The homogenized identity of game players provides fertile ground for platform studies to transcend the producer/consumer dichotomy and examine the process by which platforms shift the “labor–capital” contradiction. This study traces diverse player feedback triggered by grievances in the multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA) game Honor of Kings, interrogating the co-constitutive process between protracted resistance formations and the iterative refinement of gameplay mechanics. We propose the concept “reproduction of consumption” to foreground how users’ spontaneous acts become technologically mediated through algorithms into instruments of user proliferation. In contrast to other forms of game/labor, which we call labor or create within games, it exhibits the exploitative nature of unpaid labor in the sense of “playbor.” Thereby, extending resistance research to digital gaming, we argue that technologically mediated resistance formations constitute pivotal digital labor driving consumption reproduction in platform games, advancing critical understanding of how platforms shift labor–capital contradictions.
BaazM.LiljaM.SchulzM.VinthagenS. (2016). Defining and analyzing “resistance” possible entrances to the study of subversive practices. Alternatives, 41(3), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375417700170
2.
BaradK. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. https://doi.org/10.1086/345321
3.
CameronL. D. (2021). “Making out” while driving: Relational and efficiency games in the gig economy. Organization Science, 33(1), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1547
4.
ChewM. M. (2022). The significance and complexities of anti-corporate gamer activism: Struggles against the exploitation and control of game-worlds in 2000s China. Games and Culture, 17(4), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211042259
5.
ChewM. M. T. (2023). Chinese gold-farming in the 2000s: Worker empowerment and local development through video games-based digital labor. Games and Culture, 18(6), 783–803. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221134459
6.
ConsalvoM. (2009). Cheating: Gaining advantage in videogames. MIT Press.
7.
DugganJ.CarberyR.McDonnellA.ShermanU. (2023). Algorithmic HRM control in the gig economy: The app-worker perspective. Human Resource Management, 62(6), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22168
8.
DugganJ.ShermanU.CarberyR.McDonnellA. (2020). Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal, 30(1), 114–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12258
FoucaultM. (2007). Security, territory, population lectures at the College de France, 1977–78. Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan.
12.
FratiniA.HemerS. R.Chur-HansenA. (2022). Peeking behind the curtains: Exploring death and the body through patchwork ethnography. Anthropology in Action, 29(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2022.290301
13.
FriedmanG. (2014). Workers without employers: Shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2014.02.03
14.
GallowayA. R. (2004). Protocol: How control exists after decentralization. The MIT Press.
HollanderJ. A.EinwohnerR. L. (2004, December). Conceptualizing resistance. In Sociological forum (Vol. 19, pp. 533–554). Kluwer Academic Publishers-Plenum Publishers.
Honor of Kings. (2023, January 8). [Seriously disrupting the jungler gets you kicked from the game? AI takes over the match and deducts 12 points from your rating]. Honor of Kings Official Website. https://pvp.qq.com/web201706/newsdetail.shtml?tid=590352
HuangH. (2025). Weapons of the riders: Everyday algorithmic resistance of migrant food-delivery workers in China's gig economy. Journal of Contemporary China, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2025.2493883
23.
HynesM. (2013). Reconceptualizing resistance: Sociology and the affective dimension of resistance. The British Journal of Sociology, 64(4), 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12038
24.
JarrettJ. (2021). Gaming the gift: The affective economy of League of Legends “fair” free-to-play model. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521993932
25.
JarrettK. (2014). The relevance of “women's work” social reproduction and immaterial labor in digital media. Television & New Media, 15(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476413487607
26.
JasperJ. M. (1997). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography, and creativity in social movements. University of Chicago Press.
27.
JohanssonA.VinthagenS. (2016). Dimensions of everyday resistance: An analytical framework. Critical Sociology, 42(3), 417–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920514524604
JosephD. J. (2018). The discourse of digital dispossession: Paid modifications and community crisis on Steam. Games and Culture, 13(7), 690–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018756488
30.
KelloggK. C.ValentineM. A.ChristinA. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 366–410. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0174
31.
KoefoedM. (2017). Constructive resistance in Northern Kurdistan: Exploring the peace, development and resistance nexus. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 12(3), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15423166.2017.1366352
32.
KücklichJ. (2005). Precarious playbour: Modders and the digital games industry. The Fibreculture Journal, 5(1), 1–5.
33.
Le BretonC.GalièreS. (2023). The role of organizational settings in social learning: An ethnographic focus on food-delivery platform work. Human Relations, 76(7), 990–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221081295
34.
LeeY.ParkS. (2025, June). The rise of gamer-consumers: Anger, protests, and divisions in South Korean gamer activism. In Conference Proceedings of DiGRA 2025: Games at the Crossroads. Digital Games Research Association. https://doi.org/10.26503/dl.v2025i2.2481
35.
