Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This case was developed for use in principalship preparation courses. It focuses on the ethical and procedural dilemmas inherent in trying to support a teacher who might be wrong in a conflict situation with a student and parents. Background is provided and the situation developed to the point where the principal sees the need to take action. At five points in the case, there is a break to allow students to analyze the situation and propose next steps. Students must consider what would be a fair and ethical outcome in this situation and how, ethically, to bring it about. Alternative escalating and deescalating endings are provided. Each leaves the students with questions about how best to help the teacher and her students.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adam’s equity theory. (n.d.). Retrieved October 13, 2003, from http://www.businessballs.com/adamsequitytheory.htm

Bolman, L. G. , & Deal, T. E. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Fisher, R. , Ury, W. , & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in (2nd ed.). New York: Penguin Books.

Glickman, C. D. , Gordon, S. P. , & Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2001). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach, 5th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Hoy, W. K. , & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice, 6th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Huseman. R. C. , & Hatfield, J. D. (1990, April). Equity theory and the managerial matrix. Training & Development Journal, pp. 98-102.

Maurer, R. E. (1991). Managing conflict: Tactics for school administrators. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

McEwan, E. K. (1998, April). How to deal with parents who are angry, troubled, afraid, or just plan crazy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED422639)

10.

Quick, T. L. (1988, July). Expectancy theory in five simple steps. Training and Development Journal,pp. 30-32.

11.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2001). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective, 4th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

12.

Scholl, R. W. (n.d.). Expectancy theory. Retrieved October 13, 2003, from http://www.cba.uri.edu/Scholl/Notes/Motivation_Expectancy.html

13.

Scholl, R. W. (n.d.). Primer on equity. Retrieved October 13, 2003, from http://www.cba.uri.edu/Scholl/Notes/Equity.html

14.

Snowden, P. E. , & Gorton, R. A. (2002). School leadership and administration: Important concepts, case studies, and simulations, 6th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

15.

Stone, D. , Patton, B. , & Heen, S. (1999). Difficult conversations: How to discuss what matters most. New York: Penguin Books.

What Is a Principal to Do?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References