Computer-based multimedia technologies have great potential for providing rich learning opportunities for school leaders in the context of their work. One promising avenue is the development of hypertext narratives of practice that can capture and communicate the complexities of exemplary leadership practice. This paper discusses the construction and user-testing of a multimedia narrative of practice based on Breakfast Club, an innovative program intended to develop a professional community in an urban elementary school. First, the paper develops an account of professional expertise that suggests the practical wisdom of school leaders needs to be represented in context. Multimedia cases of practice that represent such wisdom begin with the programs school leaders design to alter the instructional programs of their schools. Second, the paper describes the development of a question-based multimedia case of practice designed around the questions that school leaders are likely to ask about new programs in order to facilitate their own understanding. Finally, the paper offers an analysis of a round of user-testing with fourteen school leaders conducted to refine and rebuild the multimedia narrative.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, B.
(1993). “Inventing new systems: The stages of systemic change.”Educational Leadership, (51)1.
2.
Argyris, C.
& Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
3.
Aristotle
. (1941). Nicomachean ethics, in The Basic Works of Aristotle, by Richard McKeon, Random House.
4.
Banks, M.
(1994). “Interactive multimedia and anthropology - a sceptical view.”Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, 1-7.
5.
Barron, L.
& Goldman, E. (1994). "Integrating technology with teacher preparation", in B. Means ed., Technology and Education Reform: The Reality Behind the Promise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 67-89.
6.
Bourdieu, P.
(1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
7.
Bransford, J.
, Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
8.
Bridges, E.M.
& Hallinger, P. (1995) Implementing problem-based learning in leadership development. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon.
9.
Bruner, J. S.
(1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Bryk, A.
& Schneider, B. (2002) Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
11.
Cole, M.
, & Scribner, S. (1974). Culture and thought - A psychological introduction. New York: Willey.
12.
Corey E. R.
(1976). Uses of cases in management education. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
13.
Danielson, C.
, & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum.
14.
Dunne. J.
(1993) Back to the rough ground: 'Phronesis' and `Techne' in modern philosophy and in Aristotle. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
15.
Elmore, R.
(2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education. Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
16.
Feiman-Nemser, S.
, Parker, M. B., & Zeichner, K. (1990). “Are mentor teachers teacher educators?” Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
17.
Ferguson, W.
, Bareiss, R., Birnbaum, L., & Osgood, R. (1992). “ASK systems: An approach to the realization of story-based teachers.”The Journal of the Learning Sciences.1(2), 95-134.
18.
Fitzgerald, G.
, Deasy, G., & Semrau, L. (1997). “Interactive multimedia training materials for assessment of students with behavioral problems: Design and outcomes.”Journal of Technology and Teacher Education. 5(2/3).
19.
Flagg, B. N.
(1990). Formative evaluation for educational technologies. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20.
Fogg, B.J.
& Tseng, H. (1999). The elements of computer credibility. Paper presented at the 1999 Computer Human Interaction Conference Annual Meeting, New York.
21.
Frederiksen, J. R.
, Sipusic, M., Sherin, M., & Wolfe, E.W. (1998). “Video portfolio assessment: Creating a framework for viewing the functions of teaching.”Educational Assessment, 5(4).
22.
Halverson, R.
(2002). Representing phronesis: Supporting instructional leadership practice in schools. ProQuest Digital Dissertations available at http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/3050529.
23.
Halverson, R.
, (2003, October 10). “Systems of practice: How leaders use artifacts to create professional community in schools.”Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(37). Retrieved October 21, 2003 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n37/.
24.
Halverson, R.
& Gomez, L. (2001). "Phronesis and design: How practical wisdom is disclosed through collaborative design." Paper presented at the 2001 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
25.
Halverson, R.
& Zoltners, J. (2001). "Distribution across artifacts: How designed artifacts illustrate school leadership practice." Paper presented at the 2001 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.
26.
Jordan, B.
