Knowledge and Attitudes of Research Participants in China Toward Electronic Informed Consent in Clinical Trials: A Cross Sectional Study

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the knowledge and attitudes of participants and potential participants in clinical trials toward electronic informed consent. We conducted a survey-based cross-sectional study in Hunan Province, China in March 2021. A total of 547 respondents were included in this study. All questions in an 8-item survey section assessing participants’ knowledge of electronic informed consent received correct answers from at least 70% of participants. In terms of attitude scores, most participants (86.3%) believed that electronic informed consent is more convenient than the paper-based version, and more than half (51.2%) believed that electronic informed consent could completely replace the paper-based version. Responses indicated that common concerns about electronic informed consent were its security and confidentiality, legal benefits, and implications for rights protection.

Keywords

knowledge attitude electronic consent informed consent clinical trial

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boutin

N. T.

Mathieu

Hoffnagle

A. G.

Allen

N. L.

Castro

V. M.

Morash

O'Rourke

P. P.

Hohmann

E. L.

Herring

Bry

Slaugenhaupt

S. A.

Karlson

E. W.

Weiss

S. T.

Smoller

J. W.

(2016). Implementation of electronic consent at a biobank: An opportunity for precision medicine research. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 6(2), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm6020017

CDE (2021). Guidelines for the management of drug clinical trials during the new crown pneumonia epidemic (draft for comments). Retrieved April 30, 2020, from https://www.cde.org.cn/main/news/viewInfoCommon/f7a2c8bc1cd47b2efd288e220087f691

Chen, C., Lee, P. I., Pain, K. J., Delgado, D., Cole, C. L., & Campion, T. R., Jr (2020). Replacing paper informed consent with electronic informed consent for research in academic medical centers: A scoping review. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, eCollection, 80–88. PMID: 32477626.

Cong

Rao

(2019). The application of electronic informed consent. Chinese Medical Ethics, 3, 328–331. https://chn.oversea.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2019&filename=XNLX201903010&uniplatform=OVERSEAS_CHS&v=eSbiR5BK8goF7Y0MbsdNZUCcECMLaj4PVmr8vfNf0XNe9htTceesgs6Iph0Pcnu-

De Sutter

Zace

Boccia

Di Pietro

M. L.

Geerts

Borry

Huys

(2020). Implementation of electronic informed consent in biomedical research and stakeholders' perspectives: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), e19129. https://doi.org/10.2196/19129

Dong

Qin

Tang

Long

Yang

Ling

(2021). The application and promotion of electronic informed consent. Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine, 7, 851–857. https://doi.org/10.7507/1672-2531.202102042

EMA (2021). Published first in 2020, updated 2021. Guidance on the management of clinical trials during the COVID-19 (coronavirus) pandemic. Retrieved February 4, 2021, from https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/guidance-sponsors-how-manage-clinical-trials-during-covid-19-pandemic

Eruchalu

C. N.

Pichardo

M. S.

Bharadwaj

Rodriguez

C. B.

Rodriguez

J. A.

Bergmark

R. W.

Bates

D. W.

Ortega

(2021). The expanding digital divide: Digital health access inequities during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York city. Journal of Urban Health, 98(2), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-020-00508-9

FDA (2016). Use of electronic informed consent in clinical investigations–questions and answers. Retrieved December 1, 2016, from https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/use-electronic-informed-consent-clinical-investigations-questions-and-answers

10.

FDA (2020). FDA guidance on conduct of clinical trials of medical products during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Retrieved January 27, 2021, from https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/fda-guidance-conduct-clinical-trials-medical-products-during-covid-19-public-health-emergency

11.

Golembiewski

E. H.

Mainous

A. G.

Rahmanian

K. P.

Brumback

Rooks

B. J.

Krieger

J. L.

Goodman

K. W.

Moseley

R. E.

Harle

C. A.

(2021). An electronic tool to support patient-centered broad consent: A multi-arm randomized clinical trial in family medicine. Annals of Family Medicine, 19(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2610

12.

Hallinan

Z. P.

Forrest

Uhlenbrauck

Young

McKinney

, Jr. (2016). Barriers to change in the informed consent process: A systematic literature review. IRB, 38(3), 1–10. PMID: 27301167.

13.

Harle

C. A.

Golembiewski

E. H.

Rahmanian

K. P.

Brumback

Krieger

J. L.

Goodman

K. W.

Mainous

A. G.

Moseley

R. E.

(2019). Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 26(7), 620–629. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz015

14.

Huang

Yang

Wang

(2019). Electronic informed consent: Difficulties and prospects. Chinese Medical Ethics, 11, 1410–1416. https://chn.oversea.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2019&filename=XNLX201911010&uniplatform=OVERSEAS_CHS&v=eSbiR5BK8gpP_MGbf1ciPSK69NR19WaH0G2uw9vTplunoKHzTrXVc3Vrgac3MUhr

15.

Lentz

Kennett

Perlmutter

Forrest

(2016). Paving the way to a more effective informed consent process: Recommendations from the clinical trials transformation initiative. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 49, 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2016.06.005

16.

Mitra

Lafrance

McCullough

(2001). Differences in attitudes between women and men toward computerization. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(3), 227–244. https://doi.org/10.2190/A5LK-KC6G-HPQH-XP52

17.

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1979). The Belmont Report. Retrieved March 15, 2016, from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/index.html

18.

National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China (2020). The Archives Law of the People's Republic of China. Retrieved June 20, 2020, from http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c30834/202006/14a5f4f6452a420a97ccf2d3217f6292.shtml

19.

Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law School (2021). Harvard catalyst. Retrieved May 15, 2021, from https://petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/research/catalyst

20.

Phillippi

J. C.

Doersam

J. K.

Neal

J. L.

Roumie

C. L.

(2018). Electronic informed consent to facilitate recruitment of pregnant women into research. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing, 47(4), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2018.04.134

21.

Rai

A. T.

Frei

(2020). A rationale and framework for seeking remote electronic or phone consent approval in endovascular stroke trials-special relevance in the COVID-19 environment and beyond. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery, 12(7), 654–657. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016221

22.

Rothwell

Wong

Rose

N. C.

Anderson

Fedor

Stark

L. A.

Botkin

J. R.

(2014). A randomized controlled trial of an electronic informed consent process. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(5), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614552627

23.

Sarkar

Karter

A. J.

Liu

J. Y.

Adler

N. E.

Nguyen

Lopez

Schillinger

(2011). Social disparities in internet patient portal use in diabetes: Evidence that the digital divide extends beyond access. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 18(3), 318–321. https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2010.006015

24.

Simon

C. M.

Schartz

H. A.

Rosenthal

G. E.

Eisenstein

E. L.

Klein

D. W.

(2018). Perspectives on electronic informed consent from patients underrepresented in research in the United States: A focus group study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 13(4), 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618773883

25.

Skelton

Drey

Rutherford

Ayers

Malamateniou

(2020). Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting. International Journal of Medical Informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 143, 104271–104271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104271

26.

Stevens

Edwards

Balayah

Hooper

Knowles

(2016). Risk based survey evidence supports electronic informed consent as a recruitment method for UK clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 77, 134–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.05.005

27.

Waclawski

E. R.

(2010). Health measurement scales—A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqp179