In this article, we develop the concept of “transplatform” to contribute to platform studies. We analyze the rivalry between the Atari Video Computer System (VCS)—the best-known member of the “second generation” of home videogame consoles—and Intellivision, which was the Atari VCS’s key competitor for most of this period. Through this analysis, we hope to provide conceptual tools for rethinking the notions of platform, culture, and context in platform studies. In particular, we seek to link the two main ways platforms are currently understood—“computing platforms” like the Atari VCS or Flash and “social platforms” like FaceBook or YouTube. Online sociality is increasingly “platform sociality” in some form. Understanding platforms not just in “context,” but as shaped by rivalries not ontologically subsequent to the platforms themselves, is vital to responding to these emerging formations.
AlticeN. (2015). I am error: The Nintendo family computer/entertainment system platform. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
ApperleyT.ParikkaJ. (2015). Platform studies’ epistemic threshold. Games and Culture, 1–21. doi:10.1177/1555412015616509
3.
BeardF. (2010). Comparative advertising wars: An historical analysis of their causes and consequences. Journal of Macromarketing, 30, 270–286. doi:10.1177/0276146710372222
4.
BergsonH. (1911). Creative evolution. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
5.
BloomS. (1982). Video invaders. New York, NY: Arco Publications.
6.
BogostI.MontfortN. (2009). Platform studies: Frequently questioned answers. Proceedings of the Digital Arts and Culture Conference. Retrieved fromhttp://escholarship.org/uc/item/01r0k9br
7.
BolterJ.GrusinR. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BurkeP. (2002). Context in context. Common Knowledge, 8, 152–177.
10.
BurtonR. (2014). The latest news from November 1980. Retro Gamer, 127, 16–17.
11.
DillonR. (2011). The golden age of video games. Boca Raton, FL: A K PEters/CRC Press.
12.
DourishP. (2004). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8, 19–30.
GeertzC. (1973). The impact of the concept of culture on the concept of man. In The interpretation of cultures (pp. 33–54). New York, NY: Basic Books.
15.
GeertzC. (1983). “From the native’s point of view”: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology (pp. 55–72). New York, NY: Basic Books.
16.
GillespieT. (2017). Governance of and by platforms. In BurgessJ.PoellT.MarwickA. (Eds.), SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 1–20). London, England: Sage.
17.
HarrisB. (2015). Console wars: Sega, Nintendo, and the battle that defined a generation. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
18.
HermanL. (2001). Phoenix: The rise and fall of videogames (3rd ed.). Springfield, NJ: Rolenta Press.
JonesS.ThiruvathukalG. (2012). Codename revolution: The Nintendo Wii platform. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
KatzA.YatesL. (1996). Inside electronic game design. Rocklin, CA: Prima Publishing.
22.
KonzackL. (2002). Computer game criticism: A method for computer game analysis. Proceedings of the Computer Games and Digital Culture Conference, Tampere, Finland, 89–100.
23.
LeorkeD. (2012). Rebranding the platform: The limitations of “platform studies.”Digital Culture and Education, 4, 257–268.
24.
MadianouM.MillerD. (2012). Polymedia: Towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16, 169–187.
25.
MasonG. (2014). Television with intelligence. Retro Gamer, 127, 54–59.
MontfortN.BogostI. (2009). Racing the beam: The Atari video computer system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
MurphyS. (2011). “This is intelligent television:” The emerging technologies of video games, computers, and the medium of television. In How television invented new media (pp. 41–58). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
29.
NooneyL. (2013). A pedestal, a table, a love letter: Archaeologies of gender in videogame history. Game Studies, 13. Retrieved fromhttp://gamestudies.org/1302/articles/nooney
30.
SchleckerM.HirschE. (2001). Incomplete knowledge: Ethnography and the crisis of context in studies of media, science and technology. History of the Human Sciences, 14, 69–87.
31.
SeaverN. (2015). The nice thing about context is that everyone has it. Media, Culture, & Society, 37, 1101–1109.
32.
StockingG. (1974). The basic assumptions of Boasian anthropology. In StockingG. (Ed.), The shaping of American anthropology 1883–1911: A Franz Boas reader (pp. 1–20). New York, NY: Basic Books.
33.
TylorE. (1871). Primitive culture, volume 1: The origins of culture. London, England: John Murray.
34.
WolfM. (Ed.). (2012). Before the crash: Early video game history. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
