“Why are the Gifted Classes So White?” Making Space for Gifted Latino Students

Abstract

Bryson Valley Elementary School’s population is changing, formerly consisting of students, 72% of whom identified as White, but now only 53% of students do so; 26% of its 800 students identify as Latinx,¹ the largest minority group in the school. The school’s new Academically and/or Intellectually Gifted (AIG) teacher, Judith Hunter, notices a disparity in ethnic representation in the AIG program and hopes to change that situation. Two challenges that Judith faces are resistance from teachers who tend to hold deficit orientations toward some groups of students, as well as a fairly apathetic principal who is nearing retirement. When viewed through the lens of Critical Race Theory, the implicit racism in the school’s gifted identification procedures becomes more obvious.

Keywords

gifted education ethnic bias Critical Race Theory equity Latinx students

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bishofberger

S. D.

(2012). Elementary teachers’ perceptions of giftedness: An examination of the relationship between teacher background and gifted identification. (Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Tennessee). Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1270/

Borland

J. H.

(2003). The death of giftedness: Gifted education without gifted children. In Borland

J. H.

(Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 105-126). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Borland

J. H.

(2005). Gifted education without gifted children: The case for no conception of giftedness. In Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 1-19). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Bracamonte

(2010, March). Twice-exceptional students: Who are they and what do they need? 2e: Twice-Exceptional Newsletter. Retrieved from http://www.2enewsletter.com/article_2e_what_are_they.html#top

Callahan

C. M.

(2005). Identifying gifted students from underrepresented populations. Theory into Practice, 44(2), 98-104.

Capper

C. A.

Young

M. D.

(2015). The equity audit as the core of leading increasingly diverse schools and districts. In Scanlan

M. K.

Theoharis

(Eds.), Leadership for increasingly diverse schools (pp. 186-197). New York, NY: Routledge.

Castellano

(1998). ERIC ED423104: Identifying and assessing gifted and talented bilingual Hispanic students. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/ERIC_ED423104

Crenshaw

(1988). Race, reform, and retrenchment: Transformation and legitimation in antidiscrimination law. Harvard Law Review, 101(7), 1331-1387. doi:10.2307/1341398

Cunningham

C. M.

Callahan

C. M.

Plucker

J. A.

Roberson

S. C.

Rapkin

(1998). Identifying Hispanic students of outstanding talent: Psychometric integrity of a peer nomination form. Exceptional Children, 64(2), 197-209.

10.

DeCuir

J. T.

Dixson

A. D.

(2004). “So when it comes out, they aren’t that surprised that it is there”: Using Critical Race Theory as a tool of analysis of race and racism in education. Educational Researcher, 33(5), 26-31.

11.

Delgado

Stefancic

(1993). Critical Race Theory: An annotated bibliography. Virginia Law Review, 79(2), 461-516. doi:10.2307/1073418

12.

Delgado

Stefancic

(2001). Critical Race Theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.

13.

Erwin

J. O.

Worrell

F. C.

(2012). Assessment practices and the underrepresentation of minority students in gifted and talented education. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 74-87.

14.

Ferguson

R. F.

(2016). Aiming higher together: Strategizing better educational outcomes for boys and young men of color. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/research/publication/aiming-higher-together-strategizing-better-educational-outcomes-boys-and-young-men-color

15.

Ford

D. Y.

(1995). Desegregating gifted education: A need unmet. Journal of Negro Education, 64, 52-62.

16.

Ford

D. Y.

(1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students: Promising practices and programs. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

17.

Ford

D. Y.

(1998). The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. The Journal of Special Education, 32(1), 4-14.

18.

Fultz

Lara-Alecio

Irby

B. J.

Tong

(2013). The Hispanic bilingual screening instrument: A validation study. National Forum of Multicultural Issues Journal, 10(1), 1-26.

19.

Harris

C. I.

(1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106, 1707-1791.

20.

Hines-Datiri

(2015). When police intervene: Race, gender, and discipline of Black male students at an urban high school. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 18(2), 122-133.

21.

Hodge

K. A.

Kemp

C. R.

(2006). Recognition of giftedness in the early years of school: Perspectives of teachers, parents, and children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 164-204.

22.

Irby

B. J.

Lara-Alecio

Milke

(1999, January). Assessment from multiple perspectives for second language learners: An analysis of the Hispanic Bilingual Gifted Screening Instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Bilingual Education, Denver, CO.

23.

Jenkins

M. D.

(1936). A socio-psychological study of Negro children of superior intelligence. Journal of Negro Education, 5(2), 175-190.

24.

Kıncal

R. Y.

Abacı

Çetinkaya

Ç.

Uşak

İnci

(2013). Unusual topics in preschool gifted and talented children. International Journal of Educational Science, 5, 179-186.

25.

Kaplan

R. M.

Saccuzzo

D. P.

(2018). Psychological testing: Principles, applications, and issues (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

26.

Karpinski

C. F.

(2006). And the band played on? Social justice and the Wilson middle school arts program. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 9(4), 41-52.

27.

Kaya

(2013). The role of peer nomination forms in the identification of lower elementary gifted and talented students. Educational Research and Reviews, 8(24), 2260-2269.

28.

Kıncal

R.Y.

Abacı

Çetinkaya

Ç.

Uşak

İnci

(2013). Unusual topics in preschool gifted and talented children. International Journal of Educational Science, 5(3), 179-186.

29.

Ladson-Billings

Tate

W. F.

IV . (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47-68.

30.

Lohman

D. F.

(2006). Beliefs about differences between ability and accomplishment: From folk theories to cognitive science. Roeper Review, 29(1), 32-40.

