This article discusses the origins and development of the player-innovated dragon kill point (DKP) system as an example for thinking about Foucauldian conceptions of disciplinary power and the production of gamer subjectivity in the contexts of massively multiplayer online game (MMOG) power gaming. The argument considers the generalized hyperrationalism of DKP-based gaming as both an ideal digital form of panoptic control as well as a kind of ironic form of play with the limits of the possibility of control within digital culture.
Bartle, R. ( 1996). Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs . Journal of MUD Research, 1. Retrieved March 6, 2008, from http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm
2.
Becker, H.S. ( 1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 66, 32-42.
3.
Bogard, W.S. ( 1991). Discipline and deterrence: Rethinking Foucault on the question of power in contemporary society. The Social Science Journal, 28, 325-346.
4.
Bourdieu, P. ( 2000). Pascalian meditations. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
5.
Castronova, E., & Fairfield, J. ( 2007). Dragon Kill Points: A summary whitepaper. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from SSRN Web site: http://ssrn.com/abstract=958945
6.
Consalvo, M. ( 2007). Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
7.
de Peuter, G., & Dyer-Witheford, N. (2005). A playful multitude? Mobilising and counter-mobilising immaterial game labor. Fibreculture Journal, 5. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from http://www.journal.fibreculture.org/issue5/depeuter_dyerwitheford.html
8.
Deleuze, G. ( 1988). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9.
Dibbell, J. ( 2006). Play Money: Or, How I Quit My Day Job and Made Millions Trading Virtual Loot. New York: Basic Books.
10.
Foucault, M. ( 1977a). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Middlesex: Peregrine Books.
11.
Foucault, M. ( 1977b). Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D. F. Bouchard (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews (pp. 139-164). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
12.
Foucault, M. ( 1994). The subject and power. In P. Rabinow (Series Ed.) & J. B. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984. Power (Vol. 3, pp. 326-48). New York: New Press .
13.
Galloway, A. ( 2006). Gaming: Essays on essays on algorithmic culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14.
Hughes, R., & Coakley, J. ( 1991). Positive deviance among athletes: The implications for overconformity to the sport ethic. Sociology of Sport Journal , 8, 307-325.
15.
Huizinga, J. ( 1970). Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. New York: Harper & Row.
16.
Humphreys, S. ( 2005). Productive players: Online computer games’ challenge to conventional media forms. Journal of Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 2, 36-50.
17.
Kucklich, J. ( 2005). Precarious playbour: Modders and the digital games industry . Fibreculture Journal, 5. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from http://www.journal.fibreculture.org/issue5/kucklich.html
18.
Malone, K.M. ( 2009). Dragon Kill Points: The Economics of Power Gamers. Games and Culture, 4:3, 296-316.
19.
Markula, P., & Pringle, R. ( 2006). Foucault, sport and exercise: Power, knowledge and transforming the self. New York: Routledge.
20.
Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. ( 2005). From precarity to precariousness and back again: Life, labour and unstable networks. Fibreculture Journal, 5. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from http://journal.fibreculture.org/issue5/neilson_rossiter.html
21.
Postigo, H. ( 2003). From Pong to Planet Quake: Post-industrial transitions from leisure to work. Information, Communication & Society , 6, 593-607.
22.
Rettberg, S. ( 2008). Corporate ideology in World of Warcraft. In H. G. Corneliussen & J. Rettberg (Eds.), Digital culture, play and identity: A World of Warcraft reader (pp. 19-38). Cambridge: MIT Press.
23.
Ritzer, G. ( 1999). Enchanting a disenchanted world: Revolutionizing the means of consumption. London: Pine Forge Press.
24.
Rosenzweig, R., & Blackmar, E. ( 1998). The Park and the people: A history of Central Park. New York: Cornell University Press.
25.
Silverman, M. ( 2006). Beyond fun in games: The serious leisure of the power gamer. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Department of Sociology, Concordia University.
26.
Simon, B. ( 2005). The return of panopticism: Supervision, subjection and the new surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 3, 1-20. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/articles3(1)/return.pdf
27.
Simon, B., Boudreau, K., & Silverman, M. ( 2009). Two players: Biography and ‘played sociality’ in Everquest. Game Studies, 9:1. Retrieved August 13, 2009, from http://gamestudies.org/0901/articles/simon_boudreau_silverman .
28.
Stebbins, R.A. ( 2004). Between work and leisure: The common ground of two separate worlds. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications.
29.
Sutton-Smith, B. ( 1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30.
Taylor, T.L. ( 2003). Power gamers just want to have fun? Instrumental play in a MMOG. In F. Mayra, M. Copier & J. Raessens (eds.), Level Up: Proceedings of the first DiGRA conference (pp. 300-311). Utrecht: University of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
31.
Taylor, T.L. ( 2006). Play between worlds: Exploring online game culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32.
Terranova, T. ( 2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy . Social Text, 18, 33-57.
33.
Thott. (1999). Afterlife dragon lotto rules. Retrieved March 7, 2008 from http://www.afterlifeguild.org/dkp-explanation
34.
Wacquant, L.J.D. ( 2008). Pierre Bourdieu. In R. Stones (Ed.), Key sociological thinkers (pp. 261-277). 2nd Edition. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
35.
Yee, N. ( 2006). The labor of fun: How video games blur the boundaries of work and play. Games and Culture, 1, 68-71.
36.
Yee, N. ( 2007). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 9, 772-775.
