The research tested whether systematic exposure to expert-identified cues would improve novice criminal investigators’ cue recognition and, in turn, decision making. Two studies are reported, the first of which was a pre- to postexposure assessment of 20 novices’ cue recognition. This involved testing novices’ recognition (accuracy and latency) of pairings of text-based labels (elicited via cognitive task analyses with subject matter experts) prior to and following an exposure phase. The results revealed statistically significant improvements in comparison with a control group. In the second study, an assessment of 36 novices’ decision-making performance was undertaken prior to and following cue-based exposure (either expert or control cues). Participants engaged one of two decision tasks, which varied in the level of decision support offered: high (i.e., most pertinent features were highlighted for users) or low (i.e., features were naturally “embedded” in the task environment). Although participants receiving expert cue exposure demonstrated improvements in decision-making efficiency, advances in accuracy could be established only where a high level of support was offered. It was concluded that expert cue exposure can offer opportunities for learner development; however, a combination of exposure programs and decision support systems offers the greatest potential in improving the situation assessment skills of less experienced investigators.
AbernethyB.RussellD. G. (1987). The relationship between expertise and visual search strategy in a racquet sport. Human Movement Science, 6, 283–319.
2.
AndersonJ. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
AndersonJ. R.MatessaM. P. (1997). A production system theory of serial memory. Psychological Review, 104, 728–748.
4.
BeilockS. L.WierengaS. A.CarrT. H. (2002). Expertise, attention, and memory in sensorimotor skill execution: Impact of novel task constraints on dual-task performance and episodic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 55, 1211–1240.
5.
BorehamN. (1995). Error analysis and expert-novice differences in medical diagnosis. In HocJ. M.CacciabueP. C.HollnagelE. (Eds.), Expertise and technology (pp. 93–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
BrunswikE. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
7.
BuckolzE.PrapavessisH.FairsJ. (1988). Advance cues and their use in predicting tennis passing shots. Canadian Journal of Sport Science, 13(1), 20–30.
8.
ChaterN.OaksfordM. (2006). Mental mechanisms: Speculations on human causal learning and reasoning. In FiedlerK.JuslinP. (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 309–330). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
de GrootA. D. (1966). Perception and memory versus thought: Some old ideas and recent findings. In KleinmuntzB. (Eds.), Problem-solving: Research, method, and theory (pp. 19–50). New York, NY: Wiley.
10.
EbbesenE.KonecniV. (1975). Decision making and information integration in the courts: The setting of bail. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 805–821.
11.
FisherD.PollatsekA. (2007). Novice driver crashes: Failure to divide attention or failure to recognize risks. In KramerA. F.WiegmannD. A.KirlikA. (Eds.), Attention: From theory to practice (pp. 134–156). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12.
ForsterK. I.ForsterJ. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116–124.
13.
JacksonR. C.WarrenS.AbernethyB. (2006). Anticipation skill and susceptibility to deceptive movement. Acta Psychologica, 123(3), 355–371.
14.
JohnstonD.MorrisonB. W. (2016). Exploring cue use in rugby league playmakers to inform training initiatives. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 10(4), 391–410.
15.
JonesC.MilesJ. (1978). Use of advance cues in predicting the flight of a lawn tennis ball. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 4, 231–235.
16.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
17.
KirschenbaumS. S. (1992). Influence of experience on information-search strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 343–352.
18.
KleinG. A. (1993). A recognition primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In KleinG. A.OrasanuJ.CalderwoodR.ZsambokC. E. (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 138–147). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19.
KleinG. A. (1998). Sources of power: How people make decisions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20.
KleinG. A.CalderwoodR.Clinton-CiroccoA. (1986). Rapid decision-making on the fire ground. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 30th Annual Meeting, 1, 576–580.
21.
LovedayT.WigginsM. W. (2014). Cue utilization and broad indicators of workplace expertise. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision-Making, 8, 98–113.
22.
