Are shaggy seats which make cute noises playful or disruptive in a conference setting? This article pushes the limits of game scholars’ lusory attitude by breaching an academic seminar with a playful experiment. Five MurMur Moderator seats, interactive and interruptive furniture prototypes, were set up at a game research seminar where they were used as ambient elements during the presentations. The experience was evaluated by observation, accompanied with seminar tweets, and by conducting a small survey after the seminar. The experiences of the participants varied from enthusiastically positive to strong negative feelings. Through this experiment, we were able to explore the important issue of polarized attitudes of adults toward play and provide some food for thought for the future design of adult play.
ArrasvuoriJ.BobergM.HolopainenJ.KorhonenH.LuceroA.MontolaM. (2011). Applying the PLEX framework in designing for playfulness. In DesertiA.ZurloF. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, p. 24, Jun 22-25, 2011, Milano, Italy. ACM: New York.
2.
CastronovaE. (2013). Down with dullness: Gaming the Academic Conference. Information Society, 29, 66–70. doi:10.1080/01972243.2012.757262
3.
CoultonP. (2015). Playful and gameful design for the internet of things. In NijholtA. (Ed.), More playful user interfaces (pp. 151–173). Singapore: Springer.
4.
DeterdingS. (2014a). The ambiguity of games. Histories and discourses of a gameful world. In WalzS. P.DeterdingS. (Eds.) (2015) The gameful world. Approaches, issues, applications (pp. 23–64). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DeterdingS.DixonD.KhaledR.NackeL. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In LugmayrA. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference, ACM, September 28–30, 2011, Tampere, Finland.
FraylingC. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1, 1–5.
9.
GarfinkelH. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
GaverW. (2015). Homo ludens (subspecies politikos). In WalzS. P.DeterdingS. (Eds.), The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
GaverW.BowersJ.BoucherA.GellersonH.PenningtonS.SchmidtA.…WalkerB. (2004). The drift table: Designing for ludic engagement. In Dykstra-EricksonE.TscheligiM. (Eds.) Extended Abstracts of the 22nd SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 885–900). New York, NY: ACM.
12.
GaverW.BowersJ.BoucherA.LawA.PenningtonS. (2007). Electronic furniture for the curious home: Assessing ludic designs in the field. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 22, 119–152.
13.
HamariJ.KoivistoJ.SarsaH. (2014). Does gamification work?—A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In SpragueR. H.Jr. (Ed.), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). Waikoloa, HI, USA: IEEE Xplore Digital Library.
14.
HeljakkaK. (2013). Principles of adult play(fulness) in contemporary toy cultures. From wow to flow to glow. Doctoral dissertation, Aalto University, Finland.
15.
HeljakkaK. (2016). More than collectors. Exploring theorists’, hobbyists’ and everyday players’ rhetoric in adult play with character toys. Games and Culture. doi:10.1177/1555412016670493
16.
HolopainenJ.LuceroA.SaarenpääH.NummenmaaT.El AliA.JokelaT. (2011). Social and privacy aspects of a system for collaborative public expression. In RomãoT.CorreiaN.InamiM.KatoH.PradaR.TeradaT.DiasE.ChambelT. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, Nov 8-11, 2011. ACM: New York.
17.
HolopainenJ.NummenmaaT.KuittinenJ. (2010). Modelling experimental game design. In WaernA.LankoskiP.VerhagenH. (Eds.) Proceedings of DiGRA Nordic 2010: Experiencing Games: Games, Play, and Players, 2010, Stockholm, Sweden.
18.
HolmesJ. (2007). Making humour work: Creativity on the job. Applied Linguistics, 28, 518–537.
19.
HuotariK.HamariJ. (2012). Defining gamification—A service marketing perspective. Proceedings of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference, ACM, Oct 3–5, 2012, Tampere, Finland.
20.
KoivistoJ.HamariJ. (2014). Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 179–188.
21.
KultimaA. (2009). Casual Game Design Values. In LugmayrA.FranssilaH.SotamaaO.NärhänenP.VanhalaJ. (Eds.) Proceedings of MindTrek 2009 (pp. 58–65) Tampere, Finland. ACM: Tampere.
22.
KultimaA.AlhaK. (2011). Using the VNA Ideation Game at Global Game Jam. In CopierM.WaernA.KennedyH. (Eds.) Proceedings of Think Design Play: The fifth international conference of the Digital Research Association (DIGRA). Digitally available at: http://www.digra.org/dl/db/11301.19044.pdf
23.
KultimaA.NiemeläJ.PaavilainenJ.SaarenpääH. (2008). User Experiences of Game Idea Generation Games. In WinB.WatrallE.HeeterC. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Meaningful Play, 2008, East Lansing, MI, USA. Digitally available at: http://meaningfulplay.msu.edu/proceedings2008/
24.
KultimaA.NummenmaaT.TyniH.AlhaK.MäyräF. (2014). Goofy Mus, Grumpy Mur and Dirty Muf: Talking Playful Seats with Personalities. In ChisikY. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 2014 Workshops on Advances in Computer Entertainment Conference, p.9. ACM: New York.
25.
LambaH.MalikM. M.PfefferJ. (2015). A tempest in a teacup? Analyzing firestorms on Twitter. In PeiJ.SilvestriF.TangJ. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining 2015—ASONAM ‘15 (pp. 17–24). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi: 10.1145/2808797.2808828
26.
LandinH.LundgrenS.PrisonJ. (2002). The iron horse. In BertelsenO. W. (Ed.) Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction—NordiCHI ‘02 (p. 303). New York, NY: ACM.
27.
