Fortnite is a massively multiplayer online “battle royale” game that rapidly grew in 2018 to become one of the most popular digital games in the world, with a reported peak of 10.8 million concurrent players and 250 million registered players in March 2019. Based on 24 interviews with young people aged 9–14 (17 boys and 7 girls), this article sets out to provide an account of the appeal and experience of Fortnite. While it is impossible to pinpoint exactly why Fortnite has been such a phenomenal, global success, in this article, we argue that its appeal can be better explained by its intersections with YouTube and game livestreaming, the way the game acts as a vehicle for social capital and the performance of identity, and the rich sociality of play.
AarsandP. (2010). Young boys playing digital games. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 5(01), 38–54.
2.
AarsandP. (2013). Children’s digital gaming cultures. In LemishD. (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of children, adolescents and media (pp. 120–126). Routledge.
3.
AmesM. G.BurrellJ. (2017, February). “Connected learning” and the equity agenda: A microsociology of Minecraft play. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing (pp. 446–457). https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998318
4.
Aran-RamspottS.FedeleM.TarragóA. (2018). YouTubers’ social functions and their influence on pre-adolescence. Comunicar: Media Education Research Journal, 26(57), 71–79.
5.
BassiouniD. H.HackleyC. (2016). Video games and young children’s evolving sense of identity: A qualitative study. Young Consumers, 17(2), 127–142.
6.
BeavisC.MusprattS.ThompsonR. (2015). ‘Computer games can get your brain working’: Student experience and perceptions of digital games in the classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 40(1), 21–42.
ChenM. (2012). Leet Noobs: The life and death of an expert player group in World of Warcraft. Peter Lang Publishing.
14.
CondittJ. (2019, March20). Epic games has 250 million ‘Fortnite’ players and a lot of plans. Engaget. https://www.engadget.com
15.
ConsalvoM. (2007). Cheating. MIT Press.
16.
CoverR. (2006). Gaming (ad)diction: Discourse, identity, time and play in the production of the gamer addiction myth. Game Studies, 6(1). http://gamestudies.org/06010601/articles/cover
17.
DaviesM. M. (2010). Children, media and culture. Open University Press.
18.
DezuanniM.O’MaraJ.BeavisC. (2015). ‘Redstone is like electricity’: Children’s performative representations in and around Minecraft. E-Learning and Digital Media, 12(2), 147–163.
19.
EdwardsS. (2013). Post-industrial play: Understanding the relationship between traditional and converged forms of play in the early years. In BurkeA.MarshJ. (Eds.), Children’s virtual play worlds (pp. 10–25). Peter Lang.
20.
GiddingsS. (2014). Gameworlds: Virtual media and children’s everyday play. Bloomsbury.
21.
HassanA. (2018, December13). Fortnite is a social space the way skateparks and Facebook used to be. Quartzy. https://qz.com
22.
HorstH. A.Herr-StephensonB.RobinsonL. (2019). Media ecologies. In ItoM.BaumerS.BittantiM.BoydD.CodyR.StephensonB. H.HorstH. A.LangeP. G.MahendranD.MartínezK. Z.PascoeC. J.PerkelD.RobinsonL.SimsC.TrippL. (Eds.), Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Living and learning with new media (pp. 29–78). MIT Press.
23.
ItoM.BaumerS.BittantiM.CodyR.StephensonB. H.HorstH. A.LangeP. G.MahendranD.MartínezK. Z.PascoeC. J.PerkelD.RobinsonL.SimsC.PerkelD. (2009). Hanging out, messing around, and geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. MIT press.
24.
JenkinsH. (1998). “Complete freedom of movement”: Video games as gendered play spaces. In CassellJ.JenkinsH. (Eds.), From Barbie to Mortal Kombat (pp. 262–297). MIT Press.
25.
KowertR.BreuerJ.QuandtT. (2017). Women are from FarmVille, men are from ViceCity: The cycle of exclusion and sexism in video game content and culture. In KowertR.QuandtT. (Eds.), New perspectives on the social aspects of digital gaming. Routledge.
26.
KowertR.FestlR.QuandtT. (2014). Unpopular, overweight, and socially inept: Reconsidering the stereotype of online gamers. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 17(3), 141–146.
27.
KrzywinskaT. (2008). World creation and lore: World of Warcraft as rich text. In CorneliussenH. G.RettbergJ. W. (Eds.), Digital culture, play, and identity. MIT Press.
28.
KsiazekT. B.WebsterJ. G. (2008). Cultural proximity and audience behavior. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(3), 485–503.
29.
KuschnerD. (2012). What is the state of play?International Journal of Play, 1(1), 103–104.
30.
LanierL. (2019, April4). Prince Harry wants ‘Fortnite’ banned. Variety. https://www.variety.com
31.
LivingstoneS. (2009). Children and the Internet. Polity Press.
32.
LivingstoneS.ÓlafssonK.HelsperE. J.Lupiáñez-VillanuevaF.VeltriG. A.FolkvordF. (2017). Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks for children online: The role of digital skills in emerging strategies of parental mediation. Journal of Communication, 67(1), 82–105.
33.
MaguireJ. S.MatthewsJ. (2012). Are we all cultural intermediaries now? An introduction to cultural intermediaries in context. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(1), 551–562.
34.
MalabyT. (2006). Parlaying value: Capital in and beyond virtual worlds. Games and Culture, 1(2), 141–162.
35.
MaloneyM.RobertsS.CarusoA. (2018). ‘Mmm…I love it, bro!’: Performances of masculinity in YouTube gaming. New Media & Society, 20(5), 1697–1714.
36.
MarshJ.PlowmanL.Yamada-RiceD.BishopJ.ScottF. (2016). Digital play: A new classification. Early Years, 36(3), 242–253.
37.
MavoaJ.CarterM.GibbsM. (2017). Beyond addiction: Positive and negative parent perceptions of Minecraft play. In Proceedings of the annual symposium on computer-human interaction in play (pp. 171–181). ACM Press.
38.
MavoaJ.CarterM.GibbsM. (2018). Children and Minecraft: A survey of children’s digital play. New Media & Society, 20(9), 3283–3303.
39.
MavoaJ.NansenB.CarterM.GibbsM. (2019). Why young children don’t play: Parent’s accounts of non-engagement with digital games. In GreenL.HollowayD.StevensenK.JaunzemsK. (Eds.), Digitising early childhood (pp. 192–211). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
40.
MolyneuxL.VasudevanK.ZúñigaH. G. (2015). Gaming social capital: Exploring civic value in multiplayer video games. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4), 381–399.
41.
NikkenP.JanszJ. (2006). Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, Media and Technology, 31(2), 181–202.
SteinkuehlerC.WilliamsD. (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as “third places”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 885–909.
44.
StuartK. (2018, August17). Fortnite is so much more than a game. Medium great escape. https://medium.com
TaylorT. L. (2018). Watch me play: Twitch and the rise of game live streaming. Princeton University Press.
47.
TrepteS.ReineckeL.JuechemsK. (2012). The social side of gaming. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 832–839.
48.
ValkenburgP. M.PeterJ. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243.
49.
WalshC.ApperleyT. (2009). Gaming capital: Rethinking literacy. In Proceedings of the AARE 2008 international education research conference, November 30 to December 4, 2008. QUT. https://www.aare.edu.au/data/publications/2008/wal08101.pdf
50.
WillettR. (2016). Online gaming practices of preteens: Independent entertainment time and transmedia game play. Children & Society, 30(6), 467–477.
51.
WillettR. (2017). ‘Friending someone means just adding them to your friends list, not much else’: Children’s casual practices in virtual world games. Convergence, 23(3), 325–340.
