Understanding the Use of Optimal Formatting and Plain Language When Presenting Key Information in Clinical Trials

Abstract

Recent revisions to the Common Rule require that consent documents begin with a focused presentation of the study's key information that is organized to facilitate understanding. We surveyed 1,284 researchers working with older adults or individuals with Alzheimer's disease, supplemented with 60 qualitative interviews, to understand current use and barriers to using evidence-based formatting and plain language in key information. Researchers reported using formatting in 42% of their key information sections, and plain language in 63% of their key information sections. Perceived barriers included lack of knowledge, Institutional Review Board, other members of their team, and the burden associated with implementation. Education and training are required to increase adoption of the practices.

Keywords

informed consent key information formatting plain language evidence-based health communication research ethics implementation science

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Agre

Campbell

F. A.

Goldman

B. D.

Kass

N. E.

Boccia

M. L.

McCullough

L. B.

Merz

J. F.

Miller

S. M.

Mintz

Rapkin

Sugarman

Sorenson

Wirshing

, (2003). Improving informed consent: The medium is not the message. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, Suppl 25(5), S11–S19. https://doi.org/10.2307/3564117.

Ajzen

(1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

Association of American Medical Colleges. (2020). AAMC Medical School Members. https://members.aamc.org/eweb/DynamicPage.aspx?site=AAMC&webcode=AAMCOrgSearchResult&orgtype=Medical%20School.

Beardsley

Jefford

Mileshkin

(2007). Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: So Why are they lengthening? Journal of Clinical Oncology, 25(9), e13–e14. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3341.

Berkman

N. D.

Sheridan

S. L.

Donahue

K. E.

Halpern

D. J.

Crotty

(2011). Low health literacy and health outcomes: An updated systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005.

Campbell

F. A.

Goldman

B. D.

Boccia

M. L.

Skinner

(2004). The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: A comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentations. Patient Education and Counseling, 53(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00162-9.

Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative. (2016). Improving Public Access to Aggregate Content of ClinicalTrials.gov. https://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/.

Creswell

J. W.

(2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Crowne

D. P.

Marlowe

(1960). A New scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(4), 349–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047358.

10.

Damschroder

L. J.

Aron

D. C.

Keith

R. E.

Kirsh

S. R.

Alexander

J. A.

Lowery

J. C.

(2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.

11.

Davis

T. C.

Berkel

H. J.

Holcombe

R. F.

Pramanik

Divers

S. G.

(1998). Informed consent for clinical trials: A comparative study of standard versus simplified forms. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90(9), 668–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/90.9.668.

12.

Department of Health and Human Services. (2018). Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (45 CFR 46). https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&SID=83cd09e1c0f5c6937cd9d7513160fc3f&pitd=20180719&n=pt45.1.46&r=PART&ty=HTML.

13.

Directorate-General for Translation. (2011). How to Write Clearly. https://doi.org/10.2782/29211.

14.

DuBois

J. M.

Antes

A. L.

(2018). Five Dimensions of Research Ethics: A Stakeholder Framework for Creating a Climate of Research Integrity. Academic Medicine, 93(4), 550–555. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001966.

15.

DuBois

J. M.

Chibnall

J. T.

Gibbs

J. C.

(2015). Compliance disengagement in research: Development and validation of a new measure. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(4), 965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9681-x.

16.

DuBois

J. M.

Chibnall

J. T.

Tait

R. C.

Vander Wal

J. S.

Baldwin

K. A.

Antes

A. L.

Mumford

M. D.

(2015). Professional Decision-Making in Research (PDR): The Validity of a New Measure. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(2), 391–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9667-8.

17.

English

Antes

A. L.

Baldwin

K. A.

DuBois

J. M.

(2017). Development and preliminary validation of a new measure of values in scientific work. Science and Engineering Ethics . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9896-0.

18.

Faden

R. R.

Beauchamp

T. L.

(1986). A history and theory of informed consent. Oxford University Press.

19.

Fixsen

Naoom

S. F.

Blase

K. A.

Friedman

R. M.

Wallace

(2005). Implementation Research: A Synthesis of the Literature. http://ctndisseminationlibrary.org/PDF/nirnmonograph.pdf.

20.

Flory

Emanuel

E. J.

(2004). Interventions to improve research Participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(13), 1593–1601. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.292.13.1593.

21.

Foe

Larson

E. L.

(2016). Reading level and comprehension of research consent forms: An integrative review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 11(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616637483.

22.

Graham

I. D.

Logan

(2004). Innovations in knowledge transfer and continuity of care. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 36(2), 89–103.

23.

Holmes-Rovner

Stableford

Fagerlin

Wei

J. T.

Dunn

R. L.

Ohene-Frempong

Kelly-Blake

Rovner

D. R.

(2005). Evidence-based patient choice: A prostate cancer decision aid in plain language. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 5(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-5-16.

24.

Iltis

A. S.

Misra

Dunn

L. B.

Brown

G. K.

Campbell

Earll

S. A.

Glowinski

Hadley

W. B.

Pies

DuBois

J. M.

(2013). Addressing risks to advance mental health research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 70(12), 1363–1371. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2105.

25.

