Situation awareness (SA) is crucial for jobs across the healthcare industry, especially in fast-paced emergency environments. Currently, measures of SA are subjective or require the person to stop and answer questions about the situation. A method to continuously and quantitatively detect levels of SA could potentially serve to assess training effectiveness or to intervene during care when SA is inadequate before mistakes occur. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether electroencephalography (EEG) and/or functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) measured at a single location provide additional explanatory value for SA beyond behavioral and experiential characteristics in a simulated emergency care task. Participants with varying levels of medical training completed the task; the Situation Awareness Global Awareness Technique (SAGAT) was used as ground truth for SA assessment. SAGAT scores correlated with both task performance and experience level; however, neither EEG nor fNIRS were correlated with SA.
AyazH.ShewokisP. A.BunceS.IzzetogluK.WillemsB.OnaralB. (2012). Optical brain monitoring for operator training and mental workload assessment. Neuroimage, 59(1), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.023
2.
BaldwinC. L.RobertsD. M.BarraganD.LeeJ. D.LernerN.HigginsJ. S. (2017). Detecting and quantifying mind wandering during simulated driving. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11(1), 406. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00406
BarnardY.LaiF. (2010). Spotting sheep in Yorkshire: Using eye-tracking for studying situation awareness in a driving simulator. In Human factors: A system view of human, technology and organisation. Annual conference of the Europe chapter of the human factors and ergonomics society 2009. https://trid.trb.org/View/1097517
5.
BarnesL.CiotolaJ. A.GulliB.Aaos American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. (2011). Emergency care and transportation of the sick and injured. (No Title). https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1130282271042828032
6.
BauchwitzB.MakivicM.ManningW.NiehausJ.BroachJ.LancetteP.GarrisonC.RitterF.WeyhrauchP. (2020). Performance assessment in a virtual simulation for integrated austere medical operations training. In Proceedings of the virtual Interservice/Industry training, simulation and education conference.
7.
BauchwitzB.NguyenJ.WoodsK.AlbagliK.SawitzM.HatchM.BroachJ. (2024). The use of smartphone-based highly realistic MCI training as an adjunct to traditional training methods. Military Medicine, 189(Supplement_3), 775–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae274
8.
BerkaC.LevendowskiD. J.LumicaoM. N.YauA.DavisG.ZivkovicV. T.OlmsteadR. E.TremouletP. D.CravenP. L. (2007). EEG correlates of task engagement and mental workload in vigilance, learning, and memory tasks. Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine, 78(5), B231–B244.
9.
BernhardtK. A.PoltavskiD.PetrosT.FerraroF. R.JorgensonT.CarlsonC.DrechselP.IsemingerC. (2019). The effects of dynamic workload and experience on commercially available EEG cognitive state metrics in a high-fidelity air traffic control environment. Applied Ergonomics, 77(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.008
10.
BiondiF. N.SaberiB.GrafF.CortJ.PillaiP.BalasingamB. (2023). Distracted worker: Using pupil size and blink rate to detect cognitive load during manufacturing tasks. Applied Ergonomics, 106(1), Article 103867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103867
11.
BogossianF.CooperS.CantR.BeauchampA.PorterJ.KainV.BucknallT.PhillipsN. M.TeamF. R. (2014). Undergraduate nursing students’ performance in recognising and responding to sudden patient deterioration in high psychological fidelity simulated environments: An Australian multi-centre study. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.09.015
12.
BrackenB.TobyneS.WinderA.ShamsiN.EndsleyM. R. (2021). Can situation awareness be measured physiologically? In AyazH.AsgherU.PalettaL. (Eds.), Advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering (259, pp. 31–38). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80285-1_4
13.
BraukmannR.BekkeringH.HiddingM.PoljacE.BuitelaarJ. K.HunniusS. (2017). Predictability of action sub-steps modulates motor system activation during the observation of goal-directed actions. Neuropsychologia, 103(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.07.009
14.
