We describe a phenomenon viewed through the conceptual lens of a naturalistic decision-making perspective: a loss of system resilience, due to increased difficulty in performing macrocognition functions, associated with the implementation of new information technology. Examples of the phenomenon collected in a targeted literature review are characterized by stakeholder groups, technology, typical changes in workflow before and after implementation, and potential impacts on macrocognition and patient outcomes for four clinical care environments. The loss of system resilience is due to increased difficulty in performing macrocognition functions: (a) sensemaking due to less effective cognitive warm-up and collaborative framing strategies, (b) detecting events due to missing trends in data and changes to orders, and (c) coordinating due to less clinical knowledge during scheduling and updating information and less effective cross-checks. Potential impacts to patient safety include an increase in unnecessary care, missed care, delays in diagnoses and treatment, redundant care, inaccurate diagnoses, medication errors, and adverse events. We recommended future conceptually driven research in other complex, sociotechnical settings in order to develop useful metrics and reduce the risk of incurring undesirable and unnecessary impacts on cognitive work associated with new technology.
CarringtonJ. M.EffkenJ. A. (2011). Strengths and limitations of the electronic health record for documenting clinical events. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 29, 360–367.
2.
CollinsS. A.FredM.WilcoxL.VawdreyD. K. (2012). Workarounds used by nurses to overcome design constraints of electronic health records. Nurs In-form, 2012, 93.
3.
FriedbergM. W.ChenP. G.AunonF. M.Van BusumK. R.PhamC.CaloyerasJ. P.CrossonF. J. (2013). Factors affecting physician professional satisfaction and their implications for patient care, health systems, and health policy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
4.
GephartS.CarringtonJ. M.FinleyB. (2015). A systematic review of nurses’ experiences with unintended consequences when using the electronic health record. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 39, 345–356.
5.
GoldzweigC. L.OrshanskyG.PaigeN. M.TowfighA. A.HaggstromD. A.Miake-LyeI.ShekelleP. G. (2013). Electronic patient portals: Evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes. A systematic review. Annals of Internal Medicine, 159, 677–687.
6.
HirschtickR. E. (2012a). John Lennon’s elbow. JAMA, 308, 463–464.
HoffmanR. R.YatesJ. F. (2005). Decision(?)making(?). IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20(4), 22–29.
9.
HoganT. P.WakefieldB.NaziK. M.HoustonT. K.WeaverF. M. (2011). Promoting access through complementary eHealth technologies: Recommendations for VA’s Home Telehealth and personal health record programs. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26, 628–635.
HorwitzL. I.MeredithT.SchuurJ. D.ShahN. R.KulkarniR. G.JenqG. Y. (2009). Dropping the baton: A qualitative analysis of failures during the transition from emergency department to inpatient care. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 53(6), 701–710.
12.
HunterK. (2011). Implementation of an electronic medication administration record and bedside verification system. Online Journal of Nursing Informatics, 15.
13.
KleinG. (2008). Naturalistic decision making. Human Factors, 50, 456–460.
14.
KoppelR.MetlayJ. P.CohenA.AbaluckB.LocalioA. R.KimmelS. E.StromB. L. (2005). Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA, 293, 1197–1203.
15.
LowryS. Z.RamaiahM.PattersonE. S.BrickD.GursesA. P.OzokA.GibbonsM. C. (2014). Integrating electronic health records into clinical workflow: An application of human factors modeling methods to ambulatory care. Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare, 3, 170–177.
16.
LowryS. Z.RamaiahM.TaylorS.PattersonE. S.PrettymanS. S.SimmonsD.. . . GibbonsM. C. (2015). Technical evaluation, testing, and validation of the usability of electronic health records: Empirically Based use cases for validating safety-enhanced usability and guidelines for standardization (NISTIR 7804-1). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
17.
MillerD. M.SchapiraM. M.VisotckyA. M.LaudP.AroraV. M.KordusA.. . . FletcherK. E. (2015). Changes in written sign-out composition across hospitalization. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 10, 534–536.
18.
MillerR. H.HillmanJ. M.GivenR. S. (2004). Physician use of IT: Results from the Deloitte Research Survey. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 18, 72–80.
19.
NemethC.WearsR.WoodsD.HollnagelE.CookR. (2008). Minding the gaps: Creating resilience in health care. In HenriksenK.BattlesJ. B.KeyesM. A.GradyM. L. (Eds.), Advances in patient safety: New directions and alternative approaches. Vol. 3: Performance and tools (pp. 1–13). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
20.
PattersonE. S.CookR. I.RenderM. L. (2002). Improving patient safety by identifying side effects from introducing bar coding in medication administration. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 9, 540–553.
21.
PattersonE. S.DoebbelingB. N.FungC. H.MilitelloL.AndersS.AschS. M. (2005). Identifying barriers to the effective use of clinical reminders: bootstrapping multiple methods. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 38, 189–199.
22.
PattersonE. S.HoffmanR. R. (2012). Visualization framework of macrocognition functions. Cognition, Technology & Work, 14, 221–227.
23.
PattersonE. S.LatkanyP.BrickD.GibbonsM. C.RamaiahM.LowryS. Z. (2015). Integrating electronic health records into clinical workflow: An application of human factors modeling methods to two specialty care areas. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care, 4, 42–49.
24.
PattersonE. S.RogersM. L.RenderM. L. (2004). Fifteen best practice recommendations for bar-code medication administration in the Veterans Health Administration. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 30, 355–365.
25.
PattersonE. S.RogersM. L.TomoloA. M.WearsR. L.TsevatJ. (2010). Comparison of extent of use, information accuracy, and functions for manual and electronic patient status boards. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79, 817–823.
26.
PennathurP. R.ThompsonD.Abernathy III, J. H.MartinezE. A.PronovostP. J.KimG. R.. . . GursesA. P. (2013). Technologies in the wild (TiW): Human factors implications for patient safety in the cardiovascular operating room. Ergonomics, 56, 205–219.
27.
SimpsonK. R. (2015). Electronic health records. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 40, 68.
28.
SinghH.ThomasE. J.ManiS.SittigD.AroraH.EspadasD.PetersenL. A. (2009). Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: Are electronic medical records achieving their potential?Archives of Internal Medicine, 169, 1578–1586.
29.
SockolowP. S.RogersM.BowlesK. H.HandK. E.GeorgeJ. (2014). Challenges and facilitators to nurse use of a guideline-based nursing information system: Recommendations for nurse executives. Applied Nursing Research, 27, 25–32.
VicenteK. J. (1999). Cognitive work analysis: Toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
32.
WoodsD. D.WreathallJ. (2008). Stress-strain plots as a basis for assessing system resilience. In HollnagelE.NemethC.DekkerS. (Eds.), Resilience engineering: Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure (pp. 145–161). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
