Applications for Research Concerning Fetal or Placental Tissue and Expected Institutional Review Board Responses

Abstract

Proposals for research concerning fetal and/or placental tissue may be refused institutional review board (IRB) review, effectively preventing the research from occurring. We conducted an anonymous electronic survey of IRB chairs to determine their assessment of the likely response to research projects using fetal/placental tissue obtained from various procedures. We found that proposals concerning tissue obtained from diagnostic procedures or miscarriage were anticipated to be considered at most institutions. Tissue obtained after abortion was likely to be refused consideration by more than 25% of respondents. Additional consultation during review was anticipated for up to 30% of scenarios. Responses for fetal and placental tissue were similar. The most frequently anticipated reason for refusal was institutional policy.

Keywords

fetal tissue placental tissue research abortion miscarriage institutional review board

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott

Grady

(2011). A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: What we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(1), 3-19. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.3

Boonstra

H. D.

(2016). Fetal tissue research: A weapon and a casualty in the war against abortion. Guttmacher Policy Review, 19, 9-15.

Catania

J. A.

Wolf

L. E.

Dolcini

M. M.

Pollack

L. M.

Barker

J. C.

. . . Henn

(2008). Survey of U.S. human research protection organizations: Workload and membership. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 3(4), 57-69. doi: 10.1525/jer.2008.3.4.57

Charo

R. A.

(2015). Fetal tissue fall-out. The New England Journal of Medicine, 373 (10), 890-8911. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1510279

Gelber

S. E.

McCullough

L. B.

Chervenak

F. A.

(2015). Fetal tissue research: An ongoing story of professionally responsible success. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 213 (6), 819.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.079

Harris

L. H.

(2013). Abortion politics and the production of knowledge. Contraception, 88 (2), 200-203. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.05.013

NIH Revitalization Act of 1993, U.S.C. Pub. L. No. 103-43, 107 Stat. 122 (June 10, 1993) (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 289g-1 and g-2 (2006)).

Ostrer

Wilson

D. I.

Hanley

N. A.

(2006). Human embryo and early fetus research. Clinical Genetics, 70 (2), 98-107.

Seifert

C. A.

(1997). Fetal tissue research: State regulation of the donation of aborted fetuses without the consent of the mother. Marshall Law Review, 31, 277-298.

10.

Tuch

B. E.

Scott

Armati

P. J.

Tabiin

M. T.

Wang

L. T.

(2003). Use of human fetal tissue for biomedical research in Australia, 1994–2002. Medical Journal of Australia, 179(10), 547-550.

11.

Wagner

T. H.

Cruz

A. M.

Chadwick

G. L.

(2004). Economies of scale in institutional review boards. Medical Care, 42(8), 817-823.