The 21st century has given rise to gaming industry technologies that drive a new type of learner in the classroom. This article draws data from four case studies that were conducted as part of a sequential mixed-model study. The study explored the 21st-century skills students reported learning through their video game consumption and creation of intellectual property. The qualitative data analysis led to the development of five major findings: (1) the strategist: accomplishing the mission, (2) the creator: the art of gameplay, (3) the communicator: building relationships and communities, (4) the hero: to be the hero of a great adventure, and (5) I am an “elite”: a digital native. These findings attempt to create a profile of the 21st-century classroom gamer based on the data. They represent and support research trends that explore the gaming phenomenon, gamer traits, and 21st-century skills learned through playing video games.
CharmazK.BelgraveL. (2002). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis. The SAGE handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft, 2, 2002. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
ClarkeA. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0868-6_15
5.
CrottyM. (2004). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Originally published on 1998.
6.
CorbinJ. & StraussA. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2012). The landscape of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
8.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
9.
DonovanL.GreenT. D.MasonC. (2014). Examining the 21st century classroom: Developing an innovation configuration map. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 50, 161–178.
GerberH. R.PriceD. (2011). 21st century adolescents, writing, and new media: Meeting the challenge with game controller and laptop. English Journal, 101, 68–73.
15.
GranicI.LobelA.EngelsR. C. (2014). The benefits of playing video games. American Psychologist, 69, 66.
KlopferE.YoonS. (2005). Developing games and simulations for today and tomorrow’s tech savvy youth. TechTrends, 49, 33–41.
19.
Leeds-HurwitzW. (2009). Social construction of reality. In LittlejohnS.FossK. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory (pp. 891–894). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McGonigalJ. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
22.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
23.
MeyersE. M. (2009). Tip of the iceberg: Meaning, identity, and literacy in preteen virtual worlds. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science, 50, 226–236.
MoustakasC. E. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
National Education Association. (2010). Preparing 21st century students for a global society: An educator’s guide to the “Four Cs.”Retrieved February 21, 2018, fromhttp://www.nea.org/tools/52217.htm
27.
Newzoo. (2017). Global games market report. Retrieved October 17, 2017, from Newzoo
Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2010). Up to the challenge: The role of career and technical education and 21st century skills in college and career readiness. Retrieved February 21, 2018, fromhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED519335
31.
PeshkinA. (1988). In search of subjectivity—One’s own. Educational Researcher, 17, 17–21. doi:10.2307/1174381
32.
PrenskyM. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9, 1–6.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
SaldañaJ. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
36.
SchwandtT. A. (2007). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
SiemensG. (2005, 1). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning. Retrieved fromhttp://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
38.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246.
39.
TuckerS. Y. (2014). Transforming pedagogies: Integrating 21st century skills and web 2.0 technology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15, 166–173.
40.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