31.

Maas

(2016). Who gets into gifted and talented education programs? Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/digest/nov15/w21519.html

32.

Mansfield

K. C.

(2015). Giftedness as property: Troubling whiteness, wealth, and gifted education in the United States. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 17(1), 143-161.

33.

Mansfield

K. C.

(2016). The color of giftedness: A policy genealogy implicating educators past, present, and future. Educational Studies, 52(4), 289-312.

34.

Marland

S. P.

Jr. (1971). Education of the gifted and talented-Volume 1: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

35.

Mcclain

M. C.

Pfeiffer

(2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: A look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(1), 59-88.

36.

Michael-Chadwell

(2011). Examining the underrepresentation of underserved students in gifted programs from a transformational leadership vantage point. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 99-130.

37.

Miller

E. M.

(2009). The effect of training in gifted education on elementary classroom teachers’ theory-based reasoning about the concept of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(1), 65-105,145.

38.

Milner

H. R.

Ford

D. Y.

(2007). Cultural considerations in the underrepresentation of culturally diverse elementary students in gifted education. Roeper Review, 29(3), 166-173.

39.

Monaghan

(1993, June). “Critical Race Theory” questions role of legal doctrine in racial inequity. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 39(42), A7, A9.

40.

Moon

T. R.

Brighton

C. M.

(2008). Primary teachers’ conceptions of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31(4), 447-480.

41.

National Association for Gifted Children. (2017). National standards in gifted and talented education. Retrieved from https://www.nagc.org/resources-publications/resources/national-standards-gifted-and-talented-education

42.

Olenchak

F. R.

(2006). Reliability and validity are important! In Slocumb

P. D.

Olenchak

F. R.

Equity in gifted education: A state initiative (pp. 49-69). Austin: Texas Education Agency.

43.

Özcan

Kaya

(2016). What does giftedness mean according to teachers? International Journal of Learning & Teaching, 8(2), 150-155.

44.

Pfeiffer

S. I.

(2002). Identifying gifted and talented students: Recurring issues and promising solutions. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(1), 31-50.

45.

Pigott

R. L.

Cowen

E. L.

(2000). Teacher race, child race, racial congruence, and teacher ratings of children’s school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 38(2), 177-195.

46.

Pollack

T. M.

(2012). Unpacking everyday “teacher talk” about students and families of color: Implications for teacher and school leader development. Urban Education, 48(6), 863-894.

47.

Ramos

(2010). Let us in: Latino underrepresentation in gifted and talented programs. Journal of Cultural Diversity, 17(4), 151-154.

48.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(3), 150-159.

49.

Roda

(2015). Inequality in gifted and talented programs: Parental choices about status, school opportunity, and second-generation segregation. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.

50.

Rodriguez

M. A.

(2012). “But they just can’t do it”: Reconciling teacher expectations of Latino students. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 15(1), 25-31.

51.

Rohrer

J. C.

(1995). Primary teacher conceptions of giftedness: Image, evidence, and nonevidence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18(3), 269-283.

52.

Ryser

G. R.

(2005). Placement information data: Unraveling the mystery. Tempo, 3(25), 7-11.

53.

Scanlan

(2016). The changing colors of Maple Hills: Intersections of culture, race, language, and exceptionality in a rural farming community. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 19(1), 62-69.

54.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2007). Foreword: Why a cultural approach to giftedness? In Phillipson

S. N.

McCann

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. xv-xviii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

55.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2009). Wisdom, intelligence, creativity, synthesized: A model of giftedness. In Balchin

Humer

B. J.

Matthews

D. J.

(Eds.), The Routledge-Falmer international companion to gifted education (pp. 255-264). London, England: Routledge-Falmer.

56.

Szymanski

Shaff

(2013). Teacher perspectives regarding gifted diverse students. Gifted Children, 6(1), Article1.

57.

Tenenbaum

H. R.

Ruck

M. D.

(2007). Are teachers’ expectations different for racial minority than for European American students? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 253-273.

58.

Torrance

E. P.

(1984). The role of creativity in identification of the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(4), 153-156.

59.

U.S. Department of Education. (1993a). Jacob K. Javits gifted and talented students education program. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/javits/legislation.html

60.

U.S. Department of Education. (1993b). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED359743.pdf

61.

U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2016). 2013-2014 Civil rights data collection: A first look. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

62.

U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Types of educational opportunities discrimination. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/crt/types-educational-opportunities-discrimination

63.

Valdés

(2003). Expanding definitions of giftedness: The case of young interpreters from immigrant communities. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

64.

Valencia

R. R.

(2010). Dismantling contemporary deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

65.

Valencia

R. R.

Suzuki

L. A.

(2001). Intelligence testing and minority students: Foundations, performance factors, and assessment issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

66.

Van Tassell-Baska

. (1986). The use of aptitude tests for identifying the gifted: The talent search concept. Roeper Review, 8(3), 185-189.

67.

Vaught

S. E.

Castagno

A. E.

(2008). “I don’t think I’m a racist”: Critical Race Theory, teacher attitudes, and structural racism. Race Ethnicity and Education, 11, 95-113.

68.

Wake County, North Carolina. (2013). Board of commissioners retreat (2-15-2013): Growth trends. http://www.wakegov.com/planning/demographic/Documents/trends4172013.pdf

69.

Walston

S. R.

(2016). Census, demographics and population data. Retrieved from http://www.wakegov.com/planning/demographic/Pages/default.aspx#demographics

70.

Worrell

F. C.

Erwin

J. O.

(2011). Best practices in identifying students for gifted and talented education programs. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27(4), 319-340.