Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article addresses the political dimensions of Johan Huizinga’s seminal work Homo Ludens: A study of the play element in culture (1938). More than just a foundational text in academic ludology, this text positioned itself as a polemic against the right-wing political discourse going on in contemporaneous Nazi Germany, represented chiefly by Carl Schmitt. Through his concept of play, Huizinga hoped to resolve what he perceived to be the confusion of play and seriousness among a group of reactionary theorists narrowly focused on the Schmittian Ernstfall, the “serious case” of inimical violence. This article analyzes the usage of the concepts of “play” and “seriousness” in Huizinga’s and Schmitt’s respective corpuses and, finally, places their work in dialogue in order to understand the difficulties involved in defining play as unserious and unpolitical.

Keywords

Johan Huizinga Carl Schmitt the political play seriousness

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bush

R. M.

(2017). Serious play. Games and Culture, 12(3), 227.

Daniel-Wariya

(2019). Rhetorical strategy and creative methodology: Revisiting Homo Ludens. Games and Culture, 14(6), 622.

De Vugt

(2017). Philia and neikos: Huizinga’s “Auseinandersetzung” with Carl Schmitt. World Literature Studies, 9, 48-59.

Frissen

de Mul

Raessens

(2013). Homo ludens 2.0: Play, media and identity. In Thissen

Zwijnenberg

Ziljmans

(Eds.), Contemporary culture: New directions in humanities research (pp. 75-92). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

Gadamer

H.-G.

(2006). Truth and method (2nd ed.). (J. Weinsheimer & D.G. Marshall, Trans.). New York: Continuum.

Galli

(2012). Hamlet: Representation and the concrete (A. Sitze & A. Minervini, Trans.). In Hammill

Lupton

J. R.

(Eds.), Political theology and early modernity (pp. 60-83). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Geyl

(1963). Huizinga as accuser of his age. History and Theory, 2(3), 231.

Gombrich

E. H.

(1973). Huizinga’s Homo Ludens. In Koops

W. R. H.

Kossmann

E. H.

van der Plaat

(Eds.), Johann Huizinga 1872—1972. Papers delivered to the Johan Huizinga conference Groningen 11—15 December 1972 (pp. 275-296). The Hague: Nijhoff.

Huizinga

(1936). In the shadow of tomorrow. New York: W. W. Norton.

10.

Huizinga

(2002). Homo ludens: A study of the play-element in culture. Boston: Routledge.

11.

Levi

(2007). Carl Schmitt and the question of the aesthetic. New German Critique, 101(34), 27-43.

12.

Motte

(2009). Playing in earnest. New Literary History, 40(1), 25.

13.

Musselwhite

Marston

H. R.

Freeman

(2016). From needy and dependent to independent homo ludens: Exploring digital gaming and older people. Games and Culture, 11(1-2), 3.

14.

Otterspeer

(1997). Huizinga before the abyss: The von Leers incident at the university of Leiden, april 1933 (L. Gossman & R. Leushuis, Trans.). Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, 27(3), 385-444.

15.

Pan

(2008). Carl Schmitt on culture and violence in the political decision. Telos, 142, 49-72.

16.

Pan

Berman

(2008). Introduction. Telos, 142, 3-6.

17.

Roth

(2015). Serious gamification: On the redesign of a popular paradox. Games and Culture, 12(1), 100.

18.

Schmitt

(1940). Neutralität und Neutralisierungen (1939). Zu Christoph Steding “Das Reich und die Krankheit der europäischen Kultur”. In Positionen und Begriffe. Hamburg: Hanseatische Verlagsanstalt.

19.

Schmitt

(2005). Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty (G. Schwab, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

20.

Schmitt

(2007). The concept of the political (2nd ed.). (T.B. Strong, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

21.

Schmitt

(2009). Hamlet or Hecuba: The intrusion of the time into the play (D. Pan and J. R. Rust, Trans.). Candor, NY: Telos.

22.

Schmitt

(2017). Ex capitivitate Salus: Experiences, 1945—47 ( Kalyvas

Finchelstein

, Eds.) (M. Hannah, Trans.). Medford, MA: Polity.

23.

Simon

(2017). Unserious. Games and Culture, 12(6), 605-618.

24.

Stains

Formosa

Ryan

(2019). Morality play: A model for developing games of moral expertise. Games and Culture, 14(4), 410-429.

25.

Strauss

(2007). Notes on Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political (J.H. Lomax, Trans.). In C. Schmitt, The concept of the political (2nd ed.) (pp. 97-122). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

26.

Wesseling

H. L.

(2002). From cultural historian to cultural critic: Johan Huizinga and the spirit of the 1930s. European Review, 10(4), 485.

The Seriousness of Play: Johan Huizinga and Carl Schmitt on Play and the Political

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References