In game studies, meaningful play is commonly discussed and situated through Salen and Zimmerman’s (2004) definition describing it as the integrated and discernible relationship between player actions and system outcomes within the context of the game. However, this overlooks other ways that play can be meaningful. Based on observation and interviews with 20 Australian players, this article examines experiences with death in the tabletop role-playing game Dungeons & Dragons (D&D). In the context of meaningful play (Salen & Zimmerman, 2004) and positive negative experiences (Hopeametsä, 2008), we discuss (1) the impact of shared physical and social realities on death in D&D, (2) the design of death in D&D, and (3) how death in D&D shapes the future play and lives of players. From this, we argue that play can have meaning that transcends game boundaries, subsequently proposing the concept of “pivotal play” to describe appealing, memorable, and transformative play experiences.
AllisonF.CarterM.GibbsM. (2015). Good frustrations: The paradoxical pleasure of fearing death in DayZ. In Proceedings of OzCHI2015 (pp. 119-123). Victoria, Australia, 7-10 December 2015. The University of Melbourne.
2.
AnchorR. (1978). History and play: Johan Huizinga and his critics. History and Theory, 17(1), 63-93.
3.
AndrewK. D. (2014). NPC memorials and scrolls of ‘raise dead’: Mortality and liminal transitions in the text-based role-play of Neverwinter Nights and Guild Wars 2 (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved fromhttps://bit.ly/3mJQz72
4.
BelmanJ. (2014). Game elements: The languages of values. In FlanaganM.NissenbaumH. (Eds.), Values at play in digital games (pp. 33-72). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
BelmanJ.FlanaganM. (2010). Designing games to foster empathy. International Journal of Cognitive Technology, 15(1), 5-15.
6.
BjørkeloK. A.JørgensenK. (2018). The asylum seekers larp: The positive discomfort of transgressive realism. In Proceedings of Nordic DiGRA 2018(pp. 1-12). Bergen, Norway, 28-30 November 2018. The University of Bergen.
BoppJ. A.MeklerE. D.OpwisK. (2016). Negative emotion, positive experience?: Emotionally moving moments in digital games. In Proceedings of CHI 2016(pp. 2996-3006). San Jose, CA, 7-12 May 2016.
9.
BoppJ. A.MüllerL. J.AeschbachL. F.OpwisK.MelkerE. D. (2019). Exploring emotional attachment to game characters. In Proceedings of CHI PLAY 2019(pp. 313-324). Barcelona, Spain, 22-25 October 2019.
10.
BowmanS. L. (2013). Social conflict in role-playing communities: An exploratory qualitative study. International Journal of Role-Playing, 4, 4-25.
11.
BrownA. M. L. (2015). Three defences for the fourteen-inch barbed penis: Darkly playing with morals, ethics and sexual violence. In MortensenT. E.LinderothJ.BrownA. M. L. (Eds.), The dark side of game play: Controversial issues in playful environments (pp. 119-136). New York/London: Routledge.
12.
BrownJ.GerlingK.DickinsonP.KrimanB. (2015). Dead fun: Uncomfortable interactions in a virtual reality game for coffins. In Proceedings of CHI PLAY 2015 (pp. 475-480). London, 3-7 October 2015.
13.
BurgessJ.JonesC. (2020). “I harbour strong feelings for Tali despite her being a fictional character”: Investigating videogame players’ emotional attachments to non-player characters. Game Studies, 20(1).
14.
BurkeJ.McneillM.CharlesD.MorrowP.CrosbieJ.McdonoughS. (2010). Augmented reality games for upper-limb stroke rehabilitation. In Proceedings of VS-GAMES 2010 (pp. 75–78). Braga, Portugal, 25-26 March 2010.
15.
CarterM. (2022). Treacherous play. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
CarterM.AllisonF. (2017). Fear, loss and meaningful play: Permadeath in DayZ. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 9(2), 143-158.
17.
