The Game-Like Experience of Virtual Reality Art: Sensational Players and Critical Audiences

Abstract

This article delves into why audiences perceive virtual reality (VR) art as a game-like experience and how it impacts audiences’ reception of culture by examining two VR art pieces and their respective audience responses in focus group discussions. Through qualitative analysis, two factors are identified: the cognitive association of VR with gaming due to audiences’ preconceptions about VR, and the immersive environment of VR creating the “magic circle” that fosters the sense of play. The study argues that the intersection of VR and art generates the affordance allowing audiences to “play” with culture. However, the “not-serious” feature of play in VR may work against the norms and mores of a specific culture in the real world, especially when it relates to religious or ethnic culture. This article sheds light on the implications of the game-like experience in VR for creating VR applications beyond gaming, particularly in art and cultural heritage.

Keywords

virtual reality play game culture audience study art cultural heritage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aichner

Jacob

(2015). Measuring the degree of corporate social media use. International Journal of Market Research, 57(2), 257–276. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-2015-018

Allal-Chérif

. (2022). Intelligent cathedrals: Using augmented reality, virtual reality, and artificial intelligence to provide an intense cultural, historical, and religious visitor experience. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178, 121604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121604

Bailenson

(2018). Experience on demand: What virtual reality is, how it works, and what it can do. WW Norton & Company.

Bender

(2021). Virtual realities: Case studies in immersion and phenomenology. Springer Nature.

Berger

(2008). Ways of seeing. Penguin UK.

Biocca

Levy

M. R.

(2013). Communication in the age of virtual reality. Routledge.

Bloor

(2001). Focus groups in social research. Sage.

Boellstorff

(2015). Coming of age in second life: An anthropologist explores the virtually human. Princeton University Press.

Boellstorff

Nardi

Pearce

, et al. (2012) Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Princeton University Press.

10.

Buchanan

(1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637

11.

Carrozzino

Bergamasco

(2010). Beyond virtual museums: Experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(4), 452–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2010.04.001

12.

Chambers

(2002) Popular culture: The metropolitan experience. Routledge.

13.

Champion

(2011) Playing with the past. Springer, pp. 129–155.

14.

Champion

(2015). Defining cultural agents for virtual heritage environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 24(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00234

15.

Copier

(2005) Connecting Worlds. Fantasy Role-Playing Games, Ritual Acts and the Magic Circle. DiGRA Conference.

16.

Dibbell

(1994) A rape in cyberspace or how an evil clown, a Haitian trickster spirit, two wizards, and a cast of dozens turned a database into a society. Annual Survey of American Law. 471.

17.

DigitalDunhuang (n.d.) Mogao Grottoes Cave 61. Available at: https://www.e-dunhuang.com/cave/10.0001/0001.0001.0061 (accessed November 13 2021)

18.

Donald

(2006) Art and cognitive evolution. In The artful mind: Cognitive science and the riddle of human creativity. Oxford University Press, pp.3–20.

19.

Flach

J. M.

Holden

J. G.

(1998). The reality of experience: Gibson's way. Presence, 7(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565550

20.

Gibson

J. J.

(2014) The ecological approach to visual perception: Classic edition. Psychology Press.

21.

Gilbert

S. B.

(2016). Perceived realism of virtual environments depends on authenticity. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 24(4), 322–324. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00276

22.

Graham

(2020). Echo VR has Officially Launched for Oculus Quest. Available at: https://www.vrfocus.com/2020/08/echo-vr-has-officially-launched-for-oculus-quest/ (accessed June 25 2021)

23.

Grau

(2003). Virtual art: From illusion to immersion. MIT press.

24.

Grenfell

Hardy

(2007). Art rules: Pierre Bourdieu and the visual arts. Berg.

25.

Guynup

(2016). Virtual reality, game design, and virtual art galleries. In England

Bryan-Kinns

Schiphorst

(Eds.), Curating the digital: Space for art and interaction (pp. 149–166). Springer.

26.

Han

P.-H.

Chen

Y.-S.

Liu

I.-S.

, et al. (2019). A compelling virtual tour of the Dunhuang cave with an immersive head-mounted display. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 40(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2019.2936753

27.

Huizinga

(1998). Homo Ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Routledge.

28.

ICOMOS (2008). The ICOMOS charter for the interpretation and presentation of cultural heritage sites. International Journal of Cultural Property, 15(14), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739108080417

29.

ISPR (2000) The concept of presence: Explication statement. Available at: https://smcsites.com/ispr/ (accessed August 10 2020)

30.

Jauss

H. R.

Benzinger

(1970). Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. New Literary History, 2(1), 7–37. https://doi.org/10.2307/468585

31.

