Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Chapter 8 of the South African National Health Act 61 of 2003 (NHA) that deals with the donation of human tissue was promulgated in 2012. The new Act is perceived to impose restrictions on low-risk research involving human remains. This study aimed to identify the issues raised by a research ethics committee (REC) when reviewing protocols where human remains are used as data source. REC minutes from 2009 to 2014 were reviewed, and issues raised by the committee were categorized. In total, 127 protocols submitted to the committee over 6 years involved human remains. Queries relating to science (22.2%) and administration (18.9%) were the most common, whereas queries relating to legal issues constituted only 10.2%. Ethical issues centered on informed consent regarding sensitive topics such as HIV, DNA, and deceased children. The change in legislation did not change the number or type of legal issues identified by the REC.

Keywords

research ethics human remains National Health Act research ethics committee review process legislation South Africa developing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Angell

Dixon-Woods

(2009). Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval? Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 130-132. doi:1136/jmw.2008.025940

Angell

Tarrant

Dixon-Woods

(2009). Research involving storage and use of human tissue: How did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees? Journal of Clinical Pathology, 62, 825-829. doi:10.1136/jcp.2008.060699

Chamberlain

(2008). Human tissue research. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 22(4), 167-168.

Clarke

D. L.

(2014). Auditing the process of ethics approval for master’s degrees at a South African university. South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 7(1), 23-25. doi:10.7196/SAJBL.301

Cleaton-Jones

(2010). Process error rates in general research applications to the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) at the University of the Witwatersrand: A secondary data analysis. South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 3(1), 20-24.

Cleaton-Jones

Grossman

E. S.

(2015). Things may not be as expected: Surprising findings when updating workload at the Wits Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical). South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 8(1), 14-21.

Cleaton-Jones

Vorster

(2008). Workload of a South African university-based health research ethics committee in 2003 and 2007. South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 1(2), 38-43.

Department of Health. (2015). Ethics in health research: Principles, processes and structures (2nd ed.). Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Health.

Emanuel

E. J.

Wendler

Grady

(2000). What makes clinical research ethical? Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 2701-2711.

10.

Mahomed

Nöthling-Slabbert

Pepper

M. S.

(2013). The legal position on the classification of human tissue in South Africa: Can tissues be owned? South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 6(1), 16-20. doi:10.7196/sajbl.258

11.

Nienaber

(2011). Consent to and authorisation of the export and use of human biological specimens for future research—Perspectives from three African countries. Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa, 44, 225-254.

12.

Ritchie

Spencer

(1994). Chapter 12: Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In Bryman

Burgess

R. G.

(Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173-194). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Books Ltd.

13.

Satyapal

K. S.

(2012). The treatment of human remains. South African Journal of Bioethics & Law, 5(1), 55-59. doi:10.7196/sajbl.196

14.

South African Criminal Procedures. Act 51 of 1977.

15.

South African Human Tissue Act. No. 65 of 1983.

16.

South African Inquests Act 58 of 1959.

17.

South African National Health Act. No. 61 of 2003.

18.

Tsoka-Gwegweni

J. M.

Wassenaar

D. R.

(2014). Using the Emanuel et al. Framework to assess ethical issues raised by a biomedical research ethics committee in South Africa. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(5), 36-45. doi:10.1177/1556264614553172/jre.sagepub.com

Ethical Issues Surrounding the Use of Modern Human Remains for Research in South Africa

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References