This paper describes research and development around two gameful courses that reimagined their assessment systems to better support student autonomy and promote engagement. We present results from an ongoing classroom-based research study that signals the success of these designs and, in so doing, explore key elements of what we call gameful design: the process of redesigning core elements of a learning environment to better support intrinsic motivation. We describe this process and discuss a set of promising practices for the design of gameful courses. Results from three studies indicate that gameful course design is positively related to students working harder and feeling more in control of their class performance.
AmesC. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
2.
BarataG.GamaS.JorgeJ.GonçalvesD. (2013). Improving participation and learning with gamification. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on gameful design, research, and applications (pp. 10–17). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1145/2583008.2583010
3.
BlumenfeldP. (1992). Classroom learning and motivation: Clarifying and expanding goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 272–281. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.272
4.
BootW. R.KramerA. F.SimonsD. J.FabianiM.GrattonG. (2008). The effects of video game playing on attention, memory, and executive control. Acta Psychologica, 129, 387–398. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.09.005
5.
BrownA. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141–178. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2
CrawfordB. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916–937.
8.
DeterdingS.DixonD.KhaledR.NackeL. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning future media environments (pp. 9–15). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
9.
DeterdingS.SicartM.NackeL.O’HaraK.DixonD. (2011). Gamification: Using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In CHI ‘11 Extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2425–2428). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979575
ElliotA. J.HarackiewiczJ. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461–475.Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461
12.
ElliotA. J.McGregorH. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501–519.
13.
ElliotE. S.DweckC. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12. Retrieved fromhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.1.5
14.
EricssonK. A.KrampeR. T.Tesch-RömerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
15.
FishmanB.AguilarS. (2012). Gaming the class: Using a game-based grading system to get students to work harder … and like it. In MartinC.OchsnerA.SquireK. (Eds.), Proceedings of the games, learning, and society conference 8.0 (pp. 111–117). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
16.
FishmanB.DeterdingS. (2013). Beyond badges and points: Gameful assessment systems for engagement in formal education. In WilliamsC.OchsnerA.DietmeierJ.SteinkuehlerC. (Eds.), Proceedings of the games, learning, and society conference 9.0 (pp. 365–370). Pittsburgh, PA: ETC Press.
17.
GeeJ. P. (2003). What videogames have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
HakulinenL.AuvinenT.KorhonenA. (2013). Empirical study on the effect of achievement badges in TRAKLA2 online learning environment. In Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering (LaTiCE), 2013 (pp. 47–54). Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1109/LaTiCE.2013.34
19.
HarackiewiczJ. M.BarronK. E.PintrichP. R.ElliotA. J.ThrashT. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645.
20.
HaskellC. (2013). 3D gamelab: Quest-based pre-service teacher education. In BaekY.WhittonN. (Eds.), Cases on digital game-based learning: Methods, models, and strategies (pp. 302–340). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2848-9.ch016
21.
HolmanC.AguilarS.FishmanB. (2013). GradeCraft: What can we learn from a game-inspired learning management system? In SuthersD.VerbertK.DuvalE.OchoaX. (Eds.), LAK ‘13: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 260–264). New York, NY: ACM.
LandersR. N.LandersA. K. (2014). An empirical test of the theory of gamified learning: The effect of leaderboards on time-on-task and academic performance. Simulation & Gaming, 45, 769–785.
24.
MartinezR.MartinC.HarrisS.SquireK.LawleyE.PhelpsA. (2012). Just press play: Design implications for gamifying the undergraduate experience. In MartinC.OchsnerA.SquireK. (Eds.), Proceedings GLS 8.0 (pp. 9–113). Madison, WI: ETC Press.
25.
MeeceJ. L.BlumenfeldP. C.HoyleR. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514–523. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.514
26.
MidgleyC.MaehrM. L.HrudaL. Z.AndermanE.AndermanL.FreemanK. E.…UrdanT. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
27.
MidgleyC.MiddletonM.KaplanA. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost?Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.77
28.
NolenS. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5, 269–287. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0504_2
29.
PenuelW. R.FishmanB.ChengB. H.SabelliN. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40, 331–337. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11421826
30.
PintrichP. R. (2000). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 92–104. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1017
31.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
32.
SalenK.TorresR.WolozinL.Rufo-TepperR.ShapiroA. (2011). Quest to learn: Developing the school for digital kids. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
SheldonL. (2012). The multiplayer classroom: Designing coursework as a game. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
34.
SzymanskiA.BenusM. (2012). Gaming the classroom: Results from a pilot in changing the teaching paradigm for algebra instruction. Presented at the Meaningful Play Conference, East Lansing, MI.
35.
ThomJ.MillenD.DiMiccoJ. (2012, 2). Removing gamification from an enterprise SNS. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1067–1070). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145362
