It seems intuitive to conflate the gamic gaze with the player’s act of looking. To do so, however, would be to inherit from the first wave of psychoanalytic screen theory a misleading presupposition that the gaze is synonymous with the look. Taking influence from new Lacanian film theorists such as Joan Copjec and Todd McGowan, this article contends that the gamic gaze is an object in the visual field of play that disrupts the mastery of the player’s look. I develop this argument through an analysis of the 2017 videogame Gorogoa. By confronting the player with the gaze, Gorogoa reveals that the jouissance (enjoyment) of videogame play consists in the player’s unconscious drive to fail rather than their conscious wish for pleasure or mastery. To borrow terminology from Copjec, the gamic gaze marks the point of the player’s culpability—rather than visibility—in the visual field of play.
ChesherC. (2007). Neither Gaze nor Glance, but Glaze: Relating to Home Console Game Screens. SCAN: Journal of Media Arts Culture, 1(1), 98-117.
10.
ChessS. (2017). Ready Player Two: Women Gamers and Designed Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
CopjecJ. (2015 [1994]). Read My Desire: Lacan Against the Historicists. London and New York: Verso.
12.
de LauretisT. (1987). Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory, Film, and Fiction. Bloomington and Indiana: Indiana University Press.
13.
Dyer-WithefordN.,de PeuterG. (2009). Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
FreudS. (1955 [1909]). Notes Upon a Case of Obsessional Neurosis. In StracheyJ. (Ed.), (Trans.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Volume X, pp. 153-318). London: The Hogarth Press.
15.
FreudS. (1962 [1899]). Screen Memories. In StracheyJ. (Ed.), (Trans.), The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud (Volume III, pp. 301-322). London: The Hogarth Press.
16.
FreudS. (1990 [1961]). Beyond the Pleasure Principle. In StracheyJ. (Ed.), (Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
17.
FriedlanderJ. (2008). Feminine Look: Sexuation, Spectatorship, Subversion. Albany: State University of New York Press.
18.
JuulJ. (2013). The Art of Failure: An Essay on the Pain of Playing Video Games. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19.
KeoghB. (2018). A Play of Bodies: How We Perceive Videogames. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20.
KirkpatrickG. (2011). Aesthetic Theory and the Video Game. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
21.
KirkpatrickG. (2013). Computer Games and the Social Imaginary. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
22.
LacanJ. (1997 [1986]). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book VII: The Ethics of Psychoanalysis 1959-1960. In PorterD. (Ed.), (Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
23.
LacanJ. (2006 [1949]). The Mirror Stage as Formative of the I Function as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience. In FinkB. (Ed.), (Trans.). Écrits: The First Complete Edition in English (pp. 75-81). New York: Norton.
24.
LacanJ. (2014 [2004]). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book X: Anxiety. In PriceA. R. (Ed.), (Trans.). Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.
25.
LacanJ. (1998 [1973]). The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XI: Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis. In SheridanA. (Ed.), (Trans.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
26.
LaplancheJ. (1999). Notes on Afterwardsness. In FletcherJ. (Ed.), Essays on Otherness. (pp. 264-269). London: Routledge.
27.
LovelocksL. (2017). Gorogoa – Complete Playthrough – Let’s Play Blind Gameplay and Story Discussion[YouTube video]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfsqCrYmFFA (accessed 19 April 2021).
McGowanT. (2003). Looking for the Gaze: Lacanian Film Theory and its Vicissitudes. Cinema Journal, 42(3), 28-29.
30.
McGowanT. (2007). The Real Gaze: Film Theory After Lacan. Albany: State University of New York Press.
31.
McGowanT. (2013). Enjoying What We Don’t Have: The Political Project of Psychoanalysis. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
32.
McGowanT. (2016). Capitalism and Desire: The Psychic Cost of Free Markets. New York: Columbia University Press.
33.
McGowanT. (2019). The Lust for Power and the Logic of Enjoyment. Crisis & Critique, 6(1), 205-224.
34.
MetzC., (1982). The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. In BrittonC.WilliamsA.BrewsterB.GuzzettiA. (Eds.), (Trans.). Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
35.
MulveyL. (1975). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6-18.
36.
NdalianisA. (2012). The Horror Sensorium: Media and the Senses. Jefferson: McFarland.
37.
PaulC. A. (2018). The Toxic Meritocracy of Video Games: Why Gaming Culture is the Worst. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38.
PhillipsA. (2020). Gamer Trouble: Feminist Confrontations in Digital Culture. New York: New York University Press.
39.
PiasC. (2011). The Game Player’s Duty: The User as the Gestalt of the Ports. In HuhtamoE.ParikkaJ. (Eds.), Media Archaeology: Approaches, Applications, Implications (pp. 164-183). Berkley: University of California Press.
40.
RubergB. (2019). Video Games Have Always Been Queer. New York: New York University Press.
41.
RutiM. (2018). Distillations: Theory, Ethics, Affect. New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic.
42.
TaylorL. (2003). When Seams Fall Apart: Video Game Space and the Player. Game Studies, 3(2), n.p. Retrieved fromhttp://www.gamestudies.org/0302/taylor/ (accessed 19 April 2021).
43.
TylerT. (2013). New Tricks. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 18(1), 65-82.
44.
VäliahoP. (2014). Videogames and the cerebral subject: On playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3. Body & Society, 20(3&4), 113-139.
45.
WarkM. (2007). Gamer Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
46.
WolfeJ. (2017). GOROGOA – Breathtaking Puzzle Adventure – Full Playthrough. [YouTube video]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiFv3F_-Rt4 (accessed 5 August 2021).
47.
ŽižekS. (2006). The Parallax View. Cambridge: MIT Press.
