Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This case study focuses on issues of freedom of speech and freedom of religion in public schools. It involves a rural, southern high school where a group of students participated in a Day of Silence. The school allowed the students to participate based on the principal’s understanding of the students’ First Amendment rights. However, the next day, the principal prohibited a student from participating in a Day of Truth. She believed that student participation in a Day of Truth could be viewed as the school’s endorsement of religion and violates the doctrine of separation of church and state. The principal’s decision had far reaching consequences in this religiously conservative community, including a lawsuit against the school district. This case study provides an opportunity for both practicing and aspiring school leaders to explore a number of administrative, legal, and ethical dilemmas utilizing a framework grounded in the principles of social justice, equity, and diversity. Students can reflect on and engage with both legal and social justice issues through reading and discussing this case. Hopefully, this case study will lead to a discussion of queer issues using an authentic school story.

Keywords

First Amendment queer queer theory social justice school public relations

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alliance Defense Fund. (2008). Retrieved from http://www.dayofdialogue.com/2011/01/11/7-day-of-dialogue-guiding-principles/

Butler

(1990).Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.

Doll

M. A.

(1998). Queering the gaze. In Pinar

(Ed.), Queer theory in education (pp. 287-298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Eaton

L. E.

(2005). Constructing rainbow classrooms: Non-heterosexual students’ journey toward safer schools. Doctoral dissertation. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

Evans

(2000). Creating a positive learning environment for gay, lesbian, and bisexual students. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 82, 81-87.

Good News Club v. Milford, 533 U.S. 98, 106-07 (2001)

Klages

(1997). Queer theory. Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/English/courses/ENGL2012Klages/queertheory.html

Kosciw

J. G.

(2004). The 2003 national school climate survey: The school-related experiences of our nation’s lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. New York, NY: Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network.

Kosciw

J. G.

Cullen

M. K.

(2002). The GLSEN 2001 national school climate survey: The school-related experiences of our nation’s lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth. New York, NY: Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network.

10.

LeCompte

(2000). Standing for just and right decisions: The long, slow path to school safety. Education and Urban Society, 32, 413-429.

11.

Morris

(1998). Unresting the curriculum: Queer projects, queer imaginings. In Pinar

(Ed.), Queer theory in education (pp. 275-287). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

12.

Morris

(2000). Dante’s left foot kicks queer theory into gear. In Steinberg

S. T. S.

(Ed.), Thinking queer: Sexuality, culture and education (pp. 15-32). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

13.

National School Climate Survey. (2005). Retrieved from http://www.dayofsilence.org/content/news.html

14.

Pinar

(1998a). Queer theory in education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

15.

Pinar

(1998b). Understanding curriculum as gender text: Notes on reproduction, resistance, and male-male relations. In Pinar

(Ed.), Queer theory in education (pp. 221-244). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

16.

Pinar

(2000). Foreword. In Talburt

Steinberg

(Eds.), Thinking queer: Sexuality, culture, and education (pp. ix-xvii). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

17.

Pope by Pope v. East Brunswick Board of Education, 12 F.3d 1244, 1251 (3d Cir. 1993).

18.

Quinlivan

Town

(1999). Queer pedagogy, educational practice and lesbian and gay youth. Qualitative Studies in Education, 12, 509-524.

19.

Rodriguez

(1998). (Queer) youth as political and pedagogical. In Pinar

(Ed.), Queer theory in education (pp. 173-186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

20.

Schneider

Owens

(2000). Concerns for lesbian, gay, and bisexual kids: The benefits of all children. Education and Urban Society, 32, 349-367.

21.

Steinberg

(2000). From the closet to the corral: Neo-stereotyping in In & Out. In Talburt

Steinberg

(Eds.), Thinking queer: Sexuality, culture, and education (pp. 153-160). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

22.

Talburt

(2000). Identity politics, institutional response, and cultural negotiation: Meanings of a gay and lesbian office on campus. In Talburt

Steinberg

(Eds.), Thinking queer: Sexuality, culture, and education (pp. 61-84). New York, NY: Peter Lang.

23.

Theory.org.uk. (2008). Judith Butler. Retrieved from http://www.theory.org.uk/ctr-butl.htm

24.

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969)

25.

Tschannen-Moran

(2004). Trust matters. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

26.

Uribe

(1994). The silent minority: Rethinking our commitment to gay and lesbian youth. Theory Into Practice, 33, 167-172.

A Day of Silence,a Day of Truth,and a Lawsuit

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References