As part of a larger study, Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) members and managers were surveyed about their decision-making and views about social research studies with child participants. Responses of 229 HREC members and 42 HREC managers are reported. While most HREC members had received ethical training, HREC training and guidelines specific to research involving children were rare. Most applications involving children had to go through a full ethical review, but few adverse events were reported to HRECs regarding the conduct of the studies. Revisions to study proposals requested by HRECs were mostly related to consent processes and age-appropriate language. One-third of HREC members said that they would approve research on any topic. Most were also concerned that the methodology was appropriate, and the risks and benefits were clearly articulated. Specific training and guidance are needed to increase HREC members’ confidence to judge ethical research with children.
AbbottL.GradyC. (2011). A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: What We know and what We still need to learn. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.3
2.
BagleyS. J.ReynoldsW. W.NelsonR. M. (2007). Is a “wage-payment” model for research participation appropriate for children?Pediatrics, 119(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-1813
EganR.StockleyD.LamC. Y.KindermanL.YoumansA. S. (2016). Research ethics board (REB) Members’ preparation for, and perceived knowledge of research ethics. Journal of Academic Ethics, 14(3), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-016-9256-8
5.
EllonenN.PösöT. (2011). Children's experiences of completing a computer-based violence survey: Ethical implications. Children & Society, 25(6), 470–481. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2010.00292.x
6.
FinkelhorD.HambyS.TurnerH.WalshW. (2012). Ethical issues in surveys about children’s exposure to violence and sexual abuse. In CuevasC.RennisonC. (Eds.), Wiley handbook on the psychology of violence (pp. 24–48). Wiley-Blackwell Publishers.
7.
GuilleminM.GillamL.RosenthalD.BolithoA. (2012). Human research ethics committees: Examining their roles and practices. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(3), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.38
8.
GutaA.NixonS. A.WilsonM. G. (2013). Resisting the seduction of “ethics creep”: Using foucault to surface complexity and contradiction in research ethics review. Social Science & Medicine, 98, 301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.019
9.
HargerB.QuintelaM. (2017). The IRB as gatekeeper: Effects on research with children and youth. In Researching children and youth: Methodological issues, strategies, and innovations (pp. 11–33). Emerald Insights. Published online: 13 Mar 2017.
10.
HeadG. (2020). Ethics in educational research: Review boards, ethical issues and researcher development. European Educational Research Journal, 19(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904118796315
11.
LynchH. F. (2018). Opening closed doors: Promoting IRB transparency. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 46(1), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110518766028
12.
MeltonG. B.Ben-AriehA.CashmoreJ.GoodmanG. S.WorletN. K. (Eds.). (2014). The sage handbook of child research. SAGE, London.
13.
MooreT.McArthurM.GrahamA.ChalmersJ.PowellM.TaplinS. (2020). Children and young people’s decision-making in social research about sensitive issues. Children’s Geographies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2020.1866749.
14.
MooreT.Noble-CarrD.McArthurM. (2016). Changing things for the better: The use of children and young people’s reference groups in social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.989640
15.
MooreT.SaundersV.McArthurM. (2011). Championing choice—Lessons learned from children and young people about research and their involvement. Child Indicators Research, 4(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-010-9083-1
16.
MooreT. P.McArthurM.Noble-CarrD. (2018). More a marathon than a hurdle: Towards children’s informed consent in a study on safety. Qualitative Research, 18(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117700708
17.
MurrayC. (2005). Children and young people's participation and Non-participation in research. Adoption & Fostering, 29(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/030857590502900107
18.
NavratilJ.McCauleyH. L.MarmolM.BaroneJ.MillerE. (2015). Involving youth voices in research protocol reviews. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(11), 33–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1088979
PowellM. A.GrahamA.McArthurM.MooreT.ChalmersJ.TaplinS. (2020). Children’s participation in research on sensitive topics: Addressing concerns of decision-makers. Children's Geographies, 18(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2019.1639623
23.
PowellM. A.McArthurM.ChalmersJ.GrahamA.MooreT.SpriggsM.TaplinS. (2018). Sensitive topics in social research involving children. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(6), 647–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1462882
24.
SargeantJ. (2014). Adults’ perspectives on Tweens’ capacities: Participation or protection?Children Australia, 39(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/cha.2013.36
25.
ShahS.WhittleA.WilfondB.GenslerG.WendlerD. (2004). How Do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research?JAMA, 291(4), 476–482. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.4.476
26.
SilaigwanaB.WassenaarD. (2019). Research ethics Committees’ oversight of biomedical research in South Africa: A thematic analysis of ethical issues raised during ethics review of Non-expedited protocols. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264618824921
27.
TaplinS.ChalmersJ.HobanB.McArthurM.MooreT.GrahamA. (2019). Children in social research: Do higher payments encourage participation in riskier studies?Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 14(2), 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619826796
28.
Van EssenG. L.StoryD. A.PoustieS. J.GriffithsM. M. J.MarwoodC. L. (2004). Natural justice and human research ethics committees: An Australia-wide survey. Medical Journal of Australia, 180(2), 63–66. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05800.x
29.
WassenaarD. R.MamotteN. (2012). Ethical issues and ethics reviews in social science research. M. Leach, M. Stevens, G. Lindsay, A. Ferrero, & Y. Korkut (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international psychological ethics (pp. 268–282). New York: Oxford.
30.
WendlerD.RidA. (2017). In defense of a social value requirement for clinical research. Bioethics, 31(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12325
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
