(3), 164–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2021.1925775
9.
BonhamV. L.CitrinT.ModellS. M.FranklinT. H.BleicherE. W.FleckL. M. (2009). Community-based dialogue: Engaging communities of color in the United States’ genetics policy conversation. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 34(3), 325–359. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-2009-009
10.
BoyerB. B.DillardD.WoodahlE. L.WhitenerR.ThummelK. E.BurkeW. (2011). Ethical issues in developing pharmacogenetic research partnerships with American Indigenous communities. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 89(3), 343–345. https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2010.303
11.
BurkhalterS.GastilJ.KelshawT. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face—to—face groups. Communication Theory, 12(4), 398–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00276.x
12.
Cacari-StoneL.WallersteinN.GarciaA. P.MinklerM. (2014). The promise of community-based participatory research for health equity: A conceptual model for bridging evidence with policy. Amrican Journal of Public Health, 104(9), 1615–1623. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2014.301961
13.
CarmanK. L.DardessP.MaurerM.SofaerS.AdamsK.BechtelC.SweeneyJ. (2013). Patient and family engagement: A framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Affairs (Millwood), 32(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133
14.
Carman, K. L., Mallery, C., Maurer, M., Wang, G., Garfinkel, S., Yang, M., Gilmore, D. , Windham, A., Ginsburg, M., Sofaer, S., Gold, M., Pathak-Sen, E., Davies, T., Siegel, J., Mangrum, R., Fernandez, J., Richmond, J., Fishkin, J., & Chao, A. (2015). Effectiveness of public deliberation methods for gathering input on issues in healthcare: Results from a randomized trial. Social Science & Medicine, 133, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.024
15.
Cashman, S. B., Adeky, S., Allen, A. J.III, Corburn, J., Israel, B. A., Montano, J., Rafelito, A., Rhodes, S. D., Swanston, S., Wallerstein, N., & Eng, E. (2008). The power and the promise: Working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes. American Journal of Public Health, 98(8), 1407–1417. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2007.113571
ClawK. G.AndersonM. Z.BegayR. L.TsosieK. S.FoxK.GarrisonN. (2018). A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w
18.
CollinsF. S.VarmusH. (2015). A new initiative on precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(9), 793–795. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1500523
DegelingC.CarterS. M.RychetnikL. (2015). Which public and why deliberate?--A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research. Social Science & Medicine, 131, 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.03.009
21.
DillardD. A.CaindecK.DirksL. G.HiratsukaV. Y. (2018). Challenges in engaging and disseminating health research results among Alaska Native and American Indian people in Southcentral Alaska. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 25(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.5820/aian.2501.2018.3
22.
DorfmanE. H.Brown TrinidadS.MoralesC. T.HowlettK.BurkeW.WoodahlE. L. (2015). Pharmacogenomics in diverse practice settings: implementation beyond major metropolitan areas. Pharmacogenomics, 16(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.14.174
23.
Fohner, A., Muzquiz, L. I., Austin, M. A., Gaedigk, A., Gordon, A., Thornton, T., Rieder, M. J., Pershouse, M. A., Putnam, E. A., Howlet, K., Beatty, P., & Woodahl, E. L. (2013). Pharmacogenetics in American Indian populations: Analysis of CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and CYP2C9 in the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, 23(8), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1097/FPC.0b013e3283629ce9
24.
Fohner, A. E., Robinson, R., Yracheta, J., Dillard, D. A., Schilling, B., Khan, B., Hopkins, S., Boyer, B., Black, J., Wiener, H., Tiwari, H. K., Gordon, A., Nickerson, D., Tsai, J. M., Farin, F., M., Thornton, T. A., Rettie, A., E., & Thummel, K. E. (2015). Variation in genes controlling warfarin disposition and response in American Indian and Alaska Native people: CYP2C9, VKORC1, CYP4F2, CYP4F11, GGCX. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, 25(7), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1097/fpc.0000000000000143
25.
Fohner, A. E., Wang, Z., Yracheta, J., O'Brien, D. M., Hopkins, S. E., Black, J., Philip, J., Wiener, H. W., Tiwari, H. K., Stapleton, P. L., Tsai, J. M., Thornton, T. A., Boyer, B. B., & Thummel, K. E. (2016). Genetics, diet, and season are associated with serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol concentration in a Yup’ik study population from Southwestern Alaska. Journal of Nutrition, 146(2), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.115.223388
26.
Frank, L., Basch, E., & Selby, J. V. (2014). The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA, 312(15), 1513–1514. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.11100
27.
FrankL.ForsytheL.EllisL.SchrandtS.SheridanS.GersonJ.KonopkaK.DaughertyS. (2015). Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Quality of Life Research, 24(5), 1033–1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0893-3
28.
