The cognitive systems engineering (CSE)/ecological interface design (EID) approach was applied in developing decision support for the flexible manufacturing system (FMS) work domain. Four interfaces were designed via the factorial application/non-application of direct perception (DP) and direct manipulation (DM). The capability of these interfaces to support performance in a simulated FMS was evaluated using a variety of traditional and novel dependent variables. The ecological interface (with DP, DM and an intact perception-action loop) provided clearly superior decision support (32 favorable significant results) relative to the other three interfaces (a combined total of 28 favorable significant results). The novel dependent variables were very sensitive. The results are interpreted from three different perspectives: traditional EID, the quality of constraint matching between triadic system components and closed-loop, dynamical control systems. The rationale for an expanded theoretical framework which complements, but does not replace, the original principles of CSE/EID is discussed. The potential for both specific interface features and novel dependent variables to generalize to real-world FMS applications is addressed. The expanded theoretical framework is universally relevant for the development of decision making and problem solving support in all computer-mediated work domains.
AricaE.NehzatiT.StrandhagenJ.HvolbyH.-H.AlfnesE. (2012). Decision support for effective production control: Insights from industry. In Paper presented at the 2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Info communications (CogInfoCom), Kosice, Slovakia, 02–05 December 2012.
2.
BaekD. H.OhS. Y.YoonW. C. (1999). A visualized human-computer interactive approach to job shop scheduling. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 12(1), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/095119299130489
3.
BallasJ. A.HeitmeyerC. L.PerezM. A. (1992). Direct manipulation and intermittent automation in advanced cockpits. Washington, DC: Naval Research Laboratory. (Final Report. NRL/FR/5534-92-9375).
4.
BenbasatI.ToddP. (1993). An experimental investigation of interface design alternatives: Icon vs. text and direct manipulation vs. menus. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(3), 369–402. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1017
5.
BennettK. B.EdmanC.CravensD. G.JacksonN. C. (In Press). Decision support for flexible manufacturing systems: Application of the cognitive systems engineering and ecological interface design approach. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making.
6.
BennettK. B.FlachJ. (2019). Ecological interface design: Thirty-plus years of refinement, progress, and potential. Human Factors, 61(4), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720819835990
7.
BennettK. B.FlachJ. M. (1992). Graphical displays: Implications for divided attention, focused attention, and problem solving. Human Factors, 34(5), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089203400502
8.
BennettK. B.FlachJ. M. (2011). Display and interface design: Subtle science, exact art. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
BensonC. R.GovindarajT.MitchellC. M.KrosnerS. P. (1989). Effectiveness of direct manipulation interaction in the supervisory control of FMS part movement. In Paper presented at the Conference Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Cambridge, MA, 14–17 November 1989.
ChristoffersenK.HunterC.VicenteK. (1997). A longitudinal study of the effects of ecological interface design on fault management performance. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics, 1(1), 1–24.
13.
DessoukyM.MorayN.KijowskiB. (1995). Taxonomy of scheduling systems as a basis for the study of strategic behavior. Human Factors, 37(3), 443–472. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872095779049282
14.
DunklerO.MitchellC. M.GovindarajT.AmmonsJ. C. (1988). The effectiveness of supervisory control strategies in scheduling flexible manufacturing systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 18(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.3462
15.
FrohlichD. M. (1997). Direct manipulation and other lessons. In Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 463–488). Elsevier.
16.
FurukawaH. (2009). Usage of different levels of functional information in multiple robot operation. In Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Robots and Agents (ICARA 2009), Wellington, New Zealand, 10–12 February 2009.
17.
FurukawaH. (2010). Adaptable user interface based on the ecological interface design concept for multiple robots operating works with uncertainty. Journal of Computer Science, 6(8), 904–911. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2010.904.911
18.
GibsonJ. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
19.
GibsonJ. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
20.
HigginsP. G. (1994). Graphical features for aiding decision-making in production scheduling. In Paper presented at the Harmony through Working Together: OZCHI 94 Proceedings, Melbourne, 28 November–1 September 1994.
21.
HigginsP. G. (1998). Extending cognitive work analysis to manufacturing scheduling. In Paper presented at the Proceedings 1998 Australasian Computer Human Interaction Conference, US, 29 November 1998. OzCHI'98 (Cat. No. 98EX234).
22.
HigginsP. G. (1999). Job shop scheduling: Hybrid intelligent human-computer paradigm. PhD Dissertation. University of Melbourne, Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering.
23.
HoriguchiY.AsakuraR.SawaragiT.TamaiY.NaitoK.HashiguchiN.KonishiH. (2007). Ecological interface to enhance user performance in adjusting computer-controlled multihead weigher. In SmithM. J.SalvendyG. (Eds.), Human interface, Part II, HCII 2007, LNCS 4558 (pp. 883–892). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
24.
HoriguchiY.KuronoK.NakanishiH.SawaragiT.NagataniT.NodaA.TanakaK. (2010). Ecological interface design for teaching assembly operations to industrial robot. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 43(13), 442–447. https://doi.org/10.3182/20100831-4-fr-2021.00078
25.
JacksonS.BrowneJ. (1989). An interactive scheduler for production activity control. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09511928908944375
26.
JacksonS.WilsonJ. R.MacCarthyB. L. (2004). A new model of scheduling in manufacturing: Tasks, roles, and monitoring. Human Factors, 46(3), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.3.533.50393
27.
JagacinskiR. J.FlachJ. M. (2003). Control theory for humans. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28.
JonesC. V.MaxwellW. L. (1986). A system for manufacturing scheduling with interactive computer graphics. IIE transactions, 18(3), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408178608974707
29.
