This case focuses on the potential problems associated with sharing personally identifiable information (PII) when students are required to use third-party software. Specifically, third-grade students were required to complete LearningPad1 activities as a component of their homework grade in math, spelling, and language arts. As students completed activities, their class rank, total number of correct responses, and total time on task were displayed for all students in the class to see. The administration had to make a decision as to whether the use of LearningPad software and the displaying of student data were violations of student privacy laws.
BriggsB. S.SassC. (2016). Websites and mobile applications: Do they comply with Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act?The Florida Bar Journal, 90(8), 40-45.
HeldV. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
6.
Hillwood city schools finds success with LearningPad and extends license district-wide. (2015). [Press Release].
7.
MathurS.CorleyK. (2014). Bringing ethics into the classroom: Making a case for frameworks, multiple perspectives and narrative sharing. International Education Studies, 7(9), 136-147.
8.
McCarthyM. M.Cambron-McCabeN. H.ThomasS. B. (2004). Legal rights of teachers and students (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
9.
Owasso Public Schools v. Falvo, 534 U.S. 426 (2002).
RiceK. (2014). Research and history of policies in K-12 online and blended learning. In FerdigR.KennedyK. (Eds.), Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (pp. 51-81). Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Entertainment Technology Center Press.
12.
ShapiroJ. P.StefkovichJ. A. (2001). Ethical leadership and decision making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13.
SullivanW. (1986). Reconstructing public philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