FungA. (2005). Deliberation before the revolution: Toward an ethics of deliberative democracy in an unjust world. Political Theory, 33(3), 397–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591704271990
29.
GarrisonN. (2013). Genomic justice for Native Americans: Impact of the Havasupai case on genetic research. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912470009
30.
GoldbergD. (2017). Lessons from standing rock–of water, racism, and solidarity. New England Journal of Medicine, 376(15), 1403–1405. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1701248
31.
GooldS. D.BiddleA. K.KlippG.HallC. N.DanisM. (2005). Choosing Healthplans all together: A deliberative exercise for allocating limited health care resources. Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 30(4), 563–601. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-30-4-563
32.
GooldS. D.NebloM. A.KimS. Y.VriesR. D.RoweG.MuhlbergerP. (2012). What is good public deliberation?Hastings Center Report, 42(2), 24–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.29
HaozousE. A.NeherC. (2015). Best practices for effective clinical partnerships with indigenous populations of North America (American Indian, Alaska Native, First Nations, Metis, and Inuit). Nursing Clinics of North America, 50(3), 499–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnur.2015.05.005
35.
HaringR. C.HenryW. A.HudsonM.RodriguezE. M.TaualiiM. (2018). Views on clinical trial recruitment, biospecimen collection, and cancer research: Population science from landscapes of the Haudenosaunee (People of the Longhouse). Journal of Cancer Education, 33(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1067-5
36.
Hicks, S., Duran, B., Wallerstein, N., Avila, M., Belone, L., Lucero, J., Magarati, M., Mainer, E., Martin, D., Muhammad, M., Oetzel, J., Pearson, C., Sahota, P., Simonds, V., Sussman, A., Tafoya, G., & Hat, E. W. (2012). Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 6(3), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2012.0049
37.
HimD.A.FrederickA. (2019). Tribal IRBs: A framework for understanding research oversight in American Indian and Alaska Native communities. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 26(2), 71–95.
38.
HiratsukaV. Y.BeansJ. A.BlanchardJ. W.ReedyJ.BlacksherE.LundJ. R.SpicerP. G. (2020). An Alaska Native community’s views on genetic research, testing, and return of results: Results from a public deliberation. PloS ONE, 15(3), e0229540. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229540
39.
HoxieF. E. (2001). A final promise: The campaign to assimilate the Indians, 1880–1920 (Bison Books ed.). University of Nebraska Press.
40.
Institute of Medicine (2003). Who will keep the public healthy?: Educating public health professionals for the 21st century. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10542.
41.
Jacobs-WingoJ. L.EspeyD. K.GroomA. V.PhillipsL. E.HaverkampD. S.SandteL. (2016). Causes and disparities in death rates among urban American Indian and Alaska Native populations, 1999–2009. American Journal of Public Health, 106(5), 906–914. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.303033
42.
James, R., Tsosie, R., Sahota, P., Parker, M., Dillard, D., Sylvester, I., Lewis J., Klejka, J., Muzquiz, L., Olsen, P., Whitener, R., & Burke, W. (for the Kiana Group) (2014). Exploring pathways to trust: A Tribal perspective on data sharing. Genetics in Medicine, 16(11), 820–826. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.47
43.
James, R. D., West, K. M., Claw, K. G., EchoHawk, A., Dodge, L., Dominguez, A., Tauaili, M., Forquera, R., Thummel, K., & Burke W. (2018). Responsible research with urban American Indians and Alaska Natives. American Journal of Public Health, 108(12), 1613–1616. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2018.304708
44.
JonesL.WellsK. (2007). Strategies for academic and clinician engagement in community-participatory partnered research. JAMA, 297(4), 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.4.407
45.
KaiserJ. (2019). Million-person US study of genes and health stumbles over including Native American groups. Science (New York, N.Y.), 10. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay2081
46.
KarpowitzC. F.RaphaelC. (2014). Deliberation, democracy, and civic forums: Improving equality and publicity. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107110212
47.
KarpowitzC. F.RaphaelC.HammondA. S. (2009). Deliberative democracy and inequality: Two cheers for enclave deliberation among the disempowered. Politics & Society, 37(4), 576–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329209349226
48.
LehouxP.DaudelinG.AbelsonJ. (2012). The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes. Social Science & Medicine, 74(12), 1843–1850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.023
49.
LeighningerM. (2016). The economic argument for engagement: New directions for research. Journal of Public Deliberation, 12(2). Article 14. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.266
Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Estlund, D., Follesdal, A., Fung, A., Lafont C., Manin, B, & Luis Marti J. (2011). The place of self-interest and the role of power in deliberative democracy. Raisons Politiques, 42(2), 47–82. https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.042.0047
52.