CarterM.AllisonF. (2019). Guilt in DayZ. In JørgensenK.KarlsenF. (Eds.), Transgressive games aesthetics (pp. 134-152). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
CarterM.GibbsM.WadleyG. (2013). Death and dying in DayZ. In Proceedings of IE 2013 (pp. 1-6). Victoria, Australia, 30 September-1 October. RMIT University.
19.
ChalkA. (2018). A chronology of Dungeons & Dragons in popular media. Anolog Game Studies, 6(1).
20.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, England: SAGE.
21.
CookM. P.GremoM.MorganR. (2016). We’re just playing: The influence of a modified tabletop role-playing game on ela students’ in-class reading. Simulation & Gaming, 48(2), 199-218.
22.
CopcicA.McKenzieS.HobbsM. (2013). Permadeath: A review of literature. In Proceedings of IGIC 2013 (pp. 40-47). Vancouver, British Colombia, Canada, 23-25 September 2013.
23.
CoteA. (2020). In the aftermath: Women's changing views on gaming and sexism following #GamerGate. In Gaming sexism: Gender and identity in the era of casual video games (pp. 190-197). New York: New York University Press.
24.
DashiellS. (2017). Rules lawyering as symbolic and linguistic capital. Analog Game Studies, 4(5).
25.
DashiellS. (2018). “Rules as written”: Game algorithms as game capital. Analog Game Studies, 5(3).
26.
FineG. A. (1983). Shared fantasy: Role-playing games as social worlds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27.
Flynn-JonesE. (2015). Don’t forget to die: A software update is available for the death drive. In MortensenT. E.LinderothJ.BrownA. M. L. (Eds.), The dark side of game play: Controversial issues in playful environments (pp. 50-63). New York/London: Routledge.
28.
FoxT. (2015). Undertale [PC Game]. USA: Toby Fox.
29.
GarciaA. (2020). Gaming literacies: Spatiality, materiality, and analog learning in a digital age. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 9-27.
30.
GeeJ. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
GeertzC. (1972). Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. Daedalus, 101(1), 1-37.
32.
GeraciR. M.RecineN.FoxS. (2016). Grotesque gaming: The monstrous in online worlds. Preternature: Critical and Historical Studies on the Preternatural, 5(2), 213-236.
33.
GibbsM. R.CarterM.MoriJ. (2016). RIP vile rat: Makeshift memorials in EVE Online. In M. Carter, K. Bergstrom, & D. Woodford (Eds.), Internet spaceships are serious business: An EVE Online Reader (pp. 14-17). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
34.
GibsonM. (2019). Death in Second Life: Lost and missing lives. In KohnT.GibbsM.NansenB.van RynL. (Eds.), Residues of death: Disposal refigured (pp. 153-168). New York/London: Routledge.
35.
GoffmanE. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
GowlerC. P. R.IacovidesI. (2019). “ Horror, guilt and shame”: Uncomfortable experiences in digital games. In Proceedings of CHI PLAY 2019 (pp. 325-337). Barcelona, Spain, 22-25 October 2019.
37.
HarringtonB.O’ConnellM. (2016). Video games as virtual teachers: Prosocial video game use by children and adolescents from different socioeconomic groups is associated with increased empathy and prosocial behaviour. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 650-658.
38.
HoffmanK. M. (2019). Social and cognitive affordances of two depression-themed games. Games and Culture, 14(7-8), 875-895.
39.
HopeametsäH. (2008). 24 hours in a bomb shelter. In MontolaM.StenrosJ. (Eds.), Playground worlds (pp. 187-198). Helsinki: Ropecon.
40.
HuizingaJ. (1955). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Boston: Beacon Press.
41.
JacobsA.TimmermansA.MichielsenM.Vander PlaetseM.MarkopoulosP. (2013). Contrast: Gamification of arm-hand training for stroke survivors. In Proceedings of CHI 2013 (pp. 415-420). Paris, France, 27 April-2 May 2013.
42.
JenkinsH. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York, USA: NYU Press.
43.
JonesS. (2018). Blinded by the roll: The critical fail of disability in D&D. Analog Game Studies, 5(1).
44.
