Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In the South African Individual Deprivation Measure, the individual survey, included questions about two potentially highly sensitive topics—individuals' experience of violence and their control over personal decision making. In-depth follow-up interviews were conducted with 105 consenting survey participants to determine whether participating in the survey resulted in negative impacts for individuals, particularly in relation to these two topics. Several participants found that being asked about their experiences resurfaced painful memories, but we did not find any evidence that the approach of surveying every eligible individual in the dwelling resulted in any form of harm for the survey participants.

Keywords

sensitive topics violence control over personal decision making research participation harm human participants research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Black

M. C.

Kresnow

M. J.

Simon

T. R.

Arias

Shelley

(2006). Telephone survey respondents’ reactions to questions regarding interpersonal violence. Violence and Victims, 21(4), 445–459.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

CIOMS. (2002). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects . Retrieved from Geneva: https://cioms.ch/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/International_Ethical_Guidelines_for_Biomedical_Research_Involving_Human_Subjects.pdf

Dennis

B. K.

(2014). Understanding participant experiences: Reflections of a novice research participant. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 13(1), 395–410.

Deprince

A. P.

Freyd

J. J.

(2006). Costs and benefits of being asked about trauma history. Journal of Trauma Practice, 3(4), 23–35. doi:10.1300/J189v03n04_02

Devries

K. M.

Child

J. C.

Elbourne

Naker

Heise

(2015). “I never expected that it would happen, coming to ask me such questions”: Ethical aspects of asking children about violence in resource poor settings. Trials, 16(1), 1–12.

Dickson-Swift

James

E. L.

Liamputtong

(2008). Undertaking sensitive research in the health and social sciences: Managing boundaries, emotions and Risks. Cambridge University Press.

Ellsberg

Heise

(2002). Bearing witness: Ethics in domestic violence research. The Lancet, 359(9317), 1599–1604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08521-5

Ellsberg

Heise

Pena

Agurto

Winkvist

(2001). Researching domestic violence against women: Methodological and ethical considerations. Studies In Family Planning, 32(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00001.x

10.

Fontes

L. A.

(2004). Ethics in violence against women research: The sensitive, the dangerous, and the overlooked. Ethics & Behavior, 14(2), 141–174. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1402_4

11.

García-Moreno

Jansen

H. A. F. M.

Ellsberg

Heise

Watts

(2005). WHO Multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women . Initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women ’s responses. Retrieved from Geneva: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/violence/24159358X/en/

12.

Griffin

M. G.

Resick

P. A.

Waldrop

A. E.

Mechanic

M. B.

(2003). Participation in trauma research: Is there evidence of harm? Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(3), 221–227. doi:10.1023/A:1023735821900

13.

Hunt

Bessell

Crawford

Fisk

Nguyen

Pham

Suich

Yap

. (2017). Individual deprivation measure . Methodology Update 2017 (978-1-925286-24-3). Retrieved from Canberra, Melbourne: http://www.individualdeprivationmeasure.org/wp-content/uploads/Methodology_Update_2017_FINAL_print-friendly.pdf

14.

Jewkes

Wagman

(2007). Generating needed evidence while protecting women research participants in a study of domestic violence in South Africa: A fine balance. In Lavery

Wahl

Grady

Emanuel

(Eds.), Ethical issues in international biomedical research: A casebook (pp. 350–355). OUP.

15.

Jewkes

Nduna

Levin

Jama

Dunkle

Khuzwayo

Duvvury

(2006). A cluster randomized-controlled trial to determine the effectiveness of stepping stones in preventing HIV infections and promoting safer sexual behaviour amongst youth in the rural Eastern Cape, South Africa: Trial design, methods and baseline findings. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 11(1), 3–16. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01530.x

16.

Jewkes

Watts

Abrahams

Penn-Kekana

Garcia-Moreno

(2000). Ethical and methodological issues in conducting research on gender-based violence in Southern Africa. Reproductive Health Matters, 8(15), 93–103. doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(00)90010-7

17.

Johnson

L. E.

Benight

C. C.

(2003). Effects of trauma-focused research on recent domestic violence survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16(6), 567–571. doi:10.1023/B:JOTS.0000004080.50361.f3

18.

Jorm

A. F.

Kelly

C. M.

Morgan

A. J.

(2007). Participant distress in psychiatric research: A systematic review. Psychological Medicine, 37(7), 917–926. doi:10.1017/S0033291706009779

19.

