As games grow in popularity, the importance of outreach has begun to be recognized within the field of historical games studies. However, much outreach has focused on education, consultancy, or the development of new games. While these are all valuable, this article draws attention to a fourth category of outreach that has hitherto been underutilized: digital criticism, particularly in the format of the Let’s Play. Embodied in a “streamer-historian,” this style of outreach offers great potential as a tool to analyze historical games. This article combines approaches drawn from discourse theory with case studies of recent games and lessons drawn from practical work on digital platforms by the author and others, arguing that the streamer-historian occupies a unique and crucial position within the discursive cycle of games that makes it a potent tool of outreach.
AustinJ. (2021). “The hardest battles are fought in the mind”: Representations of mental illness in Ninja Theory’s Hellblade: Senua’s sacrifice. Game Studies, 21(4). http://gamestudies.org/2104/articles/austin
3.
BellT. (2001). The religious reuseof Roman Structures in Anglo-Saxon England [PhD Dissertation, University of Oxford]. Oxford University Research Archive. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:f631fee6-5081-4c40-af85-61725776cbf6
ChapmanA. (2016). Digital games as history: How videogames represent the past and offer access to historical practice. Routledge.
6.
ClydeJ.HopkinsH.WilkinsonG. (2012). Beyond the ‘historical’ simulation: Using theories of history to inform scholarly game design. Loading, 6(9), 3–16.
7.
Cook. (2001). Njáls saga(Trans.). Penguin Books.
8.
CopplestoneT. (2017). But that’s not accurate: The differing perceptions of accuracy in cultural-heritage videogames between creators, consumers and critics. Rethinking History, 21(3), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2017.1256615
9.
De GrootJ. (2015). Consuming history: Historians and heritage in contemporary popular culture (2nd ed.). Routledge.
10.
DurandM.[@TriFreako]. (2021, October 20). I absolutely love these questions because this is typically the debates we had. Another one was about Ealric’s right to [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/TriFreako/status/1450878955905503234
GlasR. (2015). Vicarious play: Engaging the viewer in let’s play videos. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 5(1–2), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1386/ejpc.5.1-2.81_1
14.
HiriartJ. (2021). Life was really hard! Designing and using digital games to explore medieval life in primary schools. In C. Ariese (Ed.), Return to the interactive past (pp. 157–172). Sidestone Press.
15.
HoughtonR. (2021). Scholarly history through digital games; pedagogical practice as research method. In ArieseC.BoomK.van den HoutB.MolA.PolitopoulosA (Eds.), Return to the interactive past (pp. 137–156). Sidestone Press.
Ludohistory. (2022, February 9). Historians vs new world – Bill Farley (Archaeology and YouTube). YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wo17FuVzNSg.
MolA.PolitopoulosA.ArieseC.van den HoutB.BoomK.(2021). Introduction. In ArieseC.BoomK.van den HoutB.MolA.PolitopoulosA. (Eds.), Return to the interactive past (pp. 7–17). Sidestone Press.
29.
MunslowA. (2006). Deconstructing history (2nd Ed.). Routledge.
30.
NohrR. (2014). The game is a medium: The game is a message. In WinnerlingT.KerschbaumerF. (Eds.), Early modernity and video games (pp. 2–23). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
QuirogaS. (2022). White mythic space: Racism, the first world war, and ›battlefield 1‹. De Gruyter.
35.
Rambaran-OlmM. (2019, November 4). Misnaming the medieval: Rejecting “Anglo-Saxon” studies. History Workshop Online. https://www.historyworkshop.org.uk/misnaming-the-medieval-rejecting-anglo-saxon-studies/.
SalvatiA.BullingerJ. (2013). Selective authenticity and the playable past. In KapellM.ElliotA. (Eds.), Playing with the past: Digital games and the simulation of history (pp. 153–168). Bloomsbury.
TaylorE. [@Emm3tTaylor]. (2021, May 25). 1 #MAMG21 While medieval European literature inspires many historical games, they often struggle with their inspiration’s Christian context. Scion 2e [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/Emm3tTaylor/status/1397198532713582601
45.
WesterdahlC. (2010). ‘Horses are strong at sea’: The liminal aspect of the maritime cultural landscape. In AndersonA.BarrettJ.BoyleK. (Eds.), The global origins and development of seafaring (pp. 275–287). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
46.
WinnerlingT. (2014). The eternal recurrence of all bits: How historicizing video game series transform factual history into affective historicity. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 8(1), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.7557/23.6432
47.
New World (PC Version) [Video Game]. (2021). Amazon Game Studios.