JonesS.PobudaT. (2020). An analysis of gender-inclusive language and imagery in top-ranked board game rulebooks. Analog Game Studies, 7(2).
45.
JørgensenK. (2014). Devil’s plaything: On the boundary between playful and serious. In Proceedings of Nordic DiGRA 2014 (pp. 1-11). Visby, Gotland, Sweden, 29-30 May 2014.
46.
JørgensenK. (2016). The positive discomfort of Spec Ops: The Line. Game Studies, 16(2).
47.
JørgensenK. (2019). When is it enough? Uncomfortable game content and the transgression of player taste. In JørgensenK.KarlsenF. (Eds.), Transgressions in games and play (pp. 153-167). Cambridge: MIT Press.
48.
JørgensenK.KarlsenF. (2019). Transgressions in games and play. Cambridge: MIT Press.
49.
JuulJ. (2005). Half-real: Videogames between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50.
KlastrupL. (2007). Why death matters: Understanding gameworld experience. Journal of Virtual Reality and Broadcasting, 4(3).
51.
KlastrupL. (2008). What makes World of Warcraft a world? A note on death and dying. In CorneliussenH. G.RettbergJ. V. (Eds.), Digital culture, play and identity: A World of Warcraft reader (pp. 143-166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
KocurekC. A. (2015). Who hearkens to the monster's scream? Death, violence and the veil of the monstrous in video games. Visual Studies, 30(1), 79-89.
53.
LaLoneN. (2019). A tale of Dungeons & Dragons and the origins of the game platform. Analog Game Studies, 6(3).
54.
LinderothJ.ÖhrnE. (2014). Chivalry, subordination and courtship culture: Being a ‘Woman' in online games. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 6(1), 33-47.
55.
LingelJ. (2013). The digital remains: Social media and practices of online grief. The Information Society, 29(3), 190-195.
56.
MaslowA. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370.
57.
McAllisterK. S.RuggillJ. E. (2018). Playing to death. American Journal of Play, 11(1), 85-103.
58.
McFarlandJ. (2020). Leveling up for the teacher-practitioner. Schools, 17(1), 115-135.
59.
McGonigalJ. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. London: Jonathan Cape.
60.
MitgutschK.WeiseM. (2011). Subversive game design for recursive learning. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2011 (pp. 1-16). Hilversum, The Netherlands, 14-17 September 2011.
61.
MizerN. J. (2019). Tabletop role-playing games and the experience of imagined worlds. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
62.
MontolaM. (2010). The positive negative experience in extreme role-playing. In Proceedings of Nordic DiGRA 2010 (pp. 1-8). Stockholm, Sweden, 16-17 August 2010.
63.
NguyenC. T.RubergB. (2020). Challenges of designing consent: Consent mechanics in video games as models for interactive user agency. In Proceedings of CHI 2020 (pp. 1-13). Honolulu, HA, 25-30 April 2020.
64.
OstensonJ. (2013). Exploring the boundaries of narrative: Video games in the english classroom. English Journal, 10(6), 71-78.
65.
PaulC. (2018). A toxic culture: Studying gaming’s jerks. In The toxic meritocracy of video games: Why gaming culture is the worst (pp. 63-90). Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
66.
PetersonJ. (2012). Playing at the world: A history of simulating wars, people, and fantastic adventures from chess to role-playing games. San Diego, CA: Unreason Press.
67.
PetersonJ. (2018). Precursors. In J. P. Zagal & S. Deterding (Eds.), Role-playing game studies: Transmedia foundations. (pp. 55-62). London: Taylor & Francis.
68.
PetersonJ. (2020). The elusive shift: How role-playing games forged their identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
PetersonJ. (2021). Game wizards: The epic battle for Dungeons & Dragons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70.
PetralitoS.BrühlmannF.ItenG.MeklerE. D.OpwisK. (2017). A good reason to die: How avatar death and high challenges enable positive experiences. In Proceedings of CHI 2017 (pp. 5087-5097). Denver, CO, 6-11 May 2017.
71.
PhillipsA. (2018). Shooting to kill: Headshots, twitch reflexes, and the mechropolitics of video games. Games and Culture, 13(2), 136-152.