Jeon

M. P.

Fishwick

(2017). Special issue on arts, aesthetics, and performance in telepresence: Guest editors’ introduction: Homo Ludens in virtual environments. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 26(2), iii–vii. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_e_00295

32.

Klabbers

J. H.

(2009). The Magic Circle: Principles of gaming & simulation. Brill.

33.

Loban

(2022). Torres strait virtual reality: A reflection on the intersection between culture, game design and research. Games and Culture, 17(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120211020383

34.

Lombard

(2000). Resources for the study of presence: Presence explication. Available at: https://smcsites.com/ispr/ (accessed December 1 2019)

35.

Lorber

Zimmermann

(2020) History in games: Contingencies of an authentic past. Transcript Verlag.

36.

Manning

(2017). In vivo coding. In Matthes

(Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–12). Wiley-Blackwell.

37.

Mäyrä

(2019). The player as a hybrid: Agency in digital game cultures. GAME: The Italian Journal of Game Studies, 1(8), 29–45. https://www.gamejournal.it/?p=3979

38.

Molesworth

Denegri-Knott

(2007). Digital play and the actualization of the consumer imagination. Games and Culture, 2(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412006298209

39.

Nielsen

(2009). Play. In Embree

H. R. S. L.

(Ed.), Handbook of phenomenological aesthetics (pp. 265–268). Springer.

40.

Osterwold

(2003) Pop art. Taschen.

41.

Penny

Smith

Sengers

, et al. (2001). Traces: Embodied immersive interaction with semi-autonomous avatars. Convergence, 7(2), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/135485650100700205

42.

Pujol-Tost

(2018). Cultural presence in virtual archaeology: An exploratory analysis of factors. PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 26(03), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00296

43.

Reed

(2016). The Mogao Caves as Cultural Embassies. Available at: https://bulletin.hds.harvard.edu/the-mogao-caves-as-cultural-embassies/ (accessed November 10 2021)

44.

Riva

Mantovani

(2000). The need for a socio-cultural perspective in the implementation of virtual environments. Virtual Reality, 5(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01418974

45.

Riva

Waterworth

Murray

(2014). Measuring social presence in team-based digital games. In Riva

Waterworth

Murray

(Eds.), Interacting with presence: HCI and the sense of presence in computer-mediated environments (pp. 83–101). Sciendo Migration.

46.

Ryan

M-L.

(2015) Narrative as virtual reality 2: Revisiting immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Johns Hopkins University Press.

47.

Scheuerl

(1997). Das Spiel. Beltz.

48.

Schuemie

M. J.

Van Der Straaten

Krijn

, et al. (2001). Research on presence in virtual reality: A survey. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4(2), 183–201. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493101300117884

49.

Slater

Wilbur

(1997). A framework for immersive virtual environments (FIVE): Speculations on the role of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 6(6), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.6.603

50.

Sobchack

(1992). The address of the eye: A phenomenology of film experience. Princeton University Press.

51.

Stephenson

(1992). Snow crash. Bantam Books.

52.

Stogner

M. B.

(2011). The immersive cultural museum experience–creating context and story with new media technology. International Journal of the Inclusive Museum, 3(3), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-2014/CGP/v03i03/44339

53.

Strain

(1999). Virtual VR. Convergence, 5(2), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/135485659900500202

54.

Tasa

U. B.

Görgülü

(2010). Meta-art: Art of the 3-D user-created virtual worlds. Digital Creativity, 21(2), 100–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626261003786251

55.

UNESCO (1987) World heritage list Mogao Caves. Available at: https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/440/ (accessed April 16 2021)

56.

von Lünen

Lewis

K. J.

Litherland

, et al. (2019) Historia Ludens: the playing historian. Routledge.

57.

Wang

(2019). Maybe it's time to refresh the art world a little bit. Hong Kong.

58.

Weber

(1946). Science as a vocation. In: Tauber

A. I.

(Ed.) Science and the quest for reality. Springer, pp.382–394.

59.

Wienrich

Schindler

Döllinqer

, et al. (2018) Social presence and cooperation in large-scale multi-user virtual reality-the relevance of social interdependence for location-based environments. 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 207–214.

60.

Witmer

B. G.

Singer

M. J.

(1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence, 7(3), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686

61.

Wolf

(2013). Aesthetic illusion. In Wolf

Bernhart

Mahler

(Eds.), Immersion and distance.: Aesthetic illusion in literature and other media (pp. 1–63). Brill.

62.

Zhao

(2021). Playfulness, realism and authenticity in cultural presence: A case study of virtual heritage players. Body, Space & Technology, 20(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.16995/bst.352