Principals play a critical role in creating safe, inclusive, and equitable schools. Unfortunately, many schools maintain a legacy of exclusionary discipline and racial bias. In such contexts, principals can work collaboratively with school personnel and community members to interrogate existing policies, practices, and outcomes to inform subsequent school improvement efforts. In this case, a principal in an urban school district situated within a gentrifying school–community identifies her school’s legacy of racial bias and works to enact restorative justice. However, the principal confronts challenges and resistance during the implementation process.
BogotchI. E. (2002). Educational leadership and social justice: Practice into theory. Journal of School Leadership, 12(2), 138–156.
4.
Children’s Defense Fund. (1975). School suspensions: Are they helping children?Washington Research Project.
5.
FenningP.RoseJ. (2007). Overrepresentation of African American students in exclusionary discipline the role of school policy. Urban Education, 42, 536–559.
6.
DeMatthewsD. E.MawhinneyH. (2014). Social justice leadership and inclusion: Exploring challenges in an urban district struggling to address inequities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(5), 844–881.
7.
DeMatthewsD. E.CareyR. L.OlivarezA.Moussavi SaeediK. (2017). Guilty as charged? Principals’ perspectives on disciplinary practices and the racial discipline gap. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(4), 519–555.
8.
GregoryA.WeinsteinR. S. (2008). The discipline gap and African Americans: Defiance or cooperation in the high school classroom. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 455–475.
9.
HashimA.StrunkK.DhaliwalT. (2018). Justice for all? suspension bans and restorative justice programs in the Los Angeles unified school district. Peabody Journal of Education, 93(2), 174–189.
10.
HittD. H.TuckerP. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement: A unified framework. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569.
IrbyD. J. (2014). Trouble at school: Understanding school discipline systems as nets of social control. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47, 513–530.
13.
IrbyD. J. (2018). Mo’data, mo’problems: Making sense of racial discipline disparities in a large diversifying suburban high school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(5), 693–722.
14.
KupchikA. (2009). Things are tough all over: Race, ethnicity, class and school discipline. Punishment & Society, 11, 291–317.
15.
LeithwoodK.HarrisA.HopkinsD. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28, 27–42.
16.
LustickH. (2017). “Restorative justice” or restoring order? Restorative school discipline practices in urban public schools. Urban Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917741725
17.
MansfieldK. C.FowlerB.RainboltS. (2018). The potential of restorative practices to ameliorate discipline gaps: The story of one high school’s leadership team. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(2), 303–323.
18.
McKenzieK. B.ChristmanD. E.HernandezF.FierroE.CapperC. A.DantleyM.GonzalezM.Cambron-McCabeN.ScheurichJ. J. (2008). From the field: A proposal for educating leaders for social justice. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(1), 111–138.
19.
National Policy Board for Educational Administration. (2015). Professional standards for educational leaders 2015.
20.
RobinsonV. M.LloydC. A.RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635–674.
21.
TheoharisG. (2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(2), 221–258.
22.
WadhwaA. (2015). Restorative justice in urban schools: Disrupting the school-to-prison pipeline. Routledge.
