This study explored participants’ experiences of randomized controlled trial (RCT) participation to examine their understanding of the trial design and whether their consent was indeed informed. A nested qualitative interview study was conducted with 38 participants from a sample of 282 who participated in a complex RCT evaluating the effectiveness of laser compared with needle acupuncture for chronic knee pain. Overall participants had a good understanding of the RCT, and concepts such as randomization and placebo. Their experiences of being in the trial were largely positive, even if they did not experience any knee pain improvement. Their responses to unblinding at the end of the study were accepting. Participants had a good functional understanding of the RCT, sufficient for valid informed consent.
AppelbaumP. S.LidzC. W.GrissoT. (2004). Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: Frequency and risk factors. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 26(2), 1-8.
2.
AppelbaumP. S.RothL. H.LidzC. (1982). The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 5, 319-329.
3.
BehrendtC.GölzT.RoeslerC.BertzH.WünschA. (2011). What do our patients understand about their trial participation? Assessing patients’ understanding of their informed consent consultation about randomised clinical trials. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37, 74-80.
4.
CassilethB. R.ZupkisR. V.Sutton-SmithK.MarchV. (1980). Informed consent—Why are its goals imperfectly realized?The New England Journal of Medicine, 302, 896-900.
5.
CherniackE. P. (2002). Informed consent for medical research by the elderly. Experimental Aging Research, 28, 183-198.
6.
CohnE.LarsonE. (2007). Improving participant comprehension in the informed consent process. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39, 273-280.
7.
CriscioneL. G.SugarmanJ.SandersL.PisetskyD. S.St ClairE. W. (2003). Informed consent in a clinical trial of a novel treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 49, 361-367.
8.
Dixon-WoodsM.TarrantC. (2009). Why do people cooperate with medical research? Findings from three studies. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 2215-2222.
9.
DonovanJ.BrindleL.MillsN. (2002). Capturing users’ experiences of participating in cancer trials. European Journal of Cancer Care, 11, 210-214.
10.
DunnL. B.JesteD. V. (2001). Enhancing informed consent for research and treatment. Neuropsychopharmacology, 24, 595-607.
11.
FeatherstoneK.DonovanJ. L. (1998). Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients’ perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 317, 1177-1180.
12.
FeatherstoneK.DonovanJ. L. (2002). “Why don’t they just tell me straight, why allocate it?” The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 709-719.
13.
HallowellN.CookeS.CrawfordG.LucassenA.ParkerM.SnowdonC. (2010). An investigation of patients’ motivations for their participation in genetics-related research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 36, 37-45.
14.
HendersonG. E.ChurchillL. R.DavisA. M.EasterM. M.GradyC.JoffeS.. . . MillerF. G. (2007). Clinical trials and medical care: Defining the therapeutic misconception. PLoS Medicine, 4(11), e324.
15.
HietanenP.AroA. R.HolliK.AbsetzP. (2000). Information and communication in the context of a clinical trial. European Journal of Cancer, 36, 2096-2104.
16.
HinmanR. S.McCroryP.PirottaM.RelfI.CrossleyK. M.ReddyP.. . . BennellK. L. (2012). Efficacy of acupuncture for chronic knee pain: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial using a Zelen design. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 12(1), 161.
17.
HinmanR. S.McCroryP.PirottaM.RelfI.ForbesA.CrossleyK. M.. . . BennellK. L. (2014). Acupuncture for chronic knee pain: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312, 1313-1322.
18.
JoffeS.CookE. F.ClearyP. D.ClarkJ. W.WeeksJ. C. (2001). Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: A cross-sectional survey. The Lancet, 358, 1772-1777.
19.
LidzC. W.AppelbaumP. S. (2002). The therapeutic misconception: Problems and solutions. Medical Care, 40, V55-V63.
20.
LidzC. W.AppelbaumP. S.GrissoT.RenaudM. (2004). Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials. Social Science & Medicine, 58, 1689-1697.
21.
LowtonK. (2005). Trials and tribulations: Understanding motivations for clinical research participation amongst adults with cystic fibrosis. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1854-1865.
22.
ManafaO.LindeggerG.IjsselmuidenC. (2007). Informed consent in an antiretroviral trial in Nigeria. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 4, 26-30.
23.
MillerF. G.JoffeS. (2006). Evaluating the therapeutic misconception. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 16, 353-366.
24.
Munalula-NkanduE.NdebeleP.SiziyaS.MunthaliJ. (2014). To what did they consent? Understanding consent among low literacy participants in a microbicide feasibility study in Mazabuka, Zambia. Developing World Bioethics. doi:10.1111/dewb.12069
25.
NdebeleP.WassenaarD.MasiyeF.Munalula-NkanduE. (2014). Trial participants’ understanding of randomization, double-blinding, and placebo use in low literacy populations: Findings from a study conducted within a microbicide trial in Malawi. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 9(3), 2-10.
26.
RavinaB.SwearingenC.ElmJ.KampC.KieburtzK.KimS. Y. (2010). Long term understanding of study information in research participants with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, 16(1), 60-63.
27.
RobersonN. L. (1994). Clinical trial participation: Viewpoints from racial/ethnic groups. Cancer, 74(Suppl.), 2687-2691.
28.
RobinsonE. J.KerrC.StevensA.LilfordR.BraunholtzD.EdwardsS.. . . RowleyM. (2005). Lay public’s understanding of equipoise and randomisation in randomised controlled trials. Health Technology Assessment, 9, 1-192.
29.
SnowdonC.GarciaJ.ElbourneD. (1997). Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Social Science & Medicine, 45, 1337-1355.
30.
SteadM.EadieD.GordonD.AngusK. (2005). “Hello, hello—It’s English I speak!” A qualitative exploration of patients’ understanding of the science of clinical trials. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31, 664-669.
31.
SugarmanJ.McCroryD. C.PowellD.KrasnyA.AdamsB.BallE.CassellC. (1999). Empirical research on informed consent: An annotated bibliography. Hastings Center Report, 29(1), s1-s42.
32.
SwiftT. L. (2012). Sham surgery trial controls: Perspectives of patients and their relatives. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(3), 15-28.
33.
WillisK. F.RobinsonA.Wood-BakerR.TurnerP.WaltersE. H. (2011). Participating in research exploring participation and engagement in a study of self-management for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Qualitative Health Research, 21, 1273-1282.
