CampbellM. M.SusserE.De VriesJ.BaldingerA.SibekoG.MndiniM.. . . SteinD. (2015). Exploring researchers’ experiences of working with a researcher-driven, population-specific community advisory board in a South African schizophrenia genomics study. BMC Medical Ethics, 16, Article 45. doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0037-5
2.
MweembaC.AliJ.HyderA. A. (2018). Providing monetary and non-monetary goods to research participants: Perspectives and practices of researchers and Research Ethics Committees in Zambia. Global Bioethics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/11287462.2018.1527672
3.
National Health Research Ethics Council. (2012). Guidelines for payment of trial participants in South Africa: Ethical considerations for Research Ethics Committees (RECs). Pretoria, South Africa.
4.
OgunrinO.WoolfallK.GabbayM.FrithL. (2018). Correction: Relative solidarity: Conceptualising communal participation in genomic research among potential research participants in a developing Sub-Saharan African setting. PLoS ONE, 13(6), e0199514. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199514
5.
RipleyE.MacrinaF.MarkowitzM.GenningsC. (2010). Why do we pay? A national survey of investigators and IRB chairpersons. Journal of Empirical Human Research Ethics, 5(3), 43-56. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.43
6.
TindanaP. O.De VriesJ.CampbellM.LittlerK.SeeleyJ.MarshallP.. . . ParkerM. (2015). Community engagement strategies for genomic studies in Africa: A review of the literature. BMC Medical Ethics, 16, Article 24. doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0014-z
7.
TindanaP. O.SinghJ. A.TracyC. S.UpshurR. E.DaarA. S.SingerP. A.. . . LaveryJ. V. (2007). Grand challenges in global health: Community engagement in research in developing countries. PLoS Medicine, 4(9), e273. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040273