MansbridgeJ.Hartz-KarpJ.AmengualM.GastilJ. (2006). Norms of deliberation: An inductive study. Journal of Public Deliberation, 2(1). Article 7. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.35
53.
MinS. J. (2014). On the Westerness of deliberation research. Journal of Public Deliberation, 10(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.207
54.
MinklerM.BlackwellA. G.ThompsonM.TamirH. (2003). Community-based participatory research: Implications for public health funding. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1210–1213. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.8.1210
55.
MonahanA.StewartD. E. (2003). The role of lay panelists on grant review panels. Chronic Diseases in Canada, 24(2–3), 70–74. PMID: 12959677.
56.
Morales, C. T., Muzquiz, L. I., Howlett, K., Azure, B., Bodnar, B., Finley, V., Incashola, T., Mathias, C., Laukes, C., Beatty, P., Burke, W., Pershouse M. A., Putnam, E. A., Trinidad, S., B., James R., & Woodahl, E. L. (2016). Partnership with the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes: Establishing an advisory committee for pharmacogenetic research. Progress in Community Health Partnerships, 10(2), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2016.0035
57.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2020). An examination of emerging bioethical issues in biomedical research: Proceedings of a workshop. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25778.
58.
OetzelJ. G.VillegasM.ZenoneH.White HatE. R.WallersteinN.DuranB. (2015). Enhancing stewardship of community-engaged research through governance. American Journal of Public Health, 105(6), 1161–1167. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2014.302457
RaisioH.CarsonL. (2014). Deliberation within sectors. Making the case for sector mini-publics. International Review of Social Research, 4(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/irsr-2014-0006
61.
Reedy, J., Blanchard, J. W., Lund, J., Spicer, P. G., Byars, C., Peercy, M., Saunkeah B., & Blacksher E. (2020a). Deliberations about genomic research and biobanks with citizens of the Chickasaw Nation. Frontiers in Genetics, 11, 466. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00466
62.
Reedy, J., Orr, R., Spicer, P., Blanchard, J. W., Hiratsuka, V. Y., Ketchum, T. S., Saunkeah, B., Wark, K., & Woodbury, R. B. (2020b). Deliberative democracy and historical perspectives on American Indian/Alaska native political decision-making practices. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0506-4
Schattan Ruas Pereira CoelhoV.WaisbichL. (2016). Participatory mechanisms and inequality reduction: Searching for plausible relations. Journal of Public Deliberation, 12(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.265
66.
ShawJ. L.RobinsonR.StarksH.BurkeW.DillardD. A. (2013). Risk, reward, and the double-edged sword: Perspectives on pharmacogenetic research and clinical testing among Alaska Native people. American Journal of Public Health, 103(12), 2220–2225. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2013.301596
67.
ShoreN.WongK. A.SeiferS. D.GrignonJ.GambleV. N. (2008). Introduction to special issue: Advancing the ethics of community-based participatory research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2008.3.2.1
68.
SunsteinC. R. (2000). Deliberative trouble? Why groups go to extremes. The Yale Law Journal, 110(1), 71–119. https://doi.org/10.2307/797587
69.
Tribal Collaboration Working Group (2018). Considerations for meaningful collaboration with Tribal populations: The Tribal collaboration working group report to the all of us research program advisory panel. National Institutes of Health. https://allofus.nih.gov/sites/default/files/tribal_collab_work_group_rept.pdf.
70.
TrinidadS. B.BlacksherE.WoodburyR. B.HopkinsS. E.WoodahlE. L.BurkeW.BoyerB. B.HiratsukaV. Y. (2021). Precision medicine research with American Indian and Alaska Native communities: Results of a deliberative engagement with Tribal leaders. Genetics in Medicine. S1098-3600(21)05380-6 (Advance online publication), pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2021.11.003.
71.
TsosieR. (2002). Reclaiming native stories: An essay on cultural appropriation and cultural rights. Ariz. St. LJ, 34, 299. Corpus ID: 142757418.
72.
Viswanathan, M., Ammerman, A., Eng, E., Garlehner, G., Lohr, K. N., Griffith, D., Rhodes, S., Samuel-Hodge, C., Maty, S., Lux, L., Webb, L., Sutton, T., Jackman, A., & Whitener, L. (2004). Community-based participatory research: Assessing the evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment (Summ), (99), 1–8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11852/
WangG.GoldM.SiegelJ.SofaerS.YangM.MalleryC.CarmanK. L. (2015). Deliberation: Obtaining informed input from a diverse public. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 26(1), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2015.0021
75.
WoodahlE. L.LeskoL. J.HopkinsS.RobinsonR. F.ThummelK. E.BurkeW. (2014). Pharmacogenetic research in partnership with American Indian and Alaska Native communities. Pharmacogenomics, 15(9), 1235–1241. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.14.91
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