LiljaM. (2018). The politics of time and temporality in Foucault's theorisation of resistance: Ruptures, time-lags and decelerations. Journal of Political Power, 11(3), 419–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2018.1523319
LiljaM. (2022b). Theorising resistance formations: Reverse discourses, spatial resistance and networked dissent. Global Society, 36(3), 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2022.2052020
38.
LiljaM.VinthagenS. (2018). Dispersed resistance: Unpacking the spectrum and properties of glaring and everyday resistance. Journal of Political Power, 11(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2018.1478642
39.
LiuY.HuangH. (2025). Emotional labor as a situated social practice: Investigating the performance of emotional labor by women migrant workers in China's platform-based gig economy. Gender & Society, 39(2), 226–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432251317160
40.
ManzerolleV. (2010). Mobilizing the audience commodity: Digital labour in a wireless world. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 10(4), 455. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14776/11518
41.
NealonJ. (2007). Foucault beyond Foucault. Stanford University Press.
42.
NieborgD. B. (2015). Crushing candy: The free-to-play game in its connective commodity form. Social Media+ Society, 1(2), 2056305115621932. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115621932
43.
NieborgD. B.PoellT. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275–4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694
44.
OrtnerS. B. (1995). Resistance and the problem of ethnographic refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 37(1), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417500019587
45.
Parent-RocheleauX.ParkerS. K. (2022). Algorithms as work designers: How algorithmic management influences the design of jobs. Human Resource Management Review, 32(3), 100838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100838
46.
ParthS.BathiniD. R.KandathilG. (2023). Actions in phygital space: Work solidarity and collective action among app-based cab drivers in India. New Technology, Work and Employment, 38(2), 206–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12223
PostigoH. (2016). The socio-technical architecture of digital labor: Converting play into YouTube money. New Media & Society, 18(2), 332–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814541527
49.
RietveldJ.PloogJ. N.NieborgD. B. (2020). Coevolution of platform dominance and governance strategies: Effects on complementor performance outcomes. Academy of Management Discoveries, 6(3), 488–513. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2019.0064
50.
RyanC. (2015). Everyday resilience as resistance: Palestinian women practicing sumud. International Political Sociology, 9(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12099
ScottJ. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. Yale University Press.
53.
ScottJ. C. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
54.
ShutzbergM. (2020). Literal tricks of the trade. The possibilities and contradictions of Swedish physicians’ everyday resistance in the sickness certification process. Journal of Resistance Studies, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.63961/2025.118
55.
SilesI.Segura-CastilloA.SolísR.SanchoM. (2020). Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify: Enacting data assemblages in the Global South. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 2053951720923377. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720923377
ŠvelchJ. (2019). Resisting the perpetual update: Struggles against protocological power in video games. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1594–1612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819828987
58.
TaguchiH. L. (2011). Investigating learning, participation and becoming in early childhood practices with a relational materialist approach. Global Studies of Childhood, 1(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.2304/gsch.2011.1.1.36
59.
TassinariA.MaccarroneV. (2020). Riders on the storm: Workplace solidarity among gig economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017019862954
60.
ThorhaugeA. M. (2023). Games in the platform economy: Steam's tangled markets. Policy Press.
61.
ThorhaugeA. M. (2024). The Steam platform economy: From retail to player-driven economies. New Media & Society, 26(4), 1963–1983. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221081401
62.
ThorhaugeA. M.NielsenR. K. (2021). Epic, Steam, and the role of skin-betting in game (platform) economies. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21(1), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521993929
Van DijckJ.PoellT.De WaalM. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
65.
Van DoornN. (2017). Platform labor: On the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the “on-demand” economy. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 898–914. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1294194
Western Finance Media. (2025, August 15). [China's first game algorithm case goes to trial! Players demand that Honor of Kings disclose its matching mechanism, while Tencent defends itself on the grounds of “trade secrets.”] WeChat official account. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/vz2PJeExH0rXWo3wNPZy4A
68.
ZanescuA.FrenchM.LajeunesseM. (2021). Betting on DOTA 2's Battle Pass: Gamblification and productivity in play. New Media & Society, 23(10), 2882–2901. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820941381
69.
ZanescuA.LajeunesseM.FrenchM. (2021). Speculating on Steam: Consumption in the gamblified platform ecosystem. Journal of Consumer Culture, 21(1), 34–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540521993928
70.
ZhangL.FungA. Y. (2014). Working as playing? Consumer labor, guild and the secondary industry of online gaming in China. New Media & Society, 16(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813477077
71.
ZhaoM. (2025). “Ready worker two”: Gendered labor regime of platform-based game work in China. New Media & Society, 27(6), 3293-3313. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231222944
72.
ZhouN. (2024). Digital labor in free-to-play games: Player as commodity and interaction as labor in MMOGs. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 41(2), 137–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2024.2346226
