Contemporary narrative video games still owe a debt to notions of plotting and characterization inherited from realist novels, even as they demonstrate how digital technologies are driving the development not merely of new fictional forms but also new conceptions of identity and subjectivity. This article expands upon these claims through analyses of three texts. Published in 1888 and revised in 1908, Henry James’s novella The Aspern Papers follows a protagonist obsessed with laying his hands on a long-dead Romantic poet’s archive; released in the 21st-century, Christine Love’s (2012) Analogue: A Hate Story and Fullbright’s (2017) Tacoma imagine technologically advanced posthuman futures in order to pose questions about datafication, identity, and the terms on which the past remains accessible in the present. Considered together, they shed light on longer generic traditions, the relationship between literature and video games, and the ethical and epistemological issues raised by new technologies.
Galactic Café. (2011). The Stanley Parable[PC]. Austin, USA: self-published.
19.
GallowayA. R. (2012). The interface effect. Cambridge, England: Polity.
20.
Giant Sparrow. (2017). What Remains of Edith Finch[PS4]. Santa Monica, USA: Annapurna Interactive.
21.
JamesH. (2000). The Aspern papers and other stories. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1908)
22.
JenkinsH. (2004). Game design as narrative architecture. In HarriganP.Wardrip-FruinN. (eds.). First person: New media as story, performance, and game (pp. 118–130). Cambridge: MIT Press.
MatznerT. (2019). The Human is dead—Long live the algorithm! Human-algorithmic ensembles and liberal subjectivity. Theory, Culture and Society. doi:10.1177/0263276418818877
32.
MortensenT. E. (2018). Anger, fear and games: The long event of #Gamergate. Games and Culture, 13, 787–806.
33.
ní DhúillC. (2012). Towards an antibiographical archive: Mediations between life-writing and metabiography. Life Writing, 9, 279–289.
34.
NobleS. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression. New York: New York University Press.
PhillipsA. (2015). Shooting to kill: Headshots, twitch reflexes and the mechropolitics of video games. Games and Culture, 13, 136–152.
37.
PozoT. (2018). Queer games after empathy: Feminism and haptic game design aesthetics from consent to cuteness to the radically soft. Games Studies, 18. Retrieved fromhttp://gamestudies.org/1803/articles/pozo
38.
RadcliffeA. (1794). The mysteries of Udolpho. London, England: G. G. and J. Robinson.
39.
RoachR. (2018). Literature and the rise of the interview. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
40.
SavoyE. (2010). Aspern’s archive. The Henry James Review, 31, 61–67.
41.
ScottD. (2000). The Re-enchantment of humanism: An interview with Sylvia Winter. Small Axe, 8, 119–207.
42.
SedgwickE. K. (2008). Epistemology of the closet. London, England: University of California Press. (Original work published 1990)
43.
Star Maid Games. (2015). Cibele [OSX]. Portland OR, USA: self-published.
44.
StevensH. (2008). Henry James and sexuality. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
45.
StokerB. (1897). Dracula. Westminster: A. Constable and Co.
46.
TsimpoukiT. (2018). Henry James’s “The Aspern Papers”: Between the narrative of an archive and the archive of a narrative. The Henry James Review, 39, 167–177.
47.
Van DijckJ. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance and Society, 12, 197–208.
48.
WattI. (2001) The rise of the novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Original work published 1957)
49.
WildeO. (1890). The picture of Dorian Gray. New York: M. J. Ivers and Co.
50.
WolfeC. (2010). What is posthumanism?Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
