Are Inclusion and Diversity Even Possible? A Best-Fit Framework Synthesis of Video Game Development Ethnographies

Abstract

This article synthesizes qualitative evidence from ethnographies within video game development companies. A best-fit framework synthesis was conducted, combining the strengths of framework and thematic analysis to interpret the results of 55 ethnographic studies. The analysis revealed that the field of video game development is dominated by technologists and publishers with economic and cultural capitals determining the positions within the field. Within every studio cultural, economic, and social capitals significantly influence developers’ experiences, with persistent issues of job precarity, extended working hours, and underrepresentation of marginalized groups. Developers often face limited creative freedom and significant control which affects their work dynamics and inclusion efforts. Despite these challenges, some studies highlighted peripheral areas where diversity is actively sought and valued. The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions at multiple ecological levels to foster a more inclusive and diverse video game development industry.

Keywords

game development Best-Fit framework synthesis ethnographies inclusion capitals

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ash

(2010). Architectures of affect: Anticipating and manipulating the event in processes of videogame design and testing. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(4), 653–671. https://doi.org/10.1068/d9309

Ash

(2015). Theorizing studio space: Spheres and atmospheres in a video game design studio. In Farias

Wilkie

(Eds.), Studio studies: Operations, topologies & displacements (pp. 91–104). Routledge.

ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH. (2021). ATLAS.ti Windows (versión 9.1.7) [Qualitative data analysis software]. https://atlasti.com

Bailey

E. N.

Miyata

Yoshida

(2021). Gender composition of teams and studios in video game development. Games and Culture, 16(1), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019868381

Banks

(2009). Co-creative expertise: Auran games and fury—A case study. Media International Australia, 130(1), 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878 ( 0913000110

Banks

(2013). Co-creating videogames. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Banks

Humphreys

(2008). The labour of user co-creators: Emergent social network markets? Convergence, 14(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856508094660

Bourdieu

(1986). The forms of capital. In Richardson

J. G.

(Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Bourdieu

(1987). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.

10.

Bourdieu

(1988). Homo academicus. Stanford University Press.

11.

Bourdieu

(1990a). In other words. essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford University Press.

12.

Bourdieu

(1990b). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.

13.

Bourdieu

(1993). The field of cultural production. Columbia University Press.

14.

Bourdieu

(2002). Masculine domination. Stanford University Press.

15.

Bourdieu

Chamboredon

Passeron

(1991). The craft of sociology: Epistemological preliminaries. De Gruyter.

16.

Bourdieu

Wacquant

(1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. The University of Chicago Press.

17.

Browne

(2015). Jumping the Gap: Indie Labour and the Imagined Indie Community [Master Thesis, Concordia University].

18.

Bulut

(2014). Creativity and it´s Discontents: A Case Study of Precarious Playbour in the Video Game Industry [Doctoral Dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign].

19.

Bulut

(2015a). Glamor above, precarity below: Immaterial labor in the video game industry. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 32(3), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2015.1047880

20.

Bulut

(2015b). Playboring in the tester pit: The convergence of precarity and the degradation of fun in video game testing. Television & New Media, 16(3), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476414525241

21.

Bulut

(2020). A precarious game: The illusion of dream jobs in the video game industry. Cornell University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvh1dn1r

22.

Bulut

(2021). White masculinity, creative desires, and production ideology in video game development. Games and Culture, 16(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412020939873

23.

Cohendet

Simon

(2007). Playing across the playground: Paradoxes of knowledge creation in the videogame firm. Organizational Behavior, 28(5), 587–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.460

24.

Cohendet

Simon

(2016). Always playable: Recombining routines for creative efficiency at Ubisoft Montreal’s video game studio. Organization Science, 27(3), 614–632. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1062

25.

Coleman

Hand

Macauly

Newell

(2005, July 6-9). Approaches to auditory interface design - Lessons from computer games [Conference session]. ICAD 05-Eleventh Meeting of the International Conference on Auditory Display, Limerick, Ireland. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/213800490_Approaches_to_auditory_interface_design_-_Lessons_from_computer_games

26.

Consalvo

(2008). Crunched by passion: Women game developers and workplace challenges. In Kafai

Y. B.

Heeter

Denner

Sun

J. Y.

(Eds.), Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New perspectives on gender and gaming (pp. 177–192). MIT Press.

