Good Participatory Practice Guidelines for TB Drug Trials (GPP-TB) were issued in 2012, based on similar guidelines for HIV prevention and reflecting growing acceptance of the importance of community engagement and participatory strategies in clinical research. Though the need for such strategies is clear, evaluation of the benefits and burdens are needed. Working with a diverse group of global TB stakeholders including advocates, scientists, and ethicists, we used a Theory of Change approach to develop an evaluation framework for GPP-TB that includes a clearly defined ethical goal, a set of powerful strategies derived from GPP-TB practices for achieving the goal, and outcomes connecting strategies to goal. The framework is a first step in systematically evaluating participatory research in clinical trials.
AhmedS. M.PalermoA.-G. S. (2010). Community engagement in research: Frameworks for education and peer review. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1380-1387. doi:10.2105/ajph.2009.178137
2.
AndersonA. (2005). The community builder’s approach to theory of change: A practical guide to theory and development. New York, NY: Roundtable on Community Change, The Aspen Institute.
3.
BoulangerR. F.SeidelS.LessemE.Pyne-MercierL.WilliamsS. D.MingoteL. R.… LaveryJ. V. (2013). Engaging communities in tuberculosis research. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 13, 540-545. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70042-2
ConnellJ.KubischA.SchorrL.WeissC. (Eds.). (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
DunnC. E. (2007). Participatory GIS: A people’s GIS?Progress in Human Geography, 31, 616-637.
8.
EmanuelE. J.WendlerD.KillenJ.GradyC. (2004). What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical research. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 189, 930-937. doi:10.1086/381709
9.
HannahS.SeidelS.PatoS.OliffM. (2014, October28-31). Innovation in stakeholder engagement: Piloting a monitoring and evaluation toolkit. Poster presentation at HIV Research for Prevention, Cape Town, South Africa.
10.
JagoshJ.BushP. L.SalsbergJ.MacaulayA. C.GreenhalghT.WongG.PluyeP. (2015). A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: Partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects. BMC Public Health, 15, Article 725. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1
KingK. F.KolopackP.MerrittM. W.LaveryJ. V. (2014). Community engagement and the human infrastructure of global health research. BMC Medical Ethics, 15(1), Article 84. doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-84
13.
LaveryJ. V.TindanaP. O.ScottT. W.HarringtonL. C.RamseyJ. M.Ytuarte-NunezC.JamesA. A. (2010). Towards a framework for community engagement in global health research. Trends in Parasitology, 26, 279-283. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2010.02.009
14.
MackN.KirkendaleS.OmulloP.OdhiamboJ.RatlhaganaM.MasakiM.… CorneliA. (2013). Implementing good participatory practice guidelines in the FEM-PrEP Preexposure Prophylaxis trial for HIV Prevention among African women: A focus on local stakeholder involvement. Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials, 5, 127-135.
15.
MackN.RobinsonE. T.MacQueenK. M.JohnsonL. M. (2010). The exploitation of “exploitation” in the Tenofovir PrEP trial in Cameroon: Lessons learned from media coverage of an HIV prevention trial. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5, 3-19. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.2.3
16.
MacQueenK. M.BhanA.FrohlichJ.HolzerJ.SugarmanJ.the Ethics Working Group of the HIV Prevention Trials Network. (2015). Evaluating community engagement in global health research: The need for metrics. BMC Medical Ethics, 16, Article 44. doi:10.1186/s12910-015-0033-9
17.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (2001). Ethical and policy issues in international research: Clinical trials in developing countries. Volume I: Report and recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
NewmanP. A.RubincamC.SlackC.EssackZ.ChakrapaniV.ChuangD.-M… LindeggerG. (2015). Towards a science of community stakeholder engagement in biomedical HIV prevention trials: An embedded four-country case study. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0135937.
19.
ParkerB. (2006). Constructing community through maps? Power and praxis in community mapping. Professional Geographer, 58, 470-484.
20.
PawsonR. (2002). Evidence-based policy: The promise of “realist synthesis.”Evaluation, 8, 340-358.
21.
RamsayM.de VriesJ.SoodyallH.NorrisS. A.Sankoh, as members of the HAC. (2014). Ethical issues in genomic research on the African continent: Experiences and challenges to ethics review committees. Human Genomics, 8(1), Article 15. doi:10.1186/s40246-014-0015-x
22.
RossiP. H.LipseyM. W.FreemanH. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
23.
SagerF.AndereggenC. (2012). Dealing with complex causality in realist synthesis: The promise of qualitative comparative analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 33, 60-78.
24.
SchneiderC. Q.WagemannC. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
SinghJ. A.MillsE. J. (2005). The abandoned trials of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV: What went wrong?PLoS Medicine2(9), e234. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020234
26.
ThomasJ.O’Mara-EvesA.BruntonG. (2014). Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in systematic reviews of complex interventions: A worked example. Systematic Reviews, 3, Article 67. Retrieved from http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/content/3/1/67
27.
TindanaP. O.SinghJ. A.TracyC. S.UpshurR. E. G.DaarA. S.SingerP. A.… LaveryJ. V. (2007). Grand challenges in global health: Community engagement in research in developing countries. PLoS Medicine, 4(9), e273.
28.
WeissC. H. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In ConnellJ.KubischA.SchorrL.WeissC. (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 65-92). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