LochrieM.CoultonP. (2012). Creating a playful experience to encourage participation in the meta-narrative of Conference discussions. In LugmayrA. (Ed.) Proceeding of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference, MindTrek ‘12 (pp. 263–266). New York, NY: ACM.
28.
MontolaM.StenrosJ.WaernA. (2009). Pervasive Games: Theory and Design. Morgan Kaufmann.
29.
MäyräF. (2012). Playful Mobile Communication – Services Supporting the Culture of Play. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 3, 55–70.
30.
MäyräF.KultimaA.AlhaK.TyniH. (2013). Slide to Work: The Playful Office. Physical and Digital in Games and Play Seminar. 9th Game Research Lab Spring Seminar, May 29-30, Tampere, Finland.
31.
MäyräF.SotamaaO. (forthcoming). Foreword: Critical Evaluation of Game Studies. Games and Culture, Special Issue.
NummenmaaT.KankainenV.SavolainenS.KultimaA.KarvinenJ.AlhaK.SyvänenA.TyniH. (2016). The Diversity of Attitudes towards Play at the Workplace – A Case of an Academic Community. In BjörkS.O’DonnellC.BidarraR. (Eds.) Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference of DiGRA and FDG: Digital Games Research Association and Society for the Advancement of the Science of Digital Games, DiGRA/FDG ’16. (Digital Games Research Association and Society for the Advancement of the Science of Digital Games 13).
34.
NummenmaaT.KultimaA.KankainenV.SavolainenS.SyvänenA.AlhaK.MäyräF. (2015a). OASIS deck of cards: house of colleagues: a playful experiment on community building. In TurunenM. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 19th International Academic MindTrek Conference 2015, (pp. 2–9). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
35.
NummenmaaT.KultimaA.TyniH.AlhaK. (2014). MurMur moderators, the talking playful seats. In LugmayrA. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 18th Academic MindTrek Conference 2014: Media Business, Management, Content & Services. New York: ACM.
36.
NummenmaaT.SavolainenS.KultimaA. (2015b). Towards Playful Office Culture: Final Report of the OASIS – Playful Spaces for Learning and Collaboration at Work (2014–2015) research project. Tampere: University of Tampere. Digitally available at: https://tampub.uta.fi/handle/10024/98143.
37.
NummenmaaT.TyniH.KultimaA.AlhaK.HolopainenJ. (2015c). Need to Touch, Wonder of Discovery, and Social Capital: Experiences with Interactive Playful Seats. In ChisikY. (Ed.) Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE ’15). New York, NY, USA: ACM.
38.
PetersenM. G. (2007). Squeeze: Designing for playful experiences among co-located people in homes. Proceedings of CHI 2007, Apr 28–May 3, 2007, San Jose, CA.
39.
PrenskyM. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
40.
RaessensJ. (2014). The ludification of culture. In FuchsM.FizekS.RuffinoP.SchrapeN. (Eds.) Rethinking gamification. (pp. 91–114). Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Germany: Meson Press.
41.
StebbinsR. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences (1st ed.). Qualitative Research Methods (Book 48). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42.
StenrosJ. (2015). Playfulness, Play, and Games: A Constructionist Ludology Approach. Doctoral dissertation. University of Tampere, Finland.
43.
StenrosJ.MontolaM.MäyräF. (2007). Pervasive Games in Ludic Society. In KapralosB.KatchabawM.RajnovichJ. (Eds.) Proceedings of Research. Play. Share. Future Play 2007 Conference, Nov 15-17, 2007, Toronto, Canada.
44.
SynnottJ.CouliasA.IoannouM. (2017). Online trolling: The case of Madeleine McCann. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 70–78. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.053
45.
Sutton-SmithB. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
46.
TsujitaH.TsukadaK.SiioI. (2008). SyncDecor: Communication appliances for couples separated by distance. In Lloret MauriJ.CardonaN.ChenK-C.PopescuM.DociA. (Eds.) Mobile Ubiquitous Computing, Systems, Services and Technologies, 2008. UBICOMM ‘08. The Second International Conference on, September 29–October 4, 2008 (pp. 279–286). Valencia, Spain: IEEE Xplore Digital Library.
47.
TsujitaH.TsukadaK.SiioI. (2010). InPhase: Evaluation of a communication system focused on “happy coincidences” of daily behaviors. In MynattE. (Ed.) Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘10) (pp. 2481–2490). New York, NY: ACM.
48.
TyniH.KultimaA.MäyräF. (2013). Dimensions of Hybrid in Playful Products. In LugmayrA.FranssilaH.PaavilainenJ.KärkkäinenH. (Eds.) Proceedings of 17th International Academic MindTrek Conference, Oct 3, 2013. New York: ACM.
49.
TyniH.KultimaA.NummenmaaT.AlhaK.KankainenV.MäyräF. (2016). Hybrid Playful Experiences: Playing Between Material and Digital - Hybridex Project, Final Report. (TRIM Research Reports 19). Tampere: University of Tampere.
50.
UekiA.KamataM.InakageM. (2007). Tabby: Designing of coexisting entertainment content in everyday life by expanding the design of furniture. In InakageM.LeeN.TscheligiM. (Eds.) Proceedings of ACE’07, Jun 13–15, 2007, Salzburg, Austria.
51.
WalzS. P.DeterdingS. (Eds.). (2015). The gameful world. Approaches, issues, applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
WestS. E.HoffE.CarlssonI. (2016). Play and productivity: Enhancing the creative climate at workplace meetings with play cues. American Journal of Play, 9, 71–86.
53.
ZimmermanJ.ForlizziJ.EvensonS. (2007). Research through design as a method for interaction design research in HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 493–502). San Jose, CA: ACM.