27.

Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2023). CASP Qualitative Studies Checklist. [online] Available at: https://casp-uk.net/checklists/casp-qualitative-studies-checklist-fillable.pdf

28.

D’Anastasio

(2018). Inside the culture of sexism at Riot Games. https://kotaku.com/inside-the-culture-of-sexism-at-riot-games-1828165483

29.

DeMaria

(2019). High score! Expanded. The illustrated history of electronic games. CRC Press.

30.

Desarrollo Español de Videojuegos. (2023). Libro blanco del desarrollo español de videojuegos. https://dev.org.es/images/stories/docs/2023_libro_blanco_dev_media.pdf

31.

Donovan

(2010). Replay: The history of video games. Yellow Ant.

32.

Dubois

L.-E.

Weststar

(2022). Games-as-a-service: Conflicted identities on the new front-line of video game development. New Media & Society, 24(10), 2332–2353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821995815

33.

Farmer

(2021). Arrested (game) development: Labour and lifestyles of independent video game creators in Cape Town. Social Dynamics, 47(3), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533952.2021.1999632

34.

Fisher

Harvey

(2012). Intervention for inclusivity: Gender politics and indie game development. Loading, 7(11), 25–40. https://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/118/183

35.

Flemming

Noyes

(2021). Qualitative evidence synthesis: where are we at? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921993276

36.

Foust

(2024). The habitus of misogyny: Bourdieu and the institutionalization of sexist abuse in the video games industry. Media, Culture & Society, 46(4), 762–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231219383

37.

Gestwicki

McNely

(2012, October 18-20). A case study of a five-step design thinking process in educational museum game design [Conference session]. Meaningful Play, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. https://meaningfulplay.msu.edu/2012/program.php?presentation=37&type=paper

38.

Gidley

Palmer

(2022). The impact of video game prototyping in an accelerator as viewed via spatial, temporal, and product scales. International Journal of Innovation, 10(3), 410–433. https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v10i3.20745

39.

Gidley

Palmer

Gharib

(2023). Suffering, recovery and participant experience in a video game development accelerator. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 12(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-07-2022-0023

40.

Goh

Clauss

(2018). The role of space and time in balancing conflicting pressures through routine dynamics. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 114067. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.172

41.

Gómez

(2014). Colombia in the global videogame industry: More than an emerging industry in more than an emerging country (MIB) [Master Thesis, Universidad EAFIT].

42.

Gómez

González-Pérez

M. A.

(2015). Internationalization of Video-Game Studios from Emerging Markets: A Colombian Case Study Based on an Activity-Based View. In Newburry

Gonzalez-Perez

M. A.

(Eds.), International Business in Latin America. The AIB-LAT Book Series (pp. 140–165). Palgrave Macmillan.

43.

Grandadam

Cohendet

Simon

(2013). Places, spaces and the dynamics of creativity: The video game industry in Montreal. Regional Studies, 47(10), 1701–1714. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.699191

44.

Grant

M. J.

Booth

(2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

45.

International Game Developers Association. (2022). Developer Satisfaction Survey 2021. Diversity in the Game Industry Report. https://igda-website.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/15161607/IGDA-DSS-2021-Diversity-Report_Final.pdf

46.

Johnson

R. S.

(2010). The digital Illusio: gender, work and culture in digital game production [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Iowa]. https://doi.org/10.17077/etd.0cwut566

47.

Johnson

R. S.

(2013). Toward greater production diversity: Examining social boundaries at a video game studio. Games and Culture, 8(3), 136–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412013481848

48.

Johnson

(2014). Hiding in plain sight: Reproducing masculine culture at a video game studio. Communication, Culture & Critique, 7(4), 578–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12023

49.

Johnson

(2018). Technomasculinity and its influence in video game production. In Taylor

Voorhees

(Eds.), Masculinities in play (pp. 249–262). Palgrave Macmillan.

50.

Jørgensen

(2019). Newcomers in a global industry: Challenges of a Norwegian game company. Games and Culture, 14(6), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412017723265

51.

Keller

(March 22, 2023). The US military will fight the next big war with Xbox-style video game controllers. Task and Purpose. https://taskandpurpose.com/tech-tactics/us-military-video-game-controllers-war/

52.