BrinkmanL.StolkA.DijkermanH. C.de LangeF. P.ToniI. (2014). Distinct roles for alpha-and beta-band oscillations during mental simulation of goal-directed actions. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(44), 14783–14792. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2039-14.2014
15.
CatherwoodD.EdgarG. K.NikollaD.AlfordC.BrookesD.BakerS.WhiteS. (2014). Mapping brain activity during loss of situation awareness: An EEG investigation of a basis for top-down influence on perception. Human Factors, 56(8), 1428–1452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814537070
16.
CausseM.ChuaZ.PeysakhovichV.Del CampoN.MattonN. (2017). Mental workload and neural efficiency quantified in the prefrontal cortex using fNIRS. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 5222. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05378-x
17.
CavanaghJ. F.FrankM. J. (2014). Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(8), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.04.012
18.
ChikhiS.MattonN.BlanchetS. (2022). EEG power spectral measures of cognitive workload: A meta‐analysis. Psychophysiology, 59(6), Article e14009. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14009
19.
CohenJ.CohenP.WestS. G.AikenL. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441
20.
CooperS.McConnell-HenryT.CantR.PorterJ.MissenK.KinsmanL.EndacottR.ScholesJ. (2011). Managing deteriorating patients: Registered nurses’ performance in a simulated setting. The Open Nursing Journal, 5(1), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.2174/18744346011050100120
21.
CooperS.PorterJ.PeachL. (2013). Measuring situation awareness in emergency settings: A systematic review of tools and outcomes. Open Access Emergency Medicine, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S53679
22.
DelormeA.MakeigS. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
23.
De WinterJ. C. F.EismaY. B.CabrallC. D. D.HancockP. A.StantonN. A. (2019). Situation awareness based on eye movements in relation to the task environment. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0527-6
24.
EndsleyM.JonesD. (2025). Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design (3rd ed.). Mica R. Endsley. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003388234
25.
EndsleyM. R. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, 32(2), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193128803200221
EndsleyM. R. (1995b). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 37(1), 32–64. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049543
28.
EndsleyM. R. (2006). Expertise and situation awareness. In The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 633–651). K. Anders Ericsson.
29.
EndsleyM. R. (2020). The divergence of objective and subjective situation awareness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 14(1), 34–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555343419874248
30.
EndsleyM. R. (2021a). A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct objective measures of situation awareness: A comparison of SAGAT and SPAM. Human Factors, 63(1), 124–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819875376
31.
EndsleyM. R. (2021b). Situation awareness measurement: How to measure situation awareness in individuals and teams. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
32.
EndsleyM. R.DixonJ.EndsleyT.JamrogD.Smith-VelazquezL.PfefferA. (2025). Divergence in situation awareness and workload. Ergonomics, 68(10), 1618–1634. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2427859
33.
EndsleyM. R.KirisE. O. (1995). The out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation. Human Factors, 37(2), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779064555
34.
FengC.LiuS.WanyanX.ChenH.MinY.MaY. (2022). EEG feature analysis related to situation awareness assessment and discrimination. Aerospace, 9(10), 546. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9100546
35.
FestaE. K.BrackenB. K.DesrochersP. C.WinderA. T.StrongP. K.EndsleyM. R. (2024). EEG and fNIRS are associated with situation awareness (hazard) prediction during a driving task. Ergonomics, 67(12), 1993–2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2367163
36.
FestaE. K.KimI.WinderA. T.BrackenB. K.DesrochersP. C.EndsleyM. R. (2025). Physiological measurement of situation awareness: A study of the validity of EEG and fNIRS during performance and automation monitoring in a complex task. Ergonomics, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2553130
37.
FrenchH. T.ClarkeE.PomeroyD.SeymourM.ClarkC. R. (2007). Psycho-physiological measures of situation awareness. In CookM.NoyesJ.MasakowskiY. (Eds.), Decision making in complex environments (pp. 291–297). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
38.