72.
PhillipsA. (2020). Sniper elite III. In PayneM. T.HuntemannN. B. (Eds.), How to play video games (pp. 141-148). New York: New York University Press.
73.
PolkinghorneA.TurnerJ.TaboadaM.KerrJ. (2021). Critical fail: Addressing problematic designs in table-top role-playing games for narrative therapy and community wellbeing. In Proceedings of DiGRA Australia 2021 (pp. 1-5). Online, 9-10 February 2021.
74.
RogersonM. J.GibbsM.CarterM.AllisonF. (2018). Understanding player elimination in boardgames as a form of permadeath. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2018 (pp. 1-3). Turin, Italy, 25-28 July 2018.
75.
RomeroB. (2009). Train [Boardgame]. USA: Brenda Romero.
SalenK.ZimmermanE. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge/London: MIT Press.
78.
SchottG. R. (2017). That Dragon, Cancer: Contemplating life and death in a medium that has frequently trivialized both. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2017 (pp. 1-10). Melbourne, Australia, 2-6 July 2017.
79.
ServaisO. (2015). Funerals in the ‘World of Warcraft': Religion, polemic, and styles of play in a videogame universe. Social Compass, 62(3), 362-378.
80.
SidhuP.CarterM. (2020a). The critical role of media representations, reduced stigma, and increased access in D&D's resurgence. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2020 (pp. 1-20). Postponed due to COVID-19.
81.
SidhuP.CarterM. (2020b). The critical role of YouTube and Twitch in D&D’s resurgence. In Proceedings of DiGRA Australia 2020 (pp. 1-3). Brisbane, Australia, 10-11 February 2020.
82.
SidhuP.CarterM.CurwoodJ. S. (2021). Unlearning in games: Deconstructing failure in Dungeons & Dragons. In Proceedings of DiGRA Australia 2021 (pp. 1-4). Online, 9-10 February 2021.
83.
StangS.TrammellA. (2019). The ludic bestiary: Misogynistic tropes of female monstrosity in Dungeons & Dragons. Games and Culture, 15(6), 730-747.
84.
StantonR.JohnsonM. (2021). The audiences of The Adventure Zone: Analysing actual play as inclusive gaming media. In Proceedings of DiGRA Australia 2021, (pp. 1-4). Online, 9-10 February 2021.
85.
StenrosJ. (2019). Guided by transgression: Defying norms as an integral part of play. In JørgensenK.KarlsenF. (Eds.), Transgressions in games and play (pp. 13-26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86.
StokesM. (2017). Access to the page: Queer and disabled characters in Dungeons & Dragons. Analog Game Studies, 4(3).
87.
Team Meat. (2010). Super Meat Boy [Xbox 360]. Seattle, WA: Microsoft Game Studios.
88.
Team Salvato. (2017). Doki Doki Literature Club! [PC Game]. USA: Team Salvato.
89.
TrammellA. (2014). Misogyny and the female body in Dungeons & Dragons. Analog Game Studies, 1(3).
90.
TrammellA. (2019). Analog games and the digital economy. Analog Game Studies, 6(1).
VoorheesG. A.CallJ.WhitlockK. (2012). Dungeons, dragons, and digital denizens: The digital role-playing game. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
93.
VygotskyL. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. In GauvainM.ColeM. (Eds.) Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34-41. New York: Scientific American Books.
94.
Wizards of the Coast [WOTC]. (2014). Player’s Handbook (Fifth Edition). Seattle, WA.
95.
WoutersN.RogersonM. J.HuY. (2021). The potential for facial biometrics in role-playing games. In Proceedings of DiGRA Australia 2021 (pp. 1-2). Online, 9-11 February 2021.
96.
WrightJ. C.WeissglassD. E.CaseyV. (2017). Imaginative role-playing as a medium for moral development: Dungeons & Dragons provides moral training. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 6(1), 99-129.
97.
ZagalJ.P.DeterdingS. (2018). Role-playing game studies: Transmedia foundations. London: Taylor & Francis.
