This article seeks to commence and encourage discussion around the upcoming ethical challenges of virality in network structures. When the call for participation in a research project on lupus in Ireland went from an advertisement in a newsletter to a meme (unit of transmissible information) on a closed Facebook page, the ethical considerations of virality were raised. The article analyzes the Association of Internet Researchers guidelines, Facebook policies, and the context of privacy in relation to virality. Virality creates the leverage for methodological pluralism. The nature of the inquiry can determine the method rather than the other way around. Viral ethical considerations are evolving due to the cyber world becoming the primary meme of communication, with flexibility in the researcher’s protocol providing opportunities for efficient, cost-effective, and diverse recruitment.
AbdesslemF. B.ParrisI.HendersonT. (2010, September6). Mobile experience sampling: Reaching the parts of Facebook other methods cannot reach. Privacy and Usability Methods Pow-Wow (PUMP), Dundee, UK.
AralS.WalkerD. (2011). Creating social contagion through viral product design: A randomized trial of peer influence in networks. Management Science, 57, 1623-1639.
FennerY.GarlandS. M.MooreE. E.JayasingheY.FletcherA.TabriziS. N.. . .WarkJ. D. (2012). Web-based recruiting for health research using a Social Networking Site: An exploratory study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, e20.
11.
KarpfD. (2012). Social science research methods in internet time. Information, Communication and Society, 15, 639-661.
12.
KitsakM.GallosL. K.HavlinS.LiljerosF.MuchnikL.StanleyH. E.MakseH. A. (2010). Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nature Physics, 6, 888-893.
MortonL. M.CahillJ.HartageP. (2006). Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: A survey of practice. American Journal of Epidemiology, 163, 197-203.
18.
NissenbaumN. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
19.
RobinsonJ. L.FuerchJ. H.WiniewiczD. D.SalvyS. J.RoemmichJ. N.EpsteinL. H. (2007). Cost effectiveness of recruitment methods in an obesity prevention trial for young children. Preventative Medicine, 44, 499-503.
20.
SmithR. (1997). Still blowing in the wind: The American quest for a democratic, scientific political science. Daedalus, 126, 253-287.
21.
SzaboG.HubermanB. A. (2010). Predicting the popularity of online content. Communications of the ACM, 53, 80-88.
22.
TapscottD.WilliamsA. (2007). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York, NY: Portfolio, Penguin Group.
23.
UganderJ.BackstromL.MarlowC.KleinbergJ. (2012). Structural diversity in social contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 5962-5966.
24.
University College Dublin Office of Research Ethics. (2015a). Ethics query.
WengL.FlamminiA.VespignaniA.MenczerF. (2012). Competition among memes in a world with limited attention. Scientific Reports, 2, Article 335.
27.
WengL.MenczerF.AhnY. Y. (2013). Virality prediction and community structure in social networks. Scientific Reports, 3, 2522.
28.
WilliamsM. T.ProettoD.CasianoD.FranklinM. E. (2012). Recruitment of a hidden population: African Americans with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 33, 67-75.