Jefford

Mileshkin

Raunow

O’Kane

Cavicchiolo

Brasier

Robinson

Matthews

Reynolds

(2005). Satisfaction with the decision to participate in cancer clinical trials (CCT) is high, but understanding is a problem. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(16_suppl), 6067. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2005.23.16_suppl.6067.

26.

Jefford

Moore

(2008). Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. The Lancet Oncology, 9(5), 485–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70128-1.

27.

Joffe

Cook

E. F.

Cleary

P. D.

Clark

J. W.

Weeks

J. C.

(2001). Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. The Lancet, 358(9295), 1772–1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06805-2.

28.

Kilbourne

A. M.

Neumann

M. S.

Pincus

H. A.

Bauer

M. S.

Stall

(2007). Implementing evidence-based interventions in health care: Application of the replicating effective programs framework. Implementation Science, 2(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-42.

29.

Kim

E. J.

Kim

S. H.

(2015). Simplification improves understanding of informed consent information in clinical trials regardless of health literacy level. Clinical Trials, 12(3), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774515571139.

30.

Kitson

Ahmed

L. B.

Harvey

Seers

Thompson

D. R.

(1996). From research to practice: One organizational model for promoting research-based practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(3), 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00003.x.

31.

Kutner

Greenberg

Baer

(2005). National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NAAL). https://nces.ed.gov/NAAL/PDF/2006470.PDF.

32.

Larson

E. L.

Foe

Lally

(2015). Reading level and length of written research consent forms. Clinical and Translational Science, 8(4), 355–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12253.

33.

Larson

E. L.

Teller

Aguirre

A. N.

Jackson

Meyer

D. D.

(2017). Assessing usefulness and researcher satisfaction with consent form templates. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 1(4), 256–259. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2017.296.

34.

Leiner

D. J.

(2019). Too fast, too straight, too weird: Non-reactive indicators for meaningless data in internet surveys. Survey Research Methods, 13(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2019.v13i3.7403.

35.

Mendel

Meredith

L. S.

Schoenbaum

Sherbourne

C. D.

Wells

K. B.

(2008). Interventions in organizational and community context: A framework for building evidence on dissemination and implementation in health services research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 35(1–2), 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-007-0144-9.

36.

Montalvo

Larson

(2014). Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 46(6), 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12097.

37.

Mozersky

Wroblewski

M. P.

Solomon

E. D.

DuBois

J. M.

(2020). How are US institutions implementing the new key information requirement? Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 4, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.1.

38.

National Institute on Aging. (2019). Alzheimer’s Disease Research Centers. https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/alzheimers-disease-research-centers.

39.

National Institutes of Health. (2019). Inclusion across the lifespan. https://grants.nih.gov/policy/inclusion/lifespan.htm.

40.

Nishimura

Carey

Erwin

P. J.

Tilburt

J. C.

Murad

M. H.

McCormick

J. B.

(2013). Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: A systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Medical Ethics, 14, 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-14-28.

41.

Paasche-Orlow

M. K.

Brancati

F. L.

Taylor

H. A.

Jain

Pandit

Wolf

(2013). Readability of consent form templates: A second Look. IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 35(4), 12–19.

42.

Pettigrew

Whipp

(1992). Managing change and corporate performance. In European industrial restructuring in the 1990s (pp. 227-265). Palgrave Macmillan.

43.

The Plain Language Action and Information Network. (2011). Federal Plain Language Guidelines. https://www.plainlanguage.gov/guidelines/.

44.

Plain Language Association International. (2008). PLAIN. plainlanguagenetwork.org.

45.

Plassman

B. L.

Langa

K. M.

Fisher

G. G.

Heeringa

S. G.

Weir

D. R.

Ofstedal

M. B.

Burke

J. R.

Hurd

M. D.

Potter

G. G.

Rodgers

W. L.

Steffens

D. C.

McArdle

J. J.

Willis

R. J.

Wallace

R. B.

, (2008). Prevalence of cognitive impairment without dementia in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine, 148(6), 427–434. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00005.

46.

Prusaczyk

Cherney

S. M.

Carpenter

C. R.

DuBois

J. M.

(2017). Informed consent to research with cognitively impaired adults: Transdisciplinary challenges and opportunities. Clinical Gerontologist, 40(1), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2016.1201714.

47.

Rubright

Sankar

Casarett

D. J.

Gur

Xie

S. X.

Karlawish

J. H.

(2010). A memory and organizational Aid improves Alzheimer disease research consent capacity: Results of a randomized controlled trial. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(12), 1124–1132. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181dd1c3b.

48.

Saldaña

(2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.

49.

The Secretary's Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections. (2018). New “Key Information” Informed Consent Requirements. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sachrp-committee/recommendations/attachment-c-november-13-2018/index.html.

50.

Stetler

C. B.

(2001). Updating the stetler model of research utilization to facilitate evidence-based practice. Nursing Outlook, 49(6), 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1067/mno.2001.120517.

51.

Taylor

J. S.

DeMers

S. M.

Vig

E. K.

Borson

(2012). The disappearing subject: Exclusion of people with cognitive impairment and dementia from geriatrics research. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 60(3), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03847.x.