& Henderson, A. (1995). “Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice.”Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.
27.
Kleinfeld, J.
(1992). “Learning to think like a teacher: The study of cases.” In J. H. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education.(pp. 33-49). New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
Kolodner, J. L.
, Crismond, D., Gray, J., Holbrook, J. & Puntambekar, S. (1998). “Learning by design from theory to practice.” In Proceedings of 1998 International Conference of the Learning Sciences, (pp. 16-22). Atlanta, GA.
29.
Kruse, S. D.
& Louis, K. S. (1995). “An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community.” In Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
30.
Lampert, M.
& Ball, D.L. (1998). Mathematics, teaching, and multimedia: Investigations of real practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
31.
Leithwood, K.
& Steinbach, M. (1989). “Expertise in principals’ problem solving.”Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(2), 126-161.
32.
Leithwood, K.
, Begley, P., & Cousins, B. (1992). Developing expert leadership for future schools. London: Falmer Press.
33.
Lortie, D. C.
(1975). Schoolteacher; a sociological study. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
34.
Merseth, K. K.
(1997). Case studies in educational administration. New York, Longman.
35.
Newmann, F. M.
& Wehlage, G. G. (1995). Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and educators by Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, University of Wisconsin.
36.
Nielsen, J.
, & Mack, R. L. (Eds.). (1994). Usability inspection methods. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
37.
Norman, D. A.
(1993). Things that make us smart. New York: Addison-Wesley.
38.
Odden, A.
& Kelly, C. (2002). Paying teachers for what they know and do: New and smarter compensation strategies to improve schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
39.
Pauline J. P.
& Mulcahy, D. (1999). “Meaning-making in qualitative research: Issues of rigour in a team-based approach.” Paper presented at the 1999 Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association Annual Conference. Melbourne, Australia.
40.
Purkey, C. S.
& Smith, M. S. (1983). “Effective schools: A review.”Elementary School Journal, 83(4).
41.
Ragin, C.
& Becker, H. S. (Eds.). (1992). What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Richert, A. E.
(1991). “Using teacher cases for reflection and enhanced understanding.” In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Staff development for education in the 90's.(pp. 113-132). New York: Teachers College Press.
43.
Ryle, G.
(1949). The concept of mind. New York: Barnes and Noble.
44.
Schon, D. A.
(1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
45.
Schon, D. A.
(1991). The reflective turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
46.
Schuler, D.
& Namioka, A. (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
47.
Shneiderman, B.
(1998). Designing the user interface. New York: Addison Wesley.
48.
Shrader, G.W.
(2000). Design research for the living curriculum. ProQuest Digital Dissertations available at http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/fullcit/9974362.
49.
Shrader, G.
, Williams, K., Walker, L., and Gomez L. (1999). “Work in the `work-circle': A description of collaborative design to improve teaching practice.” Paper presented at the 1999 American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
50.
Shulman, L.S.
(1992). “Toward a pedagogy of cases.” In J. Shulman (Ed.), Case methods in teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
51.
Simon, H. A.
(1993). “Decision making: Rational, nonrational, and irrational.”Educational Administration Quarterly, 29(3), 392-411.
52.
Spillane, J. P.
, Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). “Toward a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective.”Educational Researcher, (32)3.
53.
Steinkuehler, C. A.
, Derry, S. J., Woods, D. K., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2002). The STEP environment for distributed problem-based learning on the World Wide Web. Proceedings of the 2001 Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Conference. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
54.
Sykes, G.
, & Bird, T. (1992). “Teacher education and the case idea.” In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 18, 457-521. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
55.
Taylor, H.
(1996). “Perspective in spatial descriptions.”Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 371-391.
56.
Wassermann, S.
(1994). “Using cases to study teaching.”Phi Delta Kappan, 75(8), 602-611.
57.
Youngs, P.
, & Kings, M. B. (2002). “Principal leadership for professional development to build school capacity.”Educational Administration Quarterly, 38(5).
