AdamsR.ForinT.SrinivasanS.MannL. (2010). Cross-disciplinary practice in engineering contexts: A developmental phenomenographical perspective. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 1, 1158–1165.
2.
AdamsR.MannL.JordanS.DalyS. (2009). Exploring the boundaries: Language, roles and structures in cross-disciplinary design teams. In McDonnellJ.LloydP. (Eds.), About designing—Analysing design meetings (pp. 339–358). London: Taylor & Francis.
3.
CollinsH.EvansR.GormanM. (2007). Trading zones and interactional expertise. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 38(4), 657–666.
4.
CosoA. E.PritchettA. R. (2015). Role of design teams in the integration of stakeholder considerations. Journal of Aircraft, 52(4), 1136–1145.
5.
GalisonP. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6.
GormanM. E. (2005). Levels of expertise and trading zones: Combining cognitive and social approaches to technology studies. In. GormanM. E.TweneyR. D.GoodingD. C.KincannonA. P. (Eds.), Scientific and technological thinking (pp. 287–302). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
JenkinsL. D. (2010). The evolution of a trading zone: A case study of the turtle excluder device. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 41(1), 75–85.
8.
KelloggK. C.OrlikowskiW. J.YatesJ. (2006). Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 22–44.
9.
StarS. L.GriesemerJ. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
