The fervor of student speech is demonstrated through different mediums and venues in public schools. In this case, a new principal encounters the mores of a community that believes in free speech, specifically student free speech. When a pep rally becomes a venue for hate speech, terroristic threats, and profanity, the student code of conduct could become the principal’s best weapon. This case explores case law, codes of conduct, organizational culture and climate, and leadership in the context of a controversial cheerleader sketch at a pep rally. A brief literature review can be found in the teaching notes with suggestions for current and future school administrators.
AlexanderK.AlexanderM. (2009). American public school law (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cenage Learning.
2.
BartonD. (2008). Original intent: The courts, the constitution, and religion. Aledo, TX: WallBuilders Press.
3.
Bethel School District v. Fraser, 478 U.S. 675 (1986).
4.
BosherW.KaminskiK.VaccaR. (2004). The school law handbook: What every leader needs to know. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5.
GortonR.AlstonJ. (2009). School leadership and administration: Important concepts, case studies, and simulations (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
6.
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988).
7.
KingM. (1999). Partners in progress: Strengthening the superintendent-board relationship. New directions of school leadership. Cambridge, MA: Jossey-Bass.
8.
KowalskiT. (2008). Case studies on educational administration (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
9.
OwensR.ValeskyT. (2011). Organizational behavior in education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
10.
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969).
11.
WalshJ.KemererF.ManiotisL. (2010). The educator’s guide to Texas school law (7th ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