KetteringhamP. J. A.O'BrienD. D. (1974). A simulation study of computer-aided soaking pit scheduling. In EdwardsE.LeesF. P. (Eds.), The human operator in process control (pp. 260–282). London: Taylor & Francis.
30.
KinsleyA. M.SharitJ.VicenteK. J. (1994). Abstraction hierarchy representation of manufacturing: Towards ecological interfaces for advanced manufacturing systems. In KiddP. T.KarwowskiW. (Eds.), Advances in agile manufacturing: Integrating technology, organization and people (4, pp. 297–300). Amsterdam; Washington, DC: IOS Press.
31.
KleinG. A. (1989). Recognition-primed decisions. Advances in Man-Machine Systems Research, 5, 47–92.
32.
KrebsJ. E.PlatzmanL. K.MitchellC. M. (1989). A real-time AGV-scheduling system that combines human decision-making with integer-programming algorithms. In Paper presented at the Conference Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Cambridge, MA, USA, 14–17 Nov. 1989.
33.
KrosnerS. P.MitchellC. M.GovindarajT. (1989). Design of an FMS operator workstation using the Rasmussen abstraction hierarchy. In Paper presented at the Conference Proceedings, IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Cambridge, MA, USA, 14–17 Nov. 1989.
LovieP. (1986). Identifying outliers. In LovieA. D. (Ed.), New developments in statistics for psychology and the social sciences (pp. 44–69). London, UK: The British Psychological Society and Methuen.
36.
MitchellC. M.GovindarajT.DunklerO.KrosnerS. P.AmmonsJ. C. (1986). Real time scheduling in FMS: A supervisory control model of cell operator function. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1986 International conference in Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Atlanta, GA, 1986.
37.
NadinM. (1988). Interface design and evaluation–semiotic implications. In HartsonH. R.HixD. (Eds), Advances in human-computer interaction (2, pp. 45–100).
38.
NakamuraN.SalvendyG. (1988). An experimental study of human decision-making in computer-based scheduling of flexible manufacturing system. The International Journal Of Production Research, 26(4), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207548808947885
39.
OjstersekR.LalicD.BuchmeisterB. (2019). A new method for mathematical and simulation modelling interactivity: A case study in flexible job shop scheduling. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 14(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2019.4.339
40.
PeirceC. S. (1931-1935a). Collected papers of charles sanders peirce. In HartshorneC.WeissP. (Eds.), (Vol. 1–6). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
PeirceC. S. (1931-1935b). Collected papers of charles sanders peirce. In BurkesA. (Ed.), (Vol. 7–8). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42.
PoultonE. C. (1974). Tracking skill and manual control. New York, NY: Academic Press.
43.
RasmussenJ. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC, 13(3), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.1983.6313160
44.
RasmussenJ. (1986). Information processing and human-machine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering. New York, NY: Elsevier.
45.
RasmussenJ.PejtersenA. M.GoodsteinL. P. (1994). Cognitive systems engineering. New York, NY: Wiley.
46.
RasmussenJ.VicenteK. J. (1989). Coping with human errors through system design: Implications for ecological interface design. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31(5), 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7373(89)90014-x
47.
RasmussenJ.VicenteK. J. (1990). Ecological interfaces: A technological imperative in high tech systems?International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2(2), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319009525974
48.
RothE. M.BennettK. B.WoodsD. D. (1987). Human interaction with an ’intelligent’ machine. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27(5-6), 479–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7373(87)80012-3
49.
SandersonP. M. (1989). The human planning and scheduling role in advanced manufacturing systems: An emerging human factors domain. Human Factors, 31(6), 635–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088903100602
StammD. J. (2004). Lights out on lights-out. Industrial Engineer, 36(5), 26–27.
54.
SternH.BeckerT. (2019). Concept and evaluation of a method for the integration of human factors into human-oriented work design in cyber-physical production systems. Sustainability, 11(16), 4508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11164508
55.
SuchmanL. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
56.
UptonC.DohertyG. (2005). Adapting the ADS for high volume manufacturing. In Paper presented at the IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer Nature.
57.
UptonC.DohertyG. (2006). Visual representation of complex information structures in high volume manufacturing. In ClemmensenT.CamposP.OmgreenR.PetjersenA.WongW. (Eds.), IFIP international federation for information processing, volume 221, human work interaction design: Designing for human work (pp. 27–45). Boston, MA: Springer
58.
UptonC.DohertyG. (2007). Integrating the visualisation reference model with ecological interface design. In Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: invent! explore!, New York, NY, August 28 –31, 2007.
59.
UptonC.DohertyG. (2008). Extending ecological interface design principles: A manufacturing case study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(4), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.10.007
60.
VicenteK. J. (1997). Operator adaptation in process control: A three-year research program. Control Engineering Practice, 5(3), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0967-0661(97)00018-x
61.
VicenteK. J. (1999). Cognitive Work Analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
62.
VicenteK. J. (2002). Ecological interface design: Progress and challenges. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1518/0018720024494829
63.
VicenteK. J.RasmussenJ. (1990). The ecology of human-machine systems II: Mediating “direct perception” in complex work domains. Ecological Psychology, 2(3), 207–249. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0203_2
64.
VicenteK. J.RasmussenJ. (1992). Ecological interface design - theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 22(4), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.156574
65.
WoodsD. D. (1984). Visual momentum: A concept to improve the cognitive coupling of person and computer. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7373(84)80043-7
66.
WoodsD. D.RothE. M. (1988). Cognitive systems engineering. In HelanderM. (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland).
67.
YahouniZ.MebarkiN.BelkadiF.ShahzadA.BernardA. (2018). Human-machine cooperation in planning and scheduling: A case study on an unstable environment. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 12(6), 757–780. https://doi.org/10.1504/ejie.2018.096388
