CreswellJ. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
2.
DunnM.SheehanM.HopeT.ParkerM. (2012). Toward methodological innovation in empirical ethics research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 21, 466-480. doi:10.1017/S0963180112000242
3.
GreenJ.ThorogoodN. (2009). Qualitative methods for health research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
4.
HedgecoeA. (2004). Critical Bioethics: Beyond the Social Science Critique of Applied Ethics. Bioethics, 18, 121-143.
5.
IphofenR.TolichM. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research ethics (1st ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
6.
IsraelM.HayI. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists: Between ethical conduct and regulatory compliance. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
7.
IvesJ.DunnM.CribbA. (2017). Empirical bioethics: Theoretical and practical perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
IvesJ.DunnM.MolewijkB.SchildmannJ.BærøeK.FrithL.. . . WiddershovenG. (2018). Standards of practice in empirical bioethics research: Towards a consensus. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1), Article 68. doi:10.1186/s12910-018-0304-3
9.
MertzM.InthornJ.RenzG.RothenbergerL. G.SallochS.SchildmannJ.WöhlkeS.SchicktanzS. (2014). Research across the disciplines: A road map for quality criteria in empirical ethics research. BMC Medical Ethics, 15, Article 17. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-17
10.
MolewijkB.StiggelboutA. M.OttenW.DupuisH. M.KievitJ. (2004). Empirical data and moral theory. A plea for integrated empirical ethics. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 7(1), 55-69. doi:10.1023/B:MHEP.0000021848.75590.b0
11.
MusschengaA. W. (2005). Empirical ethics, context-sensitivity, and contextualism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 30, 467-490. doi:10.1080/03605310500253030
12.
PelsP. (1999). Professions of Duplexity: A prehistory of ethical codes in anthropology. Current Anthropology, 40, 101-136. doi:10.1086/200001
13.
PollockK. (2012). Procedure versus process: Ethical paradigms and the conduct of qualitative research. BMC Medical Ethics, 13, Article 25. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-13-25
14.
ScullyJ. L. (2017). Feminist empirical bioethics. In IvesJ.DunnM.CribbA. (Eds.), Empirical bioethics (pp. 195-222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
SieberJ. E. (1998). Planning ethically responsible research. In BickmanD.RogJ. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 127-156). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
16.
StarkL.HedgecoeA. (2011). A practical guide to research ethics. In BourgeaultI.DingwallR.de VriesR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research (pp. 589-608). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
17.
SulmasyD. P.SugarmanJ. (2010). The many methods of medical ethics (Or, thirteen ways of looking at a blackbird). In SugarmanJ.SulmasyD. P. (Eds.), Methods in medical ethics (2nd ed.), (pp. 3-20). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
18.
WiddershovenG.McMillanJ.HopeT.van der ScheerL. (2008). Empirical ethics in psychiatry. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
WiddershovenG.van der ScheerL. (2008). Theory and methodology of empirical ethics: A pragmatic hermeneutic perspective. In WiddershovenG.McMillanJ.HopeT.van der ScheerL. (Eds.), Empirical ethics in psychiatry (pp. 23-56). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.