This is a response providing some thoughts triggered by the paper “Issues in Human–Automation Interaction Modeling: Presumptive Aspects of Frameworks of Types and Levels of Automation,” by David Kaber. The key theme is that in order to debate the relative merits of different conceptual frameworks to guide human–automation interaction design efforts, we need a richer understanding of the psychology of design. We need to better understand how contributions by the field of cognitive engineering really affect the efforts of system designers.
BoltonM. L.BassE. J. (2011). Evaluating human–automation interaction using task analytic behavior models, strategic knowledge-based erroneous human behavior generation, and model checking. In 2011 IEEE Conference on Systems, Man & Cybernetics (pp. 1788–1794). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
2.
GuerlainS.SmithP. J.ObradovichJ.RudmannS.SmithJ. W.SvirbelyJ. (1996). Dealing with brittleness in the design of expert systems for immunohematology. Immunohematology, 12, 101–107.
3.
GuerlainS.SmithP. J.ObradovichJ. H.RudmannS.StrohmP.SmithJ. W.SvirbelyJ.SachsL. (1999). Interactive critiquing as a form of decision support: An empirical evaluation. Human Factors, 41, 72–89.
4.
KaberD. (2018). Issues in human–automation interaction modeling: Presumptive aspects of frameworks of types and levels of automation. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 12, 7–24.
5.
MillerP. (1986). Expert critiquing systems: Practice-based medical consultation by computer. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
6.
OnnaschL.WickensC. D.LiH.ManzeyD. (2014). Human performance consequences of stages and levels of automation: An integrated meta-analysis. Human Factors, 56, 476–488.
7.
RouseW. B.BoffK. R. (1987). System design: Behavioral perspectives on designers, tools, and organizations. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
8.
RouseW. B.CodyW. R.BoffK. R. (1991). The human factors of system design: Understanding and enhancing the role of human factors engineering. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 1, 87–104.
9.
SilvermanB. G. (1992). Survey of expert critiquing systems: Practical and theoretical frontiers. Communications of the ACM, 35, 106–128.
10.
SmithP. J. (2017). Making brittle technologies useful. In SmithP. J.HoffmanR. R. (Eds.), Cognitive systems engineering: The future for a changing world. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
11.
SmithP. J.BeattyR.HayesC.LarsonA.GeddesN.DorneichM. (2012). Human-centered design of decisions-support systems. In JackoJ. (Ed.), The human–computer interaction handbook: Fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications (3rd ed., pp. 589–621). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
12.
WickensC. D.LiH.SantamariaA.SebokA.SarterN. B. (2010). Stages and levels of automation: An integrated meta-analysis. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting (pp. 389–393). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