Kuyper

de Wit

Adam

Woertman

(2012). Doing more good than harm? The effects of participation in sex research on young people in the Netherlands. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41(2), 497–506. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9780-y

20.

Machisa

Jewkes

Morna

Rama

. (2011). The war at home: Gender based violence indicators project. Gender Links and the South African Medical Research Council, Johannesburg, South Africa .

21.

McClinton Appollis

Lund

de Vries

P. J.

Mathews

(2014). Adolescents’ and Adults’ experiences of being surveyed about violence and abuse: A systematic review of Harms, benefits, and regrets. American Journal Of Public Health, 105(2), e31–e45. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302293

22.

Meer

Combrinck

(2017). Help, harm or hinder? Non-governmental service providers’ perspectives on families and gender-based violence against women with intellectual disabilities in South Africa. Disability & Society, 32(1), 37–55.

23.

Namy

Dartnall

(2020). Knowledge exchange: Pivoting to remote research on violence against women during COVID-19 . Retrieved from Pretoria: https://www.svri.org/sites/default/files/attachments/2020-07-23/SVRI%20Knowledge%20Exchange%20-%20Research%20VAW%20COVID%20-%20Final.pdf

24.

Newman

Walker

E. A.

Gefland

(1999). Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research. General Hospital Psychiatry, 21(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-8343(99)00011-0

25.

Nowell

L. S.

Norris

J. M.

White

D. E.

Moules

N. J

. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847

26.

Savell

J. K.

Kinder

B. N.

Young

M. S.

(2006). Effects of administering sexually explicit questionnaires on anger, anxiety, and depression in sexually abused and nonabused females: Implications for risk assessment. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 32(2), 161–172. doi:10.1080/00926230500442326

27.

Siagan

Arifiani

S. D.

Bessell

Przybyszewski

W. E.

(2020). Survey respondents’ experiences of being asked about voice, violence, and other potentially sensitive issues: The qualitative follow-up study to the individual deprivation measure (IDM) survey in Indonesia. Retrieved from Canberra: https://www.individualdeprivationmeasure.org/wp-content/uploads/Qualitative-follow-up-IDM-Indonesia.pdf

28.

Sikweyiya

Jewkes

(2012). Perceptions and experiences of research participants on gender-based violence community based survey: Implications for ethical guidelines. PLoS One, 7(4), e35495.

29.

Sikweyiya

Jewkes

Morrell

(2007). Talking about rape: South African men's responses to questions about rape. Agenda, 21(74), 48–57.

30.

Stats

. (2018). Crime against women in South Africa . An in-depth analysis of the Victims of Crime survey data. Retrieved from Pretoria: http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/Report-03-40-05/Report-03-40-05June2018.pdf

31.

Suich

Pham

Hunt

(2020). Revised results of indicators, themes and dimensions, overall and by subgroup analysis, South Africa country study main sample (v2) . Retrieved from Canberra: https://www.individualdeprivationmeasure.org/resources/rsa-revised-tables/

32.

Van Niekerk

Tonsing

Seedat

Jacobs

Ratele

McClure

(2015). The invisibility of men in South African violence prevention policy: National prioritization, male vulnerability, and framing prevention. Global Health Action, 8(1), 27649.

33.

Walker

E. A.

Newman

Koss

Bernstein

(1997). Does the study of victimization revictimize the victims? General Hospital Psychiatry, 19(6), 403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-8343(97)00061-3

34.

Wasunna

(2007). Minimizing the risk to women in a study of domestic violence in South Africa: Easier said than done. In Lavery

Wahl

Grady

Emanuel

(Eds.), Ethical issues in international biomedical research: A casebook (pp. 355–359). OUP.

35.

WGDS. (ud). The Washington group short set of questions on disability. Washington Group on Disability Statistics. https://www.washingtongroup-disability.com/question-sets/wg-short-set-on-functioning-wg-ss/

36.

WHO. (2001). Putting women first: Ethical and safety recommendations for research on domestic violence agianst women . Retrieved from Geneva: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/65893/WHO_FCH_GWH_01.1.pdf?sequence=1

Examining the Risks of Engaging in Population-based Surveys on Violence: Follow-up Study of the Individual Deprivation Measure in South Africa

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References