This article examines the transmedial theme and narrative genre of Bildung (life formation) in relation to video games. It revisits key tenets of life formation theory insofar as they can be applied to a small but growing corpus of games that emphasize spiritual and philosophical maturation and advancement. We argue that Joseph Campbell’s monomyth is an oversimplified and ultimately unsuitable lens through which to analyze character development in games, which restrains rather than stimulates the kind of complexities, diversity, and fluidity of character psychology needed in contemporary video game ecology. The main part of this study is dedicated to a comparative analysis of three indie games that address the life formation theme through allegories of space-in-time. The main focal areas will be character and story patterns; chronotopic mappings onto developmental trajectories; the treatment of mastery, mentorship, and choice; and the spiritual and metacognitive alignment of extra and intradiegetic education.
AarsethE. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2.
AylettR. (1999). Narrative in virtual environments: Towards emergent narrative. Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Narrative Intelligence, 83–86.
3.
BakhtinM. (1937). Forms of time and of the chronotope in the novel. In HolquistM. (Ed.), The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M. M. Bakhtin (pp. 84–242). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4.
BogostI. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
BolakiS. (2011). Unsettling the bildungsroman: Reading contemporary ethnic American women’s fiction. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Brill.
6.
CailloisR. (1961). Man, play and games. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
CampbellJ. (2008). The hero with a thousand faces. Novato, CA: New World Library.
9.
ChildsP.FowlerR. (2006). The Routledge dictionary of literary terms. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
10.
ClementR. (2017). Playing the story: The emergence of narrative through the interaction between players, game mechanics, and participatory fan communities(PhD thesis). University of Waterloo, Canada.
EnsslinA. (2013). Playing with rather than by the rules: Metaludicity, allusive fallacy, and illusory agency in The Path. In BellA.EnsslinA.RustadH. K. (Eds.), Analyzing digital fiction (pp. 75–93). New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
EnsslinA. (2016). Gamifying the Bildungsroman: Visual storytelling in “literary” games. Paper delivered at HuCon 2016, University of Alberta, March 4, 2016.
14.
EnsslinA.BellA. (2012). Click = kill: Textual you in ludic digital fiction. Storyworlds, 4, 49–74.
15.
FraimanS. (1993). Unbecoming women: British women writers and the novel of development. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
16.
FuchsM. (2015). Total gamification: Introduction. In FuchsM. (Ed.), Diversity of Play (pp. 7–20). Lüneburg, Germany: Meson Press.
17.
Gainax. (1991–2008). The Princess Maker series. Tokyo, Japan: Gainax.
18.
Gainax. (1993) The Princess Maker 2. Tokyo, Japan: Gainax.
19.
GeeJ. P. (2004). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GöbelS.BeckerF.FeixA. (2005). INSCAPE: Storymodels for interactive storytelling and edutainment applications. ICVS 2005, LNCS, 3805, 168–171.
