In this case, a new superintendent has communicated what he perceives as a needed change affecting students and teachers on several campuses and a seemingly short timeline for making the decision to move off a block schedule. The abrupt nature of the announcement, combined with the circumstances surrounding the superintendent’s recent hiring has teachers and building level administrators wondering about his motives.
BazarovaN. N.HancockJ. T. (2011). Attributions after a group failure: Do they matter? Effects of attributions on group communications and performances. Communication Research, 39, 499-522. doi:10.1177/0093650210397538
2.
BrykA. S.SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
3.
BurbulesN. C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
4.
CarterG. R.CunninghamW. G. (1997). The American school superintendent. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
ChunS. A.ChoJ. S. (2012). E-participation and transparent policy decision making. Information Policy, 17(2), 129-145. doi:10.3233/IP-2012-0273
6.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571. Available from http://www.jstor.org
7.
DahnkeG. L.ClatterbuckG. W. (Eds.). (1990). Human communication. Theory and practice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8.
DalyA. J. (2009). Rigid response in an age of accountability: The potential of leadership and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 168-216. doi:10.1177/0013161X08330499
9.
Fullan. (2003). Change forces: With a vengeance. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
10.
Guerra-LópezI.BlakeA. M. (2011). Leadership decision making and the use of data. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24(2), 89-104. doi:10.1002/piq.20113
11.
HansonE. M. (2003). Educational administration and organizational behavior (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
HoyW. K.MiskelC. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
13.
KeytonJ.CaputoJ. M.FordE. A.FuR.LeibowitzS. A.LiuT. . . . WuC. (2013). Investigating verbal workplace communication behaviors. Journal of Business Communication, 50, 152-169. doi:10.1177/0021943612474990
14.
KirkpatrickS. A.LockeE. A. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter?Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 48-60.
15.
LunenbergF. C.OrnsteinA. C. (2011). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.
16.
SchmuckR. A.RunkelP. J. (1985). The handbook of organizational development in schools (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Co.
17.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
18.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly, 45, 217-247. doi:10.1177/0013161X08330501
19.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyW. K. (2000). A multidisciplinary analysis of the nature, meaning and measurement of trust. Review of Educational Research, 70, 547-593. doi:10.3102/00346543070004547
20.
ChunS. A.ChoJ. S. (2012). E-participation and transparent policy decision making. Information Policy, 17(2), 129-145. doi:10.3233/IP-2012-0273
21.
DaftR. L.LengelR. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571. Available from http://www.jstor.org/
22.
DalyA. J.ChrispeelsJ. (2008). A question of trust: Predictive conditions for adaptive and technical leadership in educational contexts. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 7, 30-63. doi:10.1080/15700760701655508
23.
DukeD. L. (2004). The challenges of educational change. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
EllerJ.CarlsonH. C. (2009). So now you’re the superintendent!Thousand Oaks, CA. SAGE.
25.
Guerra-LópezI.BlakeA. M. (2011). Leadership decision making and the use of data. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 24(2), 89-104. doi:10.1002/piq.20113
26.
HoyW. K.TarterC. J. (2006). School mindfulness and faculty trust: Necessary conditions for each other?Educational Administration Quarterly, 42, 236-255. doi:10.1177/0013161X04273844
27.
LouisK. S. (2007). Trust and improvement on schools. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 1-24. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-9015-5
28.
NortonM. S. (2005). Executive leadership for effective administration. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
29.
NortonM. S.WebbL. D.DlugoshL. L.SyboutsW. (1996). The school superintendency: New responsibilities, new leadership. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
SharpW. L.WalterJ. K. (2004). The school superintendent: The profession and the person. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
31.
Tschannen-MoranM. (2004). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
32.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyW. K. (1998). Trust in schools: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 36, 334-352. doi:10.1108/09578239810211518
