Mystic Messenger is a real-time mobile dating simulator and otome game that simulates how people fall in love online. In this essay, I will look at significant parallels between casual games and otome games and point out the ways in which both define women as players and consumers of games. By focusing on Mystic Messenger, I examine the ways in which the game’s real-time simulation of emotional labor becomes a way of policing women’s desires, a way of reinforcing nurturing roles over women’s desires, and a way of literally commodifying the assumedly female player’s leisure time. Furthermore, I also examine player practices and discussions of cheating within the player community, tagging these as light forms of resistances and ways in which various individuals in the community assert their identity and their agency over their own time.
AnableA. (2013). Casual games, time management, and the work of affect. ADA: Journal of Gender, New Media & Technology, 6. Retrieved fromhttp://adanewmedia.org/2013/6/issue2-anable/
2.
AzumaH. (2009). Otaku: Japan’s database animals (AbelJonathanKonoSion, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
3.
ChenL. C. (2014). What’s the cultural difference between the West and the East? The consumption of popular “cute” games in the Taiwanese market. New Media and Society, 16, 1018–1033.
4.
ChessS. (2012). Going with the Flo. Feminist Media Studies, 12, 83–99.
5.
ChessS. (2017). Ready player two: Women gamers and designed identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6.
ConsalvoM. (2007). Cheating: Gaining advantage in videogames. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.
ConsalvoM. (2009). Hardcore casual: Game culture return(s) to Ravenhearst. FDG ‘09 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games (pp. 50–54). Orlando, FL.
8.
*Cheritz Corp. (2016). Mystic Messenger[Android]. Seoul, Korea: Cheritz Corp. Played December 2016.
9.
De BouvoirS. (2011). The second sex (BordConstanceMalovaty-ChevallierShiela, Trans.). New York, NY: Vintage.
10.
FischM. (2015). “Days of love and labor”: Remediating the logic of labor and debt in contemporary Japan. Positions, 23, 463–486.
11.
GanzonS. C. (2018). “Sweet solutions for female gamers”: Cheritz, Korean otome games and global otome game players. In MacdonaldH. (Ed.), Digital love: Romance and sexuality in games. London, England: Taylor and Francis.
12.
GillR. (2007). Postfeminist media culture: Elements of a sensibility. European Journal of Cultural studies, 10, 147–166.
13.
HillsM. (2014). Veronica mars, fandom, and the “Affective Economics” of crowdfunding poachers. New Media & Society, 17, 183–197.
14.
HjorthL. (2009). Digital art in the age of social media: A case study of the politics of personalization via cute culture. Proceedings of DIGRA 2009. London, England.
15.
HochschildA. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16.
HollowsJ. (2000). Feminism, femininity and popular culture. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
17.
ItoMizuko. (2008). “Gender dynamics of the Japanese media mix,” In KafaiY.HeeterC.DennerJ.SunJ. (Eds.), Beyond Barbie and Mortal Kombat: New Perspectives on Gender and Gaming (pp. 97–110). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
JenkinsH. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: NYU Press.
19.
JuulJ. (2010). A casual revolution: Reinventing video games and their players. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20.
KimH. (2009). Women’s games in Japan: Gendered identity and narrative construction. Theory, Culture and Society, 26, 165–188.
21.
LefebvreH. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life (EldenStuartMooreGerald, Trans.). London, England: Continuum.
22.
McRobbieA. (2004). Post feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4, 255–264.
23.
McRobbieA. (2007). Postfeminism and popular culture: Bridget Jones and the new gender regime. In TaskerY.NegraD. (Eds.), Interrogating postfeminism: Gender and the politics of popular culture (pp. 27–39). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
