Combining a historical perspective and game studies and using information from the BoardGameGeek online database, we analyze how board wargames simulate the Indian wars and represent Native North Americans. Based on 125 games published between 1960 and 2023, first, we identified the main historical moments reproduced, followed by an iconographic and formal analysis of these games. The conclusions reveal that, like other cultural products (novels, films, or video games), the focus is on the mythical founding moments of the history of the United States, mainly the late 19th-century war on the prairies and conflicts between European powers to gain control of the continent. Despite everything, it is observed that board wargames do not avoid traumatic themes such as raids on settlements and that in recent years there have been dynamics that offer new themes and perspectives dealing with the subject.
AlongeG.FassoneR. (2023). Two, three … many Vietnams: Anti-colonial struggle, postcolonialism, and counterinsurgency in historical boardgames. In MochockiM. (Ed.), Heritage, memory and identity in postcolonial board games (pp. 11–25). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003356318
2.
AmbrosioT.RossJ. (2021). Performing the cold war through the ‘the best board game on the planet’: The ludic geopolitics of twilight struggle. Geopolitics, 28(2), 846–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1951251
3.
AmbrosioT.RossJ. (2022). The war on terror beyond the barrel of a gun: The procedural rhetorics of the boardgame Labyrinth. Media, War & Conflict, 16(4), 495–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352221108824
BoritC.BoritM.OlsenP. (2018). Representations of colonialism in three popular, modern board games: Puerto Rico, Struggle of Empires, and Archipelago. Open Library of Humanities, 4(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.16995/olh.211
10.
BuchananH. (2016). Liberty or death: The American insurrection[Board game]. GMT Games.
11.
CarpenterM. J. (2021). Replaying colonialism: Indigenous national sovereignty and its limits in strategic videogames. The American Indian Quarterly, 45(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2021.a776046
CastroW. L. (2008). Stripped: Clothing and identity in colonial captivity narratives. Early American Studies, 6(1), 104–136. https://doi.org/10.1353/eam.2008.0003
CozensP. (2016). The earth is weeping: The epic story of the Indian wars for the American West. Knopf.
19.
EagleJ. (2019). War games. Rutgers University Press.
20.
FitzpatrickT. (1991). The figure of captivity: The cultural work of the puritan captivity narrative. American Literary History, 3(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/alh/3.1.1
21.
FrascaG. (2003). Simulation versus narrative. Introduction to Ludology. In WolfM. J. P.PerronB. (Eds.), The video game theory reader. Routledge.
HernándezO. (2008). Tiempo de indias: Crónicas e imágenes del nuevo mundo y la expresión literaria latinoamericana. Sapiens. Revista Universitaria de Investigación, 9(1), 213–235. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=41011135011
KapellM. W.ElliotA.(Eds) (2013). Playing with the past. Digital games and the simulation of history, Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781628928259
30.
KilpatrickJ. (1999). Celluloid Indians: Native Americans and film. University of Nebraska Press.
31.
KlingS. (2022). Fort Jefferson attack game [Board game]. The Historical Game Company, LLC.
32.
KnightO. (1993). Following the Indian wars: The story of the newspaper correspondents among the Indian campaigners. University of Oklahoma Press.
LironL. (2019). Indian wars: Custer [Board game]. Historic-One.
35.
MannucciA. (1981). Little big horn [Board game]. Eurogames.
36.
MortensenT. E.LinderothJ.BrownA. M. (Eds) (2015). The dark side of game play: Controversial issues in playful environments. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315738680
NewbergS. (1979). I will fight no more... forever [Board game]. Simulations Canada.
39.
PlanellsA. J. (2021). Europe simulates Europe: How European analogue games frame their own identity. In Navarro-RemesalV.Pérez-LatorreÓ. (Eds.), Perspectives on the European videogame (pp. 193–208). Amsterdam University Press.
40.
PoniskeJ. (2010). King Philip's war [Board game]. Multi-Man Publishing.
41.
PoniskeJ. (2018). Blood on the Ohio: Washington's Indian war 1789-1794, [Board game]. Compass Games LLC.
42.
PoniskeJ. (2022). Plains Indian war [Board game]. GMT Games.
43.
RamseyC. T.Derounian-StodolaK. Z. (2004). Dime novels. In SamuelsS. (Ed.), A companion to American fiction 1780–1865 (pp. 262–273). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999219.ch24
RohrbaughP. (2017/2020). Battles of the old Northwest Serie [Board games]. High Flying Dice Games.
47.
Rubio-CampilloX. (2022). Identificación computacional de temáticas históricas en contextos de aprendizaje informal: El caso de los juegos de mesa. Clio. History and History Teaching, 48, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.26754/ojs_clio/clio.2022487369
48.
RuhnkeV. (2001). Wilderness war [Board game]. GMT Games.
SchutK. (2007). Strategic simulations and our past. The bias of computer games in the presentation of history. Games and Culture, 2(3), 213–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412007306202
52.
ŠislerV. (2016). Contested memories of war in Czechoslovakia 38–89: Assassination: Designing a serious game on contemporary history. Game Studies, 16(2).
53.
SpivakG. (1994). Can the subaltern speak? In WilliamsP.ChrismanL. (Eds.), Colonial discourse and postcolonial theory (pp. 66–111). Columbia University Press.
54.
SterczewskiP. (2021). Machine(s) of narrative security: Mnemonic hegemony and Polish games about violent conflicts. In HammondP.PötzchH. (Eds.), War games. Memory, militarism and the subject of play (pp. 111–134).
55.
SucklingM. (2023). Design elements in postcolonial commercial historical board wargames. In MochockiM. (Ed.), Heritage, memory and identity in postcolonial board games (pp. 26–44). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003356318
56.
TaylorM. (2005). The battle of the Little Bighorn [Board game]. Legion Wargames LLC.
57.
TaylorM. (2009). The battle of Adobe Walls [Board game]. Legion Wargames LLC.
58.
TaylorL. N.WhalenZ. (2008). Playing the past: History and nostalgia in video games. Vanderbilt University Press.
59.
TodorovT. (1987). La conquista de América: el problema del otro. Siglo XXI.
60.
ToppenJ. (2013). Navajo war [Board game]. GMT Games.
UricchioW. (2005). Simulation, history, and computer games. In RaessensJ.GoldsteinJ. (Eds.), Handbook of computer game studies (pp. 327–338). The MIT Press.
64.
VenegasA. (2020). Pasado interactivo. Memoria e historia en el videojuego. Vitoria-gasteiz: Sans soleil ediciones, 2020 [ISBN: 978-84-121578-1-9]. Eikon / Imago, 11, 429–431. https://doi.org/10.5209/eiko.79553
65.
WillsJ. (2008). Pixel cowboys and silicon gold mines: Videogames of the American west. Pacific Historical Review, 77(2), 273–303. https://doi.org/10.1525/phr.2008.77.2.273
66.
WillsJ. (2019). Gamer nation: Video games and American culture. Johns Hopkins University Press.
WrightE. (2021). Rockstar games, red dead redemption, and narratives of “progress”. European journal of American studies, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.17300
69.
ZaludR. (1976). Custer's last stand [Board game]. Battleline.