Keogh

(2015). Between triple-A, indie, casual, and DIY. In Oakley

O’Connor

(Eds.), The Routledge companion to the cultural industries (pp. 152–162). Routledge.

53.

Keogh

(2021). The cultural field of video game production in Australia. Games and Culture, 16(1), 116–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412019873746

54.

Keogh

(2023). The videogame industry does not exist: Why we should think beyond commercial game production. The MIT Press.

55.

Kerr

(2017). Global games production: Circulation and policy in the networked era. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

56.

Koleva

Tolmie

Brundell

Benford

Egglestone

(2015). From front-end to back-end and everything in-between: Work practice in game development. In Proceedings of the 2015 annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (pp. 141–150). https://doi.org/10.1145/2793107.2793131

57.

Kultima

(2018). Game Design Praxiology. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of Tampere]. https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/103315

58.

Lipkin

(2013). Examining indie's independence: The meaning of “indie” games, the politics of production, and mainstream cooptation. Loading…, 7(11), 8–24. https://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/122/149

59.

Liu

. (2004). The laws of cool: Knowledge work and the culture of information. University of Chicago Press.

60.

Nieborg

D. B

. (2011). Triple—A: The political economy of the blockbuster video game. [PhD Thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands].

61.

Nowotny

(1981). Women in public life in Austria. In Epstein

C. F.

Coser

R. L.

(Eds.), Access to power: Cross-national studies of women and elites (pp. 147–156). George Allen & Unwin.

62.

Noyes

Booth

Cargo

Flemming

Garside

Hannes

Harden

Harris

Lewin

Pantoja

Thomas

(2018). Cochrane qualitative and implementation methods group guidance series—paper 1: Introduction. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 97, 35–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.09.025

63.

O'Donnell

(2008). The work/play of the interactive new economy: video game development in the United States and India. [Doctoral Dissertation. Renssalaer Polytechnic Institute].

64.

O'Donnell

(2009). The everyday lives of video game developers: Experimentally understanding underlying systems/structures. In Carlson

(Ed.), Games as transformative works (Vol. 2). Special Issue Transformative Works and Cultures. https://doi.org/10.3983/twc.2009.073

65.

O'Donnell

(2011). Games are not convergence: The lost promise of digital production and convergence. Convergence, 17(3), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856511405766

66.

O'Donnell

(2012). This is not a software industry. In Zackariasson

Wilson

T. L.

(Eds.), The video game industry. Formation, present state, and future (pp. 17–33). Routledge.

67.

O'Donnell

(2014). Developeŕs Dilemma. The secret world of videogame creators. The MIT Press.

68.

Page

M. J.

McKenzie

J. E.

Bossuyt

P. M.

Boutron

Hoffmann

T. C.

Mulrow

C. D.

, Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinness, L. A., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

69.

Parker

Perks

M. E.

(2021). Streaming ambivalence: Livestreaming and indie game development. Convergence, 27(6), 1735–1752. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211027809

70.

Pelletier

(2022). Charming work: An ethnography of an indie game studio. Convergence, 28(2), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211072636

71.

Peppler

Kafai

(2007, September 24-28). What Videogame Making Can Teach Us About Literacy and Learning: Alternative Pathways into Participatory Culture [Conference session]. DiGRA International Conference: Situated Play, Tokyo, Japan http://www.digra.org/digital-library/forums/4-situated-play/

72.

Peppler

Kafai

(2010). Gaming fluencies: Pathways into a participatory culture in a community design studio. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/ijlm_a_00032

73.

Roessel

Švelch

(2021). 10. Who creates microtransactions: The production context of video game monetization. In Sotamaa

Svelch

(Eds.), Game production studies (pp. 197–216). Amsterdam University Press.

74.

Romine

(2016). Fractured Imaginaries: An Ethnography of Game Design. [Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Irvine]. https://escholarship.org/content/qt0xf0h1p2/qt0xf0h1p2_noSplash_455e6911bbdbfa13e7aab8575a9c9b82.pdf

75.

Schreier

(2020). As Naughty Dog Crunches On The Last Of Us II, Developers Wonder How Much Longer This Approach Can Last. Kotaku. https://kotaku.com/as-naughty-dog-crunches-on-the-last-of-us-ii-developer-1842289962

76.

