Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Anesthesia takes place in a complex, high-stakes environment where humans and technologies interact to provide medical care to patients. Providing adequate decision support for individuals and teams in anesthesia emergencies is important because emergencies are infrequent and complex. Current designs of decision support in airway management are not context specific and lack a consideration of how decisions are made under time pressure. To fill this gap, this study used frameworks from cognitive systems engineering to explore decisions of experienced anesthesia providers. The goal was to identify the decision pathways used in challenging airway management situations. The critical decision method was employed to interview anesthesia providers about a challenging incident they had experienced. Results illustrated that decisions were based on prior experience and made through a process of recognition. The vast majority of decisions were recognition primed, characterized by a direct link between cue familiarity and action generation. A few decisions involved concurrent option comparison, which was still based on situation recognition. Different cues received through teamwork, technologies, and patients contributed to the decisions. As different cognitive pathways may require different design solutions, the findings of this study are being used to help develop decision support tools in anesthesia.

Keywords

recognition-primed decision making topics cognitive task analysis methods health care delivery domains cognitive systems engineering

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apfelbaum

J. L.

Hagberg

C. A.

Caplan

R. A.

Blitt

C. D.

Connis

R. T.

Nickinovich

D. G.

(2013). Practice guidelines for management of the difficult Airway. Anesthesiology, 118, 251–270.

Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. (2012). ANZCA handbook for training and accreditation. Melbourne, Australia: Author. Retrieved from http://www.anzca.edu.au/documents/training-accreditation-handbook

Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. (2015). Guidelines on monitoring during anaesthesia (PS18). Retrieved from http://www.anzca.edu.au/documents/ps18-2015-guidelines-on-monitoring-during-anaesthe.pdf

Berkow

L. C.

(2004). Strategies for airway management. Best Practice and Research: Clinical Anaesthesiology, 18, 531–548. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2004.05.006

Bisantz

Roth

(2007). Analysis of cognitive work. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 3, 1–43. http://doi.org/10.1518/155723408X299825

Blandford

Furniss

Vincent

(2014). Patient safety and interactive medical devices: Realigning work as imagined and work as done. Clinical Risk, 20, 107–110. http://doi.org/10.1177/1356262214556550

Bromiley

(2009). Would you speak up if the consultant got it wrong? . . . And would you listen if someone said you’d got it wrong ?. Association for Perioperative Practice, 19, 326–330.

Cattermole

V. T.

Horberry

Hassall

(2016). Using naturalistic decision making to identify support requirements in the traffic incident management work environment. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1177/1555343416655509

Cook

T. M.

Woodall

Frerk

(2011). Major complications of airway management in the UK: Results of the fourth national audit project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society: Part 1. Anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 106, 617–631. http://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer058

10.

Crandall

Klein

Hoffman

(2006). Working minds: A practitioner’s guide to cognitive task analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

11.

Cuvelier

Falzon

(2011). Coping with uncertainty: resilient decisions in anaesthesia. In Hollnagel

Paries

Woods

Wreathall

(Eds.), Resilience engineering in practice: A guidebook (pp. 29–44). Surrey, UK: Ashgate.

12.

Cuvelier

Falzon

Granry

J. C.

Moll

M. C.

Orliaguet

(2012). Planning safe anesthesia: The role of collective resources management. International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine, 24, 125–136. http://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-2012-0564

13.

Degani

Wiener

E. L.

(1993). Cockpit checklists: Concepts, design, and use. Human Factors, 35, 345–359. http://doi.org/10.1177/001872089303500209

14.

Fackler

J. C.

Watts

Grome

Miller

Crandall

Pronovost

(2009). Critical care physician cognitive task analysis: an exploratory study. Critical Care, 13(2), 1–8. http://doi.org/10.1186/cc7740

15.

Fioratou

Flin

Glavin

(2010). No simple fix for fixation errors: Cognitive processes and their clinical applications. Anaesthesia, 65, 61–9. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05994.x

16.

Flin

Fioratou

Frerk

Trotter

Cook

T. M.

(2013). Human factors in the development of complications of airway management: preliminary evaluation of an interview tool. Anaesthesia, 68, 817–825.

17.

Frerk

Mitchell

V. S.

McNarry

A. F.

Mendonca

Bhagrath

Patel

Ahmad

(2015). Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 115, 827–848. http://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev371

18.

Gaba

D. M.

(1999). Anaesthesiology as a model for patient safety in health care. British Medical Journal, 320, 785–788.

19.

Gazarian

P. K.

Carrier

Cohen

Schram

Shiromani

(2015). A description of nurses’ decision-making in managing electrocardiographic monitor alarms. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24, 151–159. http://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12625

20.

Goldhaber-Fiebert

S. N.

Howard

S. K.

(2013). Implementing emergency manuals: Can cognitive aids help translate best practices for patient care during acute events? Anesthesia and Analgesia, 117, 1149–1161. http://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e318298867a

21.

Guest

Bunce

Johnson

(2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82. http://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903

22.

Heard

A. M. B.

Green

R. J.

Eakins

(2009). The formulation and introduction of a “can’t intubate, can’t ventilate” algorithm into clinical practice. Anaesthesia, 64, 601–608. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05888.x

23.

