Gender discrimination and sexual harassment persist on college campuses across the United States. This seems especially obvious at the beginning of the academic year when many freshman women and their parents are welcomed to campus with sexually explicit signs displayed on all-male residences. But, sometimes, sexual harassment and gender discrimination takes a subtler form, creating unique challenges for administrators. This article presents the true case of a professional fraternity party gone awry, testing the leadership skills of several college administrators. The case provides a platform for educational leadership students to apply the theories they are learning in their preparation programs to real-life situations. This case is important and timely as educational leaders across the p-20 pipeline struggle to navigate the U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights’ 2011 directives concerning defining and responding to allegations of sexual assault and harassment.
ASHE Higher Education Report. (2012). Nudging minds to life: Self-authorship as a foundation for learningASHE Higher Education Report, 38, 1-19.
4.
BenokraitisN. V.FeaginJ. R. (1995). Modern sexism: Blatant, subtle, and covert discrimination. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
BistaK.FosterC. (Eds.). (2016). Campus support services, programs, and policies for international students. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9752-2
6.
DeckerA. (2013). Student centered practice in the 21st century community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 37, 561-565.
KaufmanR. (2008, Summer). A practical definition of ethics for truly strategic planning in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 2008, 9-15.
12.
KeganR. (1994). In our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
KingP. M.Baxter MagoldaM. B. (2011). Student learning in student services: A handbook for the profession. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
KnefelkampL. L. (2003). The influence of a classic. Liberal Education, 89, 10-15.
17.
KossM. P.GainesJ. A. (1993). The prediction of sexual aggression by alcohol use, athletic participation, and fraternity affiliation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 94-108.
18.
KoterskiJ. (2002). Lecture transcript and course guidebook: Natural law and human nature. Chantilly, VA: The Teaching Company.
19.
KuhG. D.JelkeT. (2003). High performing fraternities and sororities. In GregoryD. E. (Ed.), The administration of fraternal organizations on North American Campuses (pp. 280-291). Asheville, NC: College Administration Publications.
20.
LoveP. G.GuthrieV. L. (1999). Perry’s intellectual scheme. New Directions for Student Services, 88, 5-15.
21.
McCleskyJ. A. (2014). Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5, 117-130.
MinowJ. C.EinolfC. J. (2009). Sorority participation and sexual assault risk. Against Women, 15, 835-851.
24.
MurnenS. K.KohlmanM. H. (2007). Athletic participation, fraternity membership, and sexual aggression among college men: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 57, 145-157.
TreviñoL. K.HartmanL. P.BrownM. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42, 128-142.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