McCormackC.WigginsM. W.LovedayT.FestaM. (2014). Expert and competent non-expert visual cues during simulated diagnosis in intensive care. Frontiers in Cognition, 5, 949.
23.
MerbahS.MeulemansT. (2011). Learning a motor skill: Effects of blocked versus random practice—a review. Psychologica Belgica, 51(1), 15–48.
24.
MilitelloL. G.HuttonJ. R. (1998). Applied cognitive task analysis (ACTA): A practitioner’s toolkit for understanding cognitive task demands. Ergonomics, 41(11), 1618–1641.
25.
MorrisonB.WigginsM.PorterG. (2010). User preference for a control-based reduced processing decision support interface. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26, 297–316.
26.
MorrisonB.WigginsM. W.BondN.TylerM. (2013). Measuring cue strength as a means of identifying an inventory of expert offender profiling cues. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision-Making, 7, 211–226.
27.
MorrowD. G.MillerL. M. S.RidolfoH. E.MagnorC.FischerU. M.KokayeffN. K.Stine-MorrowE. A. (2009). Expertise and age differences in pilot decision making. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 16, 33–55.
28.
PerryN.WigginsM.W.ChildsM.FogartyG. (2012). Can reduced processing decision support interfaces improve the decision-making of less-experienced incident commanders?Decision Support Systems, 52, 497–504.
29.
PerryN. CWigginsM. W.ChildsM.FogartyG. (2013). The application of reduced processing decision support systems to facilitate the acquisition of decision-making skills. Human Factors, 55, 535–544.
30.
SchriverA. T.MorrowD. G.WickensC. D.TalleurD. A. (2008). Expertise differences in attentional strategies related to pilot decision making. Human Factors, 50(6), 864–878.
31.
SearleB. J.RooneyJ. (2015). Diagnostic cues in finance. In WigginsM. W.LovedayT. (Eds.), Diagnostic expertise in organisational environments (pp. 101–116). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
32.
ShanteauJ. (1991). Psychological characteristics and strategies of experts. In WrightG.BolgerF. (Eds.), Expertise and decision support (pp. 55–76). New York, NY: Plenum.
33.
ShanteauJ. (1992). How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant?Acta Psychologica, 81(1), 75–86.
34.
SmeetonN. J.WilliamsA. M.HodgesN. J.WardP. (2005). The relative effectiveness of various instructional approaches in developing anticipation skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11(2), 98–110.
35.
SpanjersI. A. E.WoutersP.van GogT.van MerrienboerJ. J. G. (2011). An expertise reversal effect of segmentation in learning from animated worked-out examples. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 46–52.
36.
StaggersN.NorcioA. F. (1993). Mental models: Concepts for human-computer interaction research. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38(4), 587–605.
37.
StokesA. F.KemperK. L.MarshR. (1992). Time-stressed flight decision making: A study of expert and novice aviators (Technical Report No. ARL-93-1/INEL-93-1). Savoy, IL: Aviation Research Laboratory.
38.
WickensC. D.HollandsJ. G.BanburyS.ParasuramanR. (2013). Engineering psychology and human performance (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
39.
WigginsM. W. (2014). The role of cue utilisation and adaptive interface design in the management of skilled performance in operations control. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 15(3), 283–292.
40.
WigginsM. W. (2015a). Cues in diagnostic reasoning. In WigginsM. W.LovedayT. (Eds.), Diagnostic expertise in organizational environments (pp. 1–13). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
41.
WigginsM. W. (2015b). Diagnosis and instructional systems design. In WigginsM. W.LovedayT. (Eds.), Diagnostic expertise in organizational environments (pp. 76–90). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
42.
WigginsM. W.BollwerkS. (2006). Information acquisition and decision-making amongst pilots. Human Factors, 48, 734–746.
43.
WigginsM.O’HareD. (2003). Expert and novice pilot perceptions of static in-flight images of weather. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13(2), 173–187.
