Over the past 30 years, the scientific community has been increasingly challenged to provide the next generation of researchers with training in responsible conduct of research (RCR). Although RCR courses, workshops, and seminars are now routinely taught internationally, there is little uniformity in goals, content, pedagogy, duration, class size, or methods of assessment. The result is a mixed picture of effectiveness. In this manuscript, we describe goals, rationales, and features for a course tested and revised through well over 100 iterations. Based on our experience and that of others with whom we have shared this model, we propose this course as one that RCR instructors might readily and successfully adopt or adapt.
AbdiS.PizzolatoD.NemeryB.DierickxK. (2021). Educating PhD students in research integrity in Europe. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00290-0
2.
AntesA. L.MurphyS. T.WaplesE. P.MumfordM. D.BrownR. P.ConnellyS.DevenportL. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics and Behavior, 19(5), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420903035380
3.
BarrD.ChanD.GarfinkelS.HammattZ.IchikawaI.KalichmanM.LalaniE.LeeI. J.LeungF.MahE.MayerT.PalittapongarnpimP.SawickaT.ShamM. H.ShastriS.SunP.TaylorP.TzengO. (2020). First meeting in Asia of the Asia Pacific Research Integrity network. Accountability in Research, 27(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1715220
4.
BransfordJ.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9853. Accessed August 16, 2021.
5.
BrownP. C.RoedigerH. L.McDanielM. A. (2014). Make It stick: The science of successful learning. Belknap Press.
6.
DuboisJ. M.DuekerJ. M. (2009). Teaching and assessing the responsible conduct of research: A Delphi consensus panel report. Journal of Research Administration, 40(1), 49–70. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc3322664. Accessed August 16, 2021.
7.
KalichmanM. (2012). Why teach research ethics? Practical guidance on science and engineering ethics education for instructors and administrators. Papers and Summary from a Workshop December 12, 2012. The National Academies Press. https://www.nap.edu/read/18519/chapter/4. Accessed August 16, 2021.
KalichmanM. W. (2007). Responding to challenges in educating for the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 870–875. http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f77fe
KorenmanS. G.ShippA. C. (1994). Teaching the responsible conduct of research through a case study approach: A handbook for instructors. Association of American Medical Colleges.
MastroianniA. C.KahnJ. P. (1998). The importance of expanding current training in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 73(12), 1249–1254. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199812000-00013
15.
McIntoshT.AntesA. L.DuBoisJ. M. (2021). Navigating complex, ethical problems in professional life: A guide to teaching SMART strategies for decision-making. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(2), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09369-y
16.
McKeachieW. (1980). Class size, large classes, and multiple sections. Academe, 66(1), 24–27. http://doi.org/10.2307/40249328
17.
MumfordM. (2017). Appendix C, Assessing the Effectiveness of Responsible Conduct of Research Training: Key Findings and Viable Procedures. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; Committee on Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Public Policy; Committee on Responsible Science. Fostering Integrity in Research. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK475950. Accessed August 16, 2021.
18.
National Institutes of Health (1989). Requirement for programs on the responsible conduct of research in national research service award institutional training programs. NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, 18(45), 1. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/historical/1989_12_22_Vol_18_No_45.pdf. Accessed August 16, 2021.
19.
National Institutes of Health (2001). Notice of suspension of “PHS Policy on Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research.” NOTICE: OD-01-020. Release Date: February 22, 2001. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-01-020.html. Accessed August 16, 2021.
NovitzkyP.BernsteinM. J.BlokV.BraunR.ChanT. T.LamersW.LoeberA.MeijerI.LindnerR.GriesslermE. (2020). Improve alignment of research policy and societal values. Science (new York, N Y ), 369(6499), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3415.
PhillipsT.NestorF.BeachG.HeitmanE. (2018). America COMPETES at 5 years: An analysis of research-intensive Universities’ RCR training plans. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(1), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9883-5
25.
PimpleK. (2002). Six domains of research ethics. A heuristic framework for the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(2), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1
26.
ResnikD. B.DinseG. E. (2012). Do U.S. Research institutions meet or exceed federal mandates for instruction in responsible conduct of research? A national survey. Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1237–1242. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e318260fe5c
27.
RossouwT. M.van ZylC.PopeA. (2014). Responsible conduct of research: Global trends, local opportunities. South African Journal of Science, 110(1-2), 1–6. http://ref.scielo.org/2j483b. Accessed August 16, 2021.
28.
SteneckN. H.BulgerR. E. (2007). The history, purpose, and future of instruction in the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine, 82(9), 829–834. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0b013e31812f7d4d