GateauT.AyazH.DehaisF. (2018). In silico vs. over the clouds: On-the-fly mental state estimation of aircraft pilots, using a functional near infrared spectroscopy based passive-BCI. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(1), 187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00187
39.
GateauT.DurantinG.LancelotF.ScannellaS.DehaisF. (2015). Real-time state estimation in a flight simulator using fNIRS. PLoS One, 10(3), Article e0121279. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121279
40.
GevinsA.SmithM. E. (2003). Neurophysiological measures of cognitive workload during human-computer interaction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 4(1–2), 113–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210159717
41.
GuoZ.PanY.ZhaoG.ZhangJ.DongN. (2020). Recognizing hazard perception in a visual blind area based on EEG features. IEEE Access, 8(1), 48917–48928. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2978436
42.
HirshfieldL.CostaM.BandaraD.BrattS. (2015). Measuring situational awareness aptitude using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. In International conference on augmented cognition (pp. 244–255). Springer.
43.
HoganM. P.PaceD. E.HapgoodJ.BooneD. C. (2006). Use of human patient simulation and the situation awareness global assessment technique in practical trauma skills assessment. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 61(5), 1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000238687.23622.89
44.
HorswillM. S.McKennaF. P. (2004). Drivers’ hazard perception ability: Situation awareness on the road. In A cognitive approach to situation awareness: Theory and application (pp. 155–175). Simon Banbury, Sébastien Tremblay.
45.
KästleJ. L.AnvariB.KrolJ.WurdemannH. A. (2021). Correlation between Situational Awareness and EEG signals. Neurocomputing, 432(1), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.12.026
46.
KaurA.ChaujarR.ChinnaduraiV. (2020). Effects of neural mechanisms of pretask resting EEG alpha information on situational awareness: A functional connectivity approach. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 62(7), 1150–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819869129
47.
KlimeschW. (1999). EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: A review and analysis. Brain Research Reviews, 29(2–3), 169–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00056-3
48.
LavoieP.CossetteS.PepinJ. (2016). Testing nursing students’ clinical judgment in a patient deterioration simulation scenario: Development of a situation awareness instrument. Nurse Education Today, 38(1), 61–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.015
49.
LevinS.SauerL.KelenG.KirschT.PhamJ.DesaiS.FranceD. (2012). Situation awareness in emergency medicine. IIE Transactions on Healthcare Systems Engineering, 2(2), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19488300.2012.684739
50.
LiQ.NgK. K.SimonC. M.YiuC. Y.LyuM. (2023). Recognising situation awareness associated with different workloads using EEG and eye-tracking features in air traffic control tasks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 260(1), Article 110179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110179
51.
MarsR. B.DebenerS.GladwinT. E.HarrisonL. M.HaggardP.RothwellJ. C.BestmannS. (2008). Trial-by-trial fluctuations in the event-related electroencephalogram reflect dynamic changes in the degree of surprise. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(47), 12539–12545. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2925-08.2008
52.
MolinaE.SanabriaD.JungT.-P.CorreaA. (2019). Electroencephalographic and peripheral temperature dynamics during a prolonged psychomotor vigilance task. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 126(1), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.014
53.
Norri-SederholmT.PaakkonenH.KurolaJ.SarantoK. (2015). Situational awareness and information flow in prehospital emergency medical care from the perspective of paramedic field supervisors: A scenario-based study. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 23(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-014-0083-x
54.
OrasanuJ.DismukesR. K.FischerU. (1993). Decision errors in the cockpit. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society - Annual Meeting, 37(4), 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193129303700423
55.
OrasanuJ.FischerU. (2014). Finding decisions in natural environments: The view from the cockpit. In Naturalistic decision making (pp. 343–357). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315806129-36
56.
OriqueS. B.DespinsL. (2018). Evaluating situation awareness: An integrative review. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 40(3), 388–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945917697230
57.
