Immersed in host countries around the globe, American international schools serve about a quarter of a million Americans. These schools can often be perceived as representatives of U.S. schools in the international setting. This study has a twofold purpose: to introduce students to the philosophy, policies, and practices of American schools overseas and to provide ethical considerations in the diffusion and implementation of policies that influence teaching and learning practices.
Bennett, M.J. (1986). Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In M. Paige (Ed.), Cross cultural orientation (pp. 27-69). Blue Ridge Summit: University Press of America.
2.
Bentz, C.L. (1972). The chief school administrator in selected overseas American-sponsored schools: A study in crisis management. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.
3.
Blanford, S., & Shaw, M. (2001). Managing international schools. New York: Routledge Falmer.
4.
Daley, J.M., & Wong, P. (1994). Community development with emerging ethnic communities . Journal of Community Practice, 1, 9-24.
5.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1990). Instructional policy into practice: The power of the bottom over the top. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 339-347.
6.
Elmore, R. (1983). Complexity and control: What legislators and administrators can do about implementing policy. In L. S. Shulman and G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 342-369). New York: Longman.
7.
Flora, R.W. (1972). An investigation of innovative practices in American overseas schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo, OH.
8.
Gonzales, A.C. (1987). A profile of women administrators in American-sponsored overseas schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alabama.
9.
Green, T. (1983). Excellence, equity, and equality. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 318-341). New York: Longman.
10.
Hayden, M., & Thompson, J. (2000). International schools and international education: Improving teaching, management, and quality. Great Britain: Clays Ltd.
11.
Hayden, M.C., & Thompson, J.J. (1996). Potential difference: The driving force for international education. International Schools Journal, 16, 46-57.
12.
Heck, R.H., & Hallinger, P. (1999). Next generation methods for the study of leadership and school improvement. In J. Murphy & K. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 141-162). San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
13.
Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
International Baccalaureate Organization. (2004). Available at http://www.ibo.org.
15.
Leithwood, K., & Duke, D. (1999). A century's quest to understand school leadership . In J. Murphy & K. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
Matthews, M. (1989). The uniqueness of international education part II. TheInternational Schools Journal, 18(Spring), 22-34.
17.
McKenzie, M. (1998). Going, going, gone. . . global. In M. Hayden & J. Thompson (Eds.), International education: Principles and practice (pp. 242-252). London: Kogan Page Limited.
18.
Sarason, S. (1982). The cultures of the school and the problem of change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
19.
Spring, J. (2004). How educational ideologies are shaping global society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
20.
Stein, S.J. (2004). The culture of education policy. New York: Teachers College Press.
21.
U.S. Department of State. (2003). American-sponsored elementary and secondary schools overseas (Overseas Schools Advisory Council Worldwide Fact Sheet—2003—2004). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
22.
Weiss, C. (1995). The four I's of school reform: How interests, ideology, information and institution affect teachers and principals. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 571-592.
