The global COVID-19 pandemic and quarantine/distancing measures have forced researchers to cope with a new situation. This paper aimed to analyze how the pandemic and its associated constraints have affected social researchers’ approach to research ethics. Drawing on an online qualitative survey with 193 Polish social researchers conducted in April and May 2020, we distinguished three approaches: nothing has changed, opportunity-oriented, and precautionary. According to the first, the pandemic was not regarded as a situation that required additional reflection on ethical issues or changes in research approaches. By contrast, the other two were based on the assumption that the pandemic affected research project ethics. The difference was in the assessment of changes in the area of ethics. The pandemic presented an opportunity and a threat to the ethicality of research, respectively. We discuss the implications of all three approaches for research and education.
BabbieE. (2014). The practice of social research. Cengage Learning.
2.
BraunV.ClarkeV.BoultonE.DaveyL.McEvoyC. (2020). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16(1–2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
3.
ChatfieldK.SchroederD. (2020). Ethical research in the COVID-19 era demands care, solidarity and trustworthiness. Research Ethics, 16(3-4), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120945046
4.
CrivelloG.FavaraM. (2021). COVID-19 and the ‘ethics of disruption’: Current dilemmas facing longitudinal research in low- and middle-income countries. Methodological Innovations, 14(1): 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799121994223
5.
ColnerudG. (2014). Ethical dilemmas in research in relation to ethical review: An empirical study. Research Ethics, 10(4), 238–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016114552339
6.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
7.
DoddsS.HessA. C. (2020). Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: Lessons for transformative service research. Journal of Service Management, 32(2), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153
8.
EllisC. (2007). Telling secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406294947
9.
HallJ.GavedM.SargentJ. (2021). Participatory research approaches in times of COVID-19: A narrative literature review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211010087
10.
HowlettM. (2021). Looking at the ‘field’ through a zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research. 1-16 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691
11.
HyytinenH.LöfströmE. (2017). Reactively, proactively, implicitly, explicitly? Academics’ pedagogical conceptions of how to promote research ethics and integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-016-9271-9
12.
KaufmannJ. C. (2007). L’Entretien compréhensiff [The comprehensive interview]. Armand Colin.
KwiekM. (2015). Uniwersytet w dobie przemian [The university in a time of change]. PWN.
15.
LawrenceL. (2020). Conducting cross-cultural qualitative interviews with mainland Chinese participants during COVID: Lessons from the field. Qualitative Research. 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120974157
16.
LobeB.MorganD.HoffmanK. A. (2020). Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875
MerrillB.WestL. (2009). Using biographical methods in social research. Sage Publications.
19.
MeskellP.HoughtonC.BiestyL. (2021). Opening windows behind closed doors: Reflections on working qualitatively during a pandemic. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211008313
20.
MwambariD.PurdekováA.Nyenyezi BisokaA. (2021). Covid-19 and research in conflict-affected contexts: Distanced methods and the digitalisation of suffering. Qualitative Research. 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794121999014
21.
NowakS. (2007). Metodologia badań społecznych (methodology of social sciences). PWN.
RavitchS. (2020). The best laid plans … Qualitative research design during COVID-19. Retrieved from: https://tinyurl.com/yx9r27kf.
24.
RobertsJ. K.PavlakisA. E.RichardsM. P. (2021). It's more complicated than it seems: Virtual qualitative research in the COVID-19 Era. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211002959
Surmiak, A. (2019). Komisje etyczne dla badań społecznych w Polsce. Perspektywa socjologów i antropologów społeczno-kulturowych (Envisaging Ethical Committees for Social Research in Poland. The Perspective of Sociologists and Socio-cultural Anthropologists). Studia Socjologiczne, 4(235), 157-182. https://doi.org/10.24425/sts.2019.126163
SwensonG.RollK. (2020). Theorizing risk and research: Methodological constraints and their consequences. PS: Political Science and Politics, 53(2), 286–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651900177X
29.
TetiM.SchatzE.LiebenbergL. (2020). Methods in the time of COVID-19: The vital role of qualitative inquiries. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19(51), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920920962
30.
TremblayS.CastiglioneS.AudetL.-A.DesmaraisM.HoraceM.PeláezS. (2021). Conducting qualitative research to respond to COVID-19 challenges: Reflections for the present and beyond. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211009679
31.
ValdezE. S.GubriumA. (2020). Shifting to virtual CBPR protocols in the time of coronavirus/COVID-19. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920982145
32.
World Council of Anthropological Associations (2020). Fieldwork in an era of pandemia: Digital (and other) alternatives. Retrieved from:https://www.waunet.org/wcaa/videos/.