Perello-MarchJ. R.BurnsC. G.WoodmanR.ElliottM. T.BirrellS. A. (2023). Using fNIRS to verify trust in highly automated driving. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst, 24(1), 739–751.
58.
PoeG.SuyenobuB.BolstadC.EndsleyM.StermanM. (1991). EEG correlates of critical decision making in computer simulated combat. International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 6 Th, Columbus, OH, 758–763.
59.
PopeA. T.BogartE. H.BartolomeD. S. (1995). Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task. Biological Psychology, 40(1–2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(95)05116-3
60.
Prinzel IIIL. J.FreemanF. G.ScerboM. W.MikulkaP. J.PopeA. T. (2003). Effects of a psychophysiological system for adaptive automation on performance, workload, and the event-related potential P300 component. Human Factors, 45(4), 601–614. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.45.4.601.27092
61.
RosenmanE. D.DixonA. J.WebbJ. M.BrolliarS.GoldenS. J.JonesK. A.ShahS.GrandJ. A.KozlowskiS. W. J.ChaoG. T.FernandezR. (2018). A simulation‐based approach to measuring team situational awareness in emergency medicine: A multicenter, observational study. Academic Emergency Medicine, 25(2), 196–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13257
62.
SausengP.GriesmayrB.FreunbergerR.KlimeschW. (2010). Control mechanisms in working memory: A possible function of EEG theta oscillations. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(7), 1015–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.12.006
63.
SausengP.KlimeschW.DoppelmayrM.PecherstorferT.FreunbergerR.HanslmayrS. (2005). EEG alpha synchronization and functional coupling during top‐down processing in a working memory task. Human Brain Mapping, 26(2), 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20150
64.
SchulzC. M.KrautheimV.HackemannA.KreuzerM.KochsE. F.WagnerK. J. (2015). Situation awareness errors in anesthesia and critical care in 200 cases of a critical incident reporting system. BMC Anesthesiology, 16(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-016-0172-7
65.
SitterdingM. C.EbrightP.BroomeM.PattersonE. S.WuchnerS. (2014). Situation awareness and interruption handling during medication administration. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 36(7), 891–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945914533426
66.
SmithM. E.GevinsA.BrownH.KarnikA.DuR. (2001). Monitoring task loading with multivariate EEG measures during complex forms of human-computer interaction. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43(3), 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775898287
67.
StraterL. D.EndsleyM. R.PlebanR. J.MatthewsM. D. (2001a). Measures of platoon leader situation awareness in virtual decision-making exercises. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/html/tr/ADA390238/
TempelT.FringsC.PastötterB. (2020). EEG beta power increase indicates inhibition in motor memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 150(1), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.02.008
70.
TienG.AtkinsM. S.ZhengB.SwindellsC. (2010). Measuring situation awareness of surgeons in laparoscopic training. Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye-Tracking Research & Applications - ETRA, 10(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.1145/1743666.1743703
71.
VidulichM. A.StrattonM.CrabtreeM.WilsonG. (1994). Performance-based and physiological measures of situational awareness. Aviation Space & Environmental Medicine, 65(5), A7–A12.
72.
WigginsM.ConnaN.MorrisC. (1995). Self perceptions of weather-related decision-making ability amongst pilots. International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 8 Th, Columbus, OH, 845–850.
73.
WilliamsA. M.NorthJ. S.HopeE. R. (2012). Identifying the mechanisms underpinning recognition of structured sequences of action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(10), 1975–1992. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.678870
74.
WilsonG. F. (2000). Strategies for psychophysiological. Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, 3(1), 175–180.
75.
WuQ.ChenN.RauP.-L. P. (2025). EEG-based neural activity for decoding situation awareness at different levels. Ergonomics, 68(12), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2449570
76.
ZhengB.JiangX.TienG.MeneghettiA.PantonO. N. M.AtkinsM. S. (2012). Workload assessment of surgeons: Correlation between NASA TLX and blinks. Surgical Endoscopy, 26(10), 2746–2750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2268-6
