This paper introduces a model for analyzing the aesthetic value of game rules. Drawing on Nguyen's theory of agential aesthetics, this paper argues that the aesthetic value of a rule is related to the ways in which it contains modalities of agency. Using football's (soccer) offside rule as a case study, this article provides a way of thinking about the aesthetics of game rules.
BestD. (1988). Sport is not art. In MorganW. J.MeierK. V. (Eds.), Philosophic inquiry in sport (pp. 527–539). Human Kinetics Publishers.
6.
BolukS.LeMieuxP. (2017). Metagaming: Playing, competing, spectating, cheating, trading, making, and breaking videogames. University of Minnesota Press; JSTOR.
7.
BordnerS. S. (2015). Call ‘Em as they are: What’s wrong with blown calls and what to do about them. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 42(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2014.911096
8.
BoyerS.MacMahonC.RécopéM.Rix-LièvreG. (2020). The assistant referees’ activity in refereeing elite football: Preoccupations when not judging offside. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 48, 101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101662
9.
CailloisR. (2001). Man, play and games. University of Illinois Press.
10.
ChenR.DavidsonN. P. (2022). English Premier League manager perceptions of video assistant referee (VAR) decisions during the 2019-2020 season. Soccer & Society, 23(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14660970.2021.1918680
11.
CollinsH. (2010). The philosophy of umpiring and the introduction of decision-aid technology. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 37(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2010.9714772
12.
CritchleyS. (2017). What we think about when we think about soccer. Penguin Books.
ElcombeT. L. (2012). Sport, aesthetic experience, and art as the ideal embodied metaphor. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 39(2), 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2012.725901
FasoldF.WührP.MemmertD. (2019). Response requirements affect offside judgments in football (soccer). Psychological Research, 83(5), 924–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0902-6
17.
GaverB. (2009). Designing for homo ludens, still. In BinderT.L OwgrenJ.MalmborgL. (Eds.), (Re)Searching the digital bauhaus (pp. 163–178). Springer.
18.
GumbrechtH. U. (2006). In praise of athletic beauty. Belknap Press.
19.
HughsonJ.InglisD. (2002). Inside the beautiful game: Towards a Merleau-Pontian phenomenology of soccer play. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 29(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2002.9714619
20.
HuizingaJ. (1971). Homo ludens. Beacon Press.
21.
HunickeR.LeBlancM.ZubekR. (2004). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI, 4(1).
LacerdaT.MumfordS. (2010). The genius in art and in sport: A contribution to the investigation of aesthetics of sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, 37(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2010.9714775
MatherG. (2020). A step to VAR: The vision science of offside calls by video assistant referees. Perception, 49(12), 1371–1374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006620972006
30.
NguyenC. T. (2020). Games: Agency as art. Oxford University Press.
31.
PanseN.MahabaleshwarkarA. (2020). A dataset & methodology for computer vision based offside detection in soccer. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Multimedia Content Analysis in Sports, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3422844.3423055
SchillerF.SnellR. (2012). On the aesthetic education of man. Dover Publications.
34.
SengersP.GaverB. (2006). Staying open to interpretation: Engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/1142405.1142422
35.
SharpJ. (2015). Works of game on the aesthetics of games and art. The MIT Press.
36.
SicartM. (2008). Defining game mechanics. Game Studies, 8(2).
37.
SicartM. (2014). Play matters. The MIT Press.
38.
SicartM. (2015). Loops and metagames: Understanding game design structures. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG 2015), June 22-25, 2015. Pacific Grove, CA, USA.
SuitsB. (1978). The grasshopper: Games, life and utopia. University of Toronto Press.
41.
SvantessonD. J. B. (2014). Could technology resurrect the dignity of the FIFA World Cup refereeing?Computer Law & Security Review, 30(5), 569–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2014.07.004
42.
The Footbal Zone (2021, October 11). Why wasn’t Mbappe’s Goal offisde in the Nations League Final betwee Spain and France? [YouTube]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZ7r6B5M7PI
WenzelC. H. (2016). Aesthetics and rule-following. Contributions of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, 24, 260–262.
46.
WilsonD.SicartM. (2010). Now it’s personal: On abusive game design. In Proceedings of the International Academic Conference on the Future of Game Design and Technology (Futureplay '10), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/1920778.1920785
47.
WilsonJ. (2008). Inverting the pyramid: The history of football tactics. Orion Books.
48.
ZubekR. (2020). Elements of game design. The MIT Press.