Heidegger

Gerig

H. J.

Henderson

J. J.

(2005). Strategies and algorithms for management of the difficult airway. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 19, 661–674. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2005.07.001

24.

Horberry

(2010). Using the critical decision method for incident analysis in mining. Journal of Health & Safety Research & Practice, 2(2), 11–22.

25.

Klein

G. A.

(1989). Recognition-primed decisions. In Rouse

W. B.

(Ed.), Advances in man-machine systems research (Vol. 5, pp. 47–92). Greenwich, CT: JAI.

26.

Klein

G. A.

(2008). Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors, 50, 456–460. http://doi.org/10.1518/001872008X288385

27.

Klein

G. A.

Calderwood

Clinton-Cirocco

(2010). Rapid decision making on the fire ground : The original study plus a postscript. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 4, 186–209. http://doi.org/10.1518/155534310X12844000801203

28.

Klein

G. A.

Calderwood

Macgregor

(1989). Critical decision method for eliciting knowledge. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 19, 462–472.

29.

Klein

G. A.

Kaempf

G. L.

Wolf

Thorsden

Miller

(1997). Applying decision requirements to user-centered design. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 46, 1–15. http://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0080

30.

Klein

G. A.

Orasanu

Calderwood

Zsambok

C. E.

(1993). Decision-making in action: Models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

31.

Klinger

Klein

G. A.

(1999). An accident waiting to happen. Ergonomics in Design, 7(3), 20–25.

32.

Lintern

(2010). A comparison of the decision ladder and the recognition-primed decision model. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 4, 304–327. http://doi.org/10.1518/155534310X12895260748902.

33.

Lipshitz

Klein

Orasanu

Salas

(2001). Focus article: Taking stock of naturalistic decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 331–352. http://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.381

34.

Manser

Wehner

(2002). Analysing action sequences: Variations in action density in the administration of anaesthesia. Cognition, Technology & Work, 4, 71–81. http://doi.org/10.1007/s101110200006

35.

Marshall

(2013). The use of cognitive aids during emergencies in anesthesia: A review of the literature. Anesthesia and Analgesia, 117, 1162–1171. http://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829c397b

36.

Marshall

(2015). The effects of cognitive aids on formation and functioning of teams in medical emergencies (Doctoral thesis). University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. Retrieved from https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/view/UQ:352951/s41087059_phd_submission.pdf

37.

Marshall

S. D.

Mehra

(2014). The effects of a displayed cognitive aid on non-technical skills in a simulated “can’t intubate, can’t oxygenate” crisis. Anaesthesia, 69, 669–677. http://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12601

38.

Neily

DeRosier

J. M.

Mills

P. D.

Bishop

M. J.

Weeks

W. B.

Bagian

J. P.

(2007). Awareness and use of a cognitive aid for anesthesiology. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 33, 502–511.

39.

Orasanu

Connolly

(1993). The reinvention of decision making. In Klein

G. A.

Orasanu

Calderwood

Zsambok

C. E.

(Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 3–20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

40.

Paix

A. D.

Williamson

J. A.

Runciman

W. B.

(2005). Crisis management during anaesthesia: Difficult intubation. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 14(3), e5. http://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2002.004135

41.

Pauley

Flin

Azuara-Blanco

(2013). Intra-operative decision making by ophthalmic surgeons. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 97, 1303–1307. http://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2012-302642

42.

Phipps

Meakin

G. H.

Beatty

P. C. W.

Nsoedo

Parker

(2008). Human factors in anaesthetic practice: Insights from a task analysis. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 100, 333–343. http://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem392

43.

Rall

Dieckmann

(2005). Safety culture and crisis resource management in airway management: General principles to enhance patient safety in critical airway situations. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 19, 539–557. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2005.07.005

44.

Rasmussen

(1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-13(3), 257–266. http://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.1983.6313160

45.

Rutherford

J. S.

Flin

Mitchell

(2012). Teamwork, communication, and anaesthetic assistance in Scotland. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 109, 21–26. http://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes172

46.

Ryan

Bernard

H. R.

(2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field methods, 15(1), 85–109.

47.

Schnittker

Marshall

S. D.

Horberry

Young

Lintern

(2016). Examination of anesthetic practitioners’ decisions for the design of a cognitive tool for airway management. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60th Annual Meeting (pp. 1765–1769). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.

48.

Schulz

C. M.

Endsley

M. R.

Kochs

E. F.

Gelb

A. W.

Wagner

K. J.

(2013). Situation awareness in anesthesia. Anaesthesiology, 118, 729–742.

49.

Sendelbach

Funk

(2013). Alarm fatigue: A patient safety concern. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 24, 378–386. http://doi.org/10.1097/NCI.0b013e3182a903f9

50.

Watterson

Rehak

Heard

Marshall

(2014). Transition from supraglottic to infraglottic rescue in the “can’t intubate, can’t oxygenate” (CICO) scenario. Melbourne, Australia: Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists.

51.

Ziewacz

J. E.

Arriaga

A. F.

Bader

A. M.

Berry

W. R.

Edmondson

Wong

J. M.

Gawande

A. A.

(2011). Crisis checklists for the operating room: Development and pilot testing. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 213, 212–217. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.04.031

Exploring Decision Pathways in Challenging Airway Management Episodes

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References