Shaw

(2015). Gaming at the edge: Sexuality and gender at the margins of gamer culture. University of Minnesota Press.

77.

Sotamaa

(2021). Studying game development cultures. Games and Culture, 16(7), 835–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211005242

78.

Sotamaa

Svelch

(2021). Game production studies. Amsterdam University Press.

79.

Sotamaa

Tyni

Myöhänen

(2024). Even if the algorithm is a terrible workmate, you just need to learn to live with it’: Perceptions of data analytics among game industry professionals. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 27(4), 558–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/13675494231168568

80.

Stoetzler

Yuval-Davis

(2002). Standpoint theory situated knowledge and the situated imagination. Feminist Theory, 3(3), 315–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/146470002762492024

81.

Stone

(1995). The war of desire and technology at the close of the mechanical age. The MIT Press.

82.

Styhre

(2020). Indie video game development work. innovation in the creative economy. Palgrave Macmillan.

83.

Styhre

Remneland-Wikhamn

(2021). The video game as agencement and the image of new gaming experiences: The work of indie video game developers. Culture and Organization, 27(6), 476–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2021.1919893

84.

Tran

Biddle

(2008, November 3-5). Collaboration in serious game development: a case study. [Conference session]. FuturePlay Academic Games Conference, Toronto Ontario, Canada. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/1496984.1496993

85.

Tran

Biddle

(2009). An ethnographic study of collaboration in a game development team. Loading, 3(5), Article no. 70. https://journals.sfu.ca/loading/index.php/loading/article/view/70/63

86.

Tschang

F. T.

Szczcypula

(2006). Idea creation, constructivism and evolution as key characteristics in the videogame artifact design process. European Management Journal, 24(4), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2006.05.003

87.

Vang

Tschang

F. T.

(2013). Unpacking the spatial organization of the US videogames industry: Lessons for research on experience industry clusters. In Sunbo

Sørensen

(Eds.), Handbook on the experience economy (pp. 405–423). Edward Elgar.

88.

Wacquant

(2018). A concise genealogy and anatomy of habitus. In Medvetz

Sallaz

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of pierre bourdieu (pp. 528–536). Oxford University Press.

89.

Walfisz

Zackariasson

Wilson

(2006). Real-time strategy: Evolutionary game development. Business Horizons, 49(6), 487–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2006.04.001

90.

Westecott

Stein

Cheryl

Kashfia

(2019, August 6-10). In Situ: Researching corporate diversity initiatives with game developers. [Conference session]. DiGRA International Conference: Game, Play and the Emerging Ludo-Mix, Kyoto, Japan. http://openresearch.ocadu.ca/id/eprint/2793/

91.

Whitson

J. R.

(2018). Voodoo software and boundary objects in game development: How developers collaborate and conflict with game engines and art tools. New Media & Society, 20(7), 2315–2332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817715020

92.

Whitson

J. R.

(2020). What can we learn from studio studies ethnographies? A “messy” account of game development materiality, learning, and expertise. Games and Culture, 15(3), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412018783320

93.

Woodward

(2018). The relevance of bourdieús concepts for studying the intersections of poverty, race, and culture. In Medvetz

Sallaz

(Eds.), The Oxford handbook of pierre bourdieu (pp. 629–644). Oxford University Press.

94.

Young

C. J.

(2018). Game Changers: Everyday Gamemakers and the Development of the Video Game Industry (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Toronto. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/89734

95.

Yuval-Davis

(2015). Situated intersectionality and social inequality. Raisons Politiques, 58(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.3917/rai.058.0091

96.

Yuval-Davis

(2016). Power, intersectionality and the politics of belonging. In Harcourt

(Ed.), The palgrave handbook of gender and development (pp. 367–381). Palgrave Macmillan.

97.

Zackariasson

Styhre

Wilson

(2006a). Phronesis and creativity: Knowledge work in video game development. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(4), 419–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2006.00400.x

98.

Zackariasson

Walfisz

Wilson

T. L.

(2006b). Management of creativity in video game development: A case study. Services Marketing Quarterly, 27(4), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1300/J396v27n04_05

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

0.02